Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentrations may help to identify patients with very low-risk acute pulmonary embolism: A preliminary study.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide outcome prediction pulmonary embolism

Journal

Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University
ISSN: 1899-5276
Titre abrégé: Adv Clin Exp Med
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101138582

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 30 12 2023
accepted: 15 04 2024
medline: 3 9 2024
pubmed: 3 9 2024
entrez: 3 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients with an acute pulmonary embolism (APE) are a heterogeneous group, and some of them may benefit from early discharge and an ambulatory care referral. We aimed to evaluate the use of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma level assessment in patients with low-risk APE based on clinical findings (0 points on the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI)). Preliminary analysis of an ongoing prospective study including 1,151 normotensive patients with at least a segmental APE. In the final analysis, 348 patients with a 0-point sPESI were included. Blood samples were collected within the first 24 h of admission. The clinical endpoint (CE) included APE-related mortality and/or rescue thrombolysis in patients with clinical deterioration. Clinical endpoints occurred in 3 patients who had higher plasma NT-proBNP levels than study participants with a favorable clinical course (164 [64-650] pg/mL compared to 2,930 [2,285.5-13,965] pg/mL; p = 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for NT-proBNP for the prediction of the CEs was 0.918 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.831-1.00; p = 0.013). We defined the cutoff value of NT-proBNP at ≥1,641 pg/mL. Among subjects with 0 points on the sPESI, those with concentrations of NT-proBNP exceeding 1,641 pg/mL might require closer attention; remaining patients could be considered candidates for outpatient treatment. However, these findings warrant further investigation in a large, prospective group of patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with an acute pulmonary embolism (APE) are a heterogeneous group, and some of them may benefit from early discharge and an ambulatory care referral. We aimed to evaluate the use of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma level assessment in patients with low-risk APE based on clinical findings (0 points on the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI)).
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
Preliminary analysis of an ongoing prospective study including 1,151 normotensive patients with at least a segmental APE. In the final analysis, 348 patients with a 0-point sPESI were included. Blood samples were collected within the first 24 h of admission. The clinical endpoint (CE) included APE-related mortality and/or rescue thrombolysis in patients with clinical deterioration.
RESULTS RESULTS
Clinical endpoints occurred in 3 patients who had higher plasma NT-proBNP levels than study participants with a favorable clinical course (164 [64-650] pg/mL compared to 2,930 [2,285.5-13,965] pg/mL; p = 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for NT-proBNP for the prediction of the CEs was 0.918 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.831-1.00; p = 0.013). We defined the cutoff value of NT-proBNP at ≥1,641 pg/mL.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Among subjects with 0 points on the sPESI, those with concentrations of NT-proBNP exceeding 1,641 pg/mL might require closer attention; remaining patients could be considered candidates for outpatient treatment. However, these findings warrant further investigation in a large, prospective group of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39225596
doi: 10.17219/acem/187187
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Bartosz Karolak (B)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Marta Skowrońska (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Michał Machowski (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Olga Dzikowska-Diduch (O)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Piotr Bienias (P)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Martyna Kuryła (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Małgorzata Wiśniewska (M)

Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Marek Gołębiowski (M)

Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Piotr Pruszczyk (P)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Michał Ciurzyński (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Clinical Hospital, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Classifications MeSH