Theory Use in Project Management Research: An Exploratory Content Analysis Approach.

content analysis exploratory research literature review project management theoretical orientation theory

Journal

Evaluation review
ISSN: 1552-3926
Titre abrégé: Eval Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8004942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 4 9 2024
pubmed: 4 9 2024
entrez: 4 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The frequency and richness of the theories developed, tested, and used by researchers in an academic discipline exemplify several pertinent factors, namely, the growth, the maturity, the independence, the legitimacy, and the influence of the discipline. Although organizations have been working on projects for centuries, Project Management (PM) is a considerably new academic discipline with emerging research themes, models, methodologies, frameworks, and paradigms. These PM concepts are anchored on or reinforced by new or existing theories. This exploratory study aims to add to the existing PM body of knowledge by investigating the prevalence of theory use in PM research. A systematic content analysis of 9200 PM research articles published from 2000 to 2019 (20 years) in the leading PM journals identified 248 unique theories. These results reveal that the PM discipline is increasingly embracing the use of theories with game theory, fuzzy theory, agency theory, contingency theory, and stakeholder theory emerging as the most dominant theories in the reviewed research articles. Also, although PM is developing its theories, the results revealed that PM researchers continue to heavily use theories borrowed from other academic disciplines such as psychology, sociology, mathematics, and economics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39229774
doi: 10.1177/0193841X241279706
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

193841X241279706

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Erastus Karanja (E)

School of Business, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA.

Jigish Zaveri (J)

Earl. G. Graves School of Business & Management, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Angela K Miles (AK)

School of Business, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA.

Steven Day (S)

School of Business, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA.

Classifications MeSH