Whole-brain mechanism of neurofeedback therapy: predictive modeling of neurofeedback outcomes on repetitive negative thinking in depression.


Journal

Translational psychiatry
ISSN: 2158-3188
Titre abrégé: Transl Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101562664

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 19 12 2023
accepted: 23 08 2024
revised: 20 08 2024
medline: 4 9 2024
pubmed: 4 9 2024
entrez: 3 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Real-time fMRI neurofeedback (rtfMRI-NF) has emerged as a promising intervention for psychiatric disorders, yet its clinical efficacy remains underexplored due to an incomplete mechanistic understanding. This study aimed to delineate the whole-brain mechanisms underpinning the effects of rtfMRI-NF on repetitive negative thinking in depression. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, forty-three depressed individuals underwent NF training targeting the functional connectivity (FC) between the posterior cingulate cortex and the right temporoparietal junction, linked to rumination severity. Participants were randomly assigned to active or sham groups, with the sham group receiving synthesized feedback mimicking real NF signal patterns. The active group demonstrated a significant reduction in brooding rumination scores (d = -1.52, p < 0.001), whereas the sham group did not (d = -0.23, p = 0.503). While the target FC did not show discernible training effects or group differences, connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) analysis revealed that the interaction between brain activity during regulation and brain response to the feedback signal was the critical factor in explaining treatment outcomes. The model incorporating this interaction successfully predicted rumination changes across both groups. The FCs significantly contributing to the prediction were distributed across brain regions, notably the frontal control, salience network, and subcortical reward processing areas. These results underscore the importance of considering the interplay between brain regulation activities and brain response to the feedback signal in understanding the therapeutic mechanisms of rtfMRI-NF. The study affirms rtfMRI-NF's potential as a therapeutic intervention for repetitive negative thinking and highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of the whole-brain mechanisms contributing to its efficacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39227376
doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03066-9
pii: 10.1038/s41398-024-03066-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

354

Subventions

Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
ID : 1P20GM121312
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
ID : 1P20GM121312

