Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone and vs belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

GPRC5D Multiple myeloma antibodies, bispecific comparative effectiveness research talquetamab

Journal

Current medical research and opinion
ISSN: 1473-4877
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Res Opin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0351014

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 3 9 2024
pubmed: 3 9 2024
entrez: 3 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Talquetamab is the first GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone (sel-dex) and vs belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) in patients with TCE RRMM. An unanchored MAIC was performed using individual patient-level data from patients treated with subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW) and 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W) from MonumenTAL-1 (NCT03399799/NCT04636552) and published summary data for sel-dex from STORM (NCT02336815) and belamaf from DREAMM-2 (NCT0325678). Patients from MonumenTAL-1 who met key eligibility criteria for STORM and DREAMM-2 were included. Outcomes of interest were overall response rate (ORR), complete response or better (≥CR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). After adjustment for cross-trial differences, patients treated with both dosing schedules of talquetamab showed significantly better ORR, ≥CR, and DOR vs sel-dex and significantly higher ORR and ≥ CR vs belamaf; DOR was relatively similar to belamaf. PFS was significantly improved with talquetamab Q2W and numerically in favor of talquetamab QW vs sel-dex and significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf. OS was significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs sel-dex and was numerically in favor of both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf. These analyses show superior effectiveness of both talquetamab dosing schedules vs sel-dex and vs belamaf for most outcomes and highlight talquetamab as an effective treatment option for patients with TCE RRMM.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39226081
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2391553
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-15

Auteurs

Donna Reece (D)

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Joris Diels (J)

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.

Suzy Van Sanden (S)

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.

Lixia Pei (L)

Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA.

Eric Ammann (E)

Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA.

Christoph Heuck (C)

Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.

Colleen Kane (C)

Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.

Anil Londhe (A)

Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.

Steve Peterson (S)

Janssen Research & Development, Horsham, PA, USA.

Ajai Chari (A)

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH