Firmicutes primarily drive odor emission profiles in poultry manure treatments.

air-drying room annular composting trough ectopic fermentation bed odor emission poultry manure treatment

Journal

Poultry science
ISSN: 1525-3171
Titre abrégé: Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 12 06 2024
revised: 17 08 2024
accepted: 19 08 2024
medline: 4 9 2024
pubmed: 4 9 2024
entrez: 3 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Odor emission during livestock manure treatment poses a threat to the environment and human health. However, the odor emission profiles and related factors of commonly employed poultry manure treatments have rarely been studied. Here, we explored the odor emission profiles of 3 common poultry manure treatments in China, namely, ectopic fermentation beds (EFB), annular composting troughs (ACT) and air-drying rooms (ADR). The results revealed that the total odor concentrations in the EFB, ACT and ADR groups were 2407.67 ± 512.94, 13444.00 ± 1269.92 and 621.33 ± 59.27, respectively. The ACT had the greatest number of odorants (31), followed by the ADR (27) and the EFB (24). Methyl mercaptan, acetic acid, acetaldehyde, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and acrolein were the key odorous compounds detected in all the treatments. ACT contained the greatest number of key odorants (11) and exhibited an extensive co-occurrence relationship with the bacterial community. The 3 poultry manure treatments exhibited significant differences in the beta diversities of the bacterial community. The phylum of most bacteria associated with key odorants was Firmicutes, and Enterococcus and Oceanobacillus were significantly positively correlated with methyl mercaptan. The bacterial functional groups were enriched in carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism and energy metabolism, and the functional genes shaped the odor emission patterns in the poultry manure treatments. Redundancy analysis demonstrated that odor emission in the 3 treatments was positively correlated with Firmicutes abundance, pH, electrical conductivity and moisture. Thus, our study provides a good understanding of odor emission profiles in poultry manure treatments and data for precise odor emission control during livestock production.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39226740
pii: S0032-5791(24)00829-0
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104250
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104250

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

DISCLOSURES The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Longhai Chen (L)

Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Meng Han (M)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Odor Pollution Control, Tianjin Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China.

Jiaojiao Xu (J)

Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Zhen Cao (Z)

Production Technology Department, Wen's Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527400, China.

Wenjun Chen (W)

Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Boyu Jing (B)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Odor Pollution Control, Tianjin Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China.

Guoliang Peng (G)

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Utilization and Conservation of Food and Medicinal Resources in Northern Region, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China.

Yan Wang (Y)

Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Xindi Liao (X)

Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Yinbao Wu (Y)

Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Xin Wen (X)

Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Utilization and Conservation of Food and Medicinal Resources in Northern Region, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China. Electronic address: wenxin171@foxmail.com.

Classifications MeSH