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Taylor SF, Martz ME. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: the promising potential of brain-training technology to advance clinical neuroscience. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023;48:238–9.
pubmed: 35915228 doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01397-z
Pindi P, Houenou J, Piguet C, Favre P. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback as a new treatment for psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022;119:110605.
pubmed: 35843369 doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110605
Goldway N, Jalon I, Keynan JN, Hellrung L, Horstmann A, Paret C, et al. Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;138:104694.
pubmed: 35623447 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104694
Fernandez-Alvarez J, Grassi M, Colombo D, Botella C, Cipresso P, Perna G, et al. Efficacy of bio- and neurofeedback for depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2022;52:201–16.
pubmed: 34776024 doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004396
Girges C, Vijiaratnam N, Zrinzo L, Ekanayake J, Foltynie T. Volitional control of brain motor activity and its therapeutic potential. Neuromodulation. 2022;25:1187–96.
pubmed: 35241365 doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.01.007
Dudek E, Dodell-Feder D. The efficacy of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for psychiatric illness: a meta-analysis of brain and behavioral outcomes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;121:291–306.
pubmed: 33370575 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.020
Trambaiolli LR, Kohl SH, Linden DEJ, Mehler DMA. Neurofeedback training in major depressive disorder: a systematic review of clinical efficacy, study quality and reporting practices. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;125:33–56.
pubmed: 33587957 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.015
Martz ME, Hart T, Heitzeg MM, Peltier SJ. Neuromodulation of brain activation associated with addiction: a review of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies. NeuroImage Clin. 2020;27:102350.
pubmed: 32736324 pmcid: 7394772 doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102350
Barreiros AR, Almeida I, Baia BC, Castelo-Branco M. Amygdala modulation during emotion regulation training with fMRI-based neurofeedback. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:89.
pubmed: 30971906 pmcid: 6444080 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00089
Hampson M. Identifying potential mechanisms of action underlying neurofeedback treatment response in depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;82:547–8.
pubmed: 28935097 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.07.001
Emmert K, Kopel R, Sulzer J, Bruhl AB, Berman BD, Linden DEJ, et al. Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: How is brain regulation mediated? Neuroimage. 2016;124:806–12. (Pt A)
pubmed: 26419389 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.042
Zotev V, Phillips R, Misaki M, Wong CK, Wurfel BE, Krueger F, et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of the amygdala activity with simultaneous EEG in veterans with combat-related PTSD. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;19:106–21.
pubmed: 30035008 pmcid: 6051473 doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.010
Herwig U, Lutz J, Scherpiet S, Scheerer H, Kohlberg J, Opialla S, et al. Training emotion regulation through real-time fMRI neurofeedback of amygdala activity. Neuroimage. 2019;184:687–96.
pubmed: 30287300 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.068
Paret C, Zahringer J, Ruf M, Gerchen MF, Mall S, Hendler T, et al. Monitoring and control of amygdala neurofeedback involves distributed information processing in the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39:3018–31.
pubmed: 29602255 pmcid: 6866431 doi: 10.1002/hbm.24057
Lubianiker N, Paret C, Dayan P, Hendler T. Neurofeedback through the lens of reinforcement learning. Trends Neurosci. 2022;45:579–93.
pubmed: 35550813 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.03.008
Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J, et al. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:86–100.
pubmed: 28003656 doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164
Lawrence EJ, Su L, Barker GJ, Medford N, Dalton J, Williams SC, et al. Self-regulation of the anterior insula: reinforcement learning using real-time fMRI neurofeedback. Neuroimage. 2014;88:113–24.
pubmed: 24231399 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.069
Skottnik L, Sorger B, Kamp T, Linden D, Goebel R. Success and failure of controlling the real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback signal are reflected in the striatum. Brain Behav. 2019;9:e01240.
pubmed: 30790474 pmcid: 6422826 doi: 10.1002/brb3.1240
Gaume A, Vialatte A, Mora-Sanchez A, Ramdani C, Vialatte FB. A psychoengineering paradigm for the neurocognitive mechanisms of biofeedback and neurofeedback. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:891–910.
pubmed: 27339691 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.012
Linhartova P, Latalova A, Kosa B, Kasparek T, Schmahl C, Paret C. fMRI neurofeedback in emotion regulation: a literature review. Neuroimage. 2019;193:75–92.
pubmed: 30862532 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.011
Etkin A, Buchel C, Gross JJ. The neural bases of emotion regulation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:693–700.
pubmed: 26481098 doi: 10.1038/nrn4044
Tsuchiyagaito A, Misaki M, Kirlic N, Yu X, Sanchez SM, Cochran G, et al. Real-time fMRI functional Connectivity Neurofeedback reducing repetitive negative thinking in depression: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled proof-of-concept trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2023;92:87–100.
pubmed: 36630946 doi: 10.1159/000528377
Kvamme TL, Ros T, Overgaard M. Can neurofeedback provide evidence of direct brain-behavior causality? Neuroimage. 2022;258:119400.
pubmed: 35728786 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119400
Misaki M, Phillips R, Zotev V, Wong CK, Wurfel BE, Krueger F, et al. Brain activity mediators of PTSD symptom reduction during real-time fMRI amygdala neurofeedback emotional training. NeuroImage Clin. 2019;24:102047.
pubmed: 31711031 pmcid: 6849428 doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102047
Sukhodolsky DG, Walsh C, Koller WN, Eilbott J, Rance M, Fulbright RK, et al. Randomized, sham-controlled trial of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for tics in adolescents with Tourette syndrome. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87:1063–70.
