Antithrombotic utilization, adverse events, and associations with treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: pooled analysis of three clinical trials.

Background

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), worsened by immunomodulatory drugs. Although antithrombotics are recommended for prophylaxis, existing guidelines are suboptimal and treatment outcomes remain unclear.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate adverse events, antithrombotic utilization, and their associations with survival outcomes in patients with MM initiating multi-drug immunomodulatory combinations.

Design

A posthoc analysis of individual-participant level data (IPD).

Methods

IPD from three daratumumab clinical trials (MAIA, POLLUX, and CASTOR) were pooled. Adverse events incidence and antithrombotic utilization were assessed. Logistic and Cox regression were utilized to examine associations between antithrombotics use with adverse events and survival outcomes at the baseline and 6-month landmark.

Results

Among 1804 patients, VTE occurred in 10%, bleeding in 14%, ischemic heart disease in 4%, and stroke in 2%. Patients with these adverse events demonstrated elevated rates of any grade ⩾3 events. Antiplatelet (primarily aspirin) and anticoagulant (primarily LMWH and direct oral anticoagulants) prescriptions have seen an increase from baseline (25% and 14%, respectively) to 6 months (35% and 31%). The primary indication for their use was prophylaxis. Anticoagulant use within 6 months was associated with reduced VTE (OR (95% CI) = 0.45 (0.26-0.77),

Conclusion

This study underscores the complexities of antithrombotic therapy and adverse events in MM and highlights the need for vigilant and proactive management due to increased grade ⩾3 adverse events. While anticoagulant use was associated with reduced VTE risk, further research is needed to optimize thromboprophylaxis guidelines and explore antithrombotic efficacy and safety in patients with MM.

Trial registration

MAIA (NCT02252172), POLLUX (NCT02076009), CASTOR (NCT02136134).

Blood clot prevention drugs in multiple myeloma: usage and impact on patient outcomes Aims and Purpose of the Research This study aimed to understand how blood-thinning medications are used by patients with multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer. Specifically, we wanted to find out how often these medications are used, what side effects they might cause, and whether they are linked with how long the patients live. Background of the Research This study is important because patients with multiple myeloma often have a higher risk of blood clots, especially when they are taking certain anticancer treatments. Blood-thinning drugs are usually recommended to prevent these clots, but it’s not always clear how well these drugs work or what side effects they might cause. Methods and Research Design This study looked at data from three clinical trials involving a multiple myeloma drug called daratumumab. We looked at how often side effects occurred and how often blood-thinning drugs were used. Two groups of blood thinning drugs were investigated: antiplatelets and anticoagulants. We used two types of statistical methods, called logistic and Cox regression, to see if there was a connection between the use of these blood-thinning drugs and the occurrence of side effects or survival rates at the start of the study and after six months. Results and Importance The study found that the use of blood-thinning drugs increased over time and that using anticoagulants within the first six months was linked to a lower risk of blood clots. However, blood-thinning drugs were not linked with how long the patients lived. These results are important because they can help doctors better manage the use of blood-thinning drugs in patients with multiple myeloma. The key message is that more research is needed to improve guidelines for preventing blood clots and to better understand the safety and effectiveness of blood-thinning drugs in these patients.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

HOA is on the advisory board of ROCHE, MSD, BMS, ASTRAZENECA, and Novartis. All other authors have no competing interests to disclose.