Whole-Body Multiparametric PET in Clinical Oncology: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.


Journal

AJR. American journal of roentgenology
ISSN: 1546-3141
Titre abrégé: AJR Am J Roentgenol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7708173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 4 9 2024
pubmed: 4 9 2024
entrez: 4 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The interpretation of clinical oncologic PET studies has historically used static reconstructions based on SUVs. SUVs and SUV-based images have important limitations, including dependence on uptake times and reduced conspicuity of tracer-avid lesions in organs with high background uptake. The acquisition of dynamic PET images enables additional PET reconstructions via Patlak modeling, which assumes that a tracer is irreversibly trapped by tissues of interest. The resulting multiparametric PET images capture a tracer's net trapping rate (Ki) and apparent volume of distribution (VD), separating the contributions of bound and free tracer fractions to