pubmed: 31668476 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.07.035
Shen X, Finn ES, Scheinost D, Rosenberg MD, Chun MM, Papademetris X, et al. Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity. Nat, Protoc. 2017;12:506–18.
pubmed: 28182017 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.178
Taxali A, Angstadt M, Rutherford S, Sripada C. Boost in test-retest reliability in resting state fMRI with predictive modeling. Cereb Cortex. 2021;31:2822–33.
pubmed: 33447841 pmcid: 8599720 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa390
Finn ES, Rosenberg MD. Beyond fingerprinting: choosing predictive connectomes over reliable connectomes. Neuroimage. 2021;239:118254.
pubmed: 34118397 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118254
Rosenberg MD, Finn ES. How to establish robust brain-behavior relationships without thousands of individuals. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:835–7.
pubmed: 35710985 doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01110-9
Misaki M, Bodurka J, Paulus MP. A library for fMRI real-time processing systems in python (RTPSpy) with comprehensive online noise reduction, fast and accurate anatomical image processing, and online processing simulation. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:834827.
pubmed: 35360171 pmcid: 8963181 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.834827
Weiss F, Zamoscik V, Schmidt SNL, Halli P, Kirsch P, Gerchen MF. Just a very expensive breathing training? Risk of respiratory artefacts in functional connectivity-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback. Neuroimage. 2020;210:116580.
pubmed: 31987998 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116580
Misaki M, Bodurka J. The impact of real-time fMRI denoising on online evaluation of brain activity and functional connectivity. J Neural Eng. 2021;18:046092.
Misaki M, Tsuchiyagaito A, Al Zoubi O, Paulus M, Bodurka J, Tulsa I. Connectome-wide search for functional connectivity locus associated with pathological rumination as a target for real-time fMRI neurofeedback intervention. NeuroImage Clin. 2020;26:102244.
pubmed: 32193171 pmcid: 7082218 doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102244
Ramot M, Kimmich S, Gonzalez-Castillo J, Roopchansingh V, Popal H, White E, et al. Direct modulation of aberrant brain network connectivity through real-time NeuroFeedback. Elife. 2017;6:e28974.
pubmed: 28917059 pmcid: 5626477 doi: 10.7554/eLife.28974
Rissman J, Gazzaley A, D’Esposito M. Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task. Neuroimage. 2004;23:752–63.
pubmed: 15488425 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.035
Shen X, Tokoglu F, Papademetris X, Constable RT. Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification. Neuroimage. 2013;82:403–15.
pubmed: 23747961 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.081
Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61:115–21.
pubmed: 1890582 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115
Treynor W, Gonzalez R, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis. Cogn Ther Res. 2003;27:247–59.
doi: 10.1023/A:1023910315561
Winkler AM, Ridgway GR, Webster MA, Smith SM, Nichols TE. Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage. 2014;92:381–97.
pubmed: 24530839 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82:1–26.
doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans . Accessed 2022.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2022. http://www.R-project.org . Accessed 2022.
Ninaus M, Kober SE, Witte M, Koschutnig K, Stangl M, Neuper C, et al. Neural substrates of cognitive control under the belief of getting neurofeedback training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:914.
pubmed: 24421765 pmcid: 3872730 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00914
Scheinost D, Hsu TW, Avery EW, Hampson M, Constable RT, Chun MM, et al. Connectome-based neurofeedback: a pilot study to improve sustained attention. Neuroimage. 2020;212:116684.
pubmed: 32114151 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116684
Ciarlo A, Russo AG, Ponticorvo S, di Salle F, Lührs M, Goebel R, et al. Semantic fMRI neurofeedback: a multi-subject study at 3 tesla. J Neural Eng. 2022;19:036020.
doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac6f81
Shibata K, Lisi G, Cortese A, Watanabe T, Sasaki Y, Kawato M. Toward a comprehensive understanding of the neural mechanisms of decoded neurofeedback. Neuroimage. 2019;188:539–56.
pubmed: 30572110 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.022
Pecina M, Chen J, Karp JF, Dombrovski AY. Dynamic feedback between antidepressant placebo expectancies and mood. JAMA psychiatry. 2023;80:389–98.
pubmed: 36857039 pmcid: 9979016 doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0010
Kober SE, Witte M, Grinschgl S, Neuper C, Wood G. Placebo hampers ability to self-regulate brain activity: a double-blind sham-controlled neurofeedback study. Neuroimage. 2018;181:797–806.
pubmed: 30010005 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.025
Thibault RT, Lifshitz M, Raz A. Neurofeedback or neuroplacebo? Brain. 2017;140:862–4.
pubmed: 28375458 doi: 10.1093/brain/awx033
Salk RH, Hyde JS, Abramson LY. Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. Psychol Bull. 2017;143:783–822.
pubmed: 28447828 pmcid: 5532074 doi: 10.1037/bul0000102
Lees B, Meredith LR, Kirkland AE, Bryant BE, Squeglia LM. Effect of alcohol use on the adolescent brain and behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020;192:172906.
pubmed: 32179028 pmcid: 7183385 doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.172906
Drysdale AT, Grosenick L, Downar J, Dunlop K, Mansouri F, Meng Y, et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med. 2017;23:28–38.
pubmed: 27918562 doi: 10.1038/nm.4246

Auteurs

Masaya Misaki (M)

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. mmisaki@laureateinstitute.org.
Oxley College of Health & Natural Sciences, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA. mmisaki@laureateinstitute.org.

Aki Tsuchiyagaito (A)

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Oxley College of Health & Natural Sciences, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Salvador M Guinjoan (SM)

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center at Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Michael L Rohan (ML)

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Martin P Paulus (MP)

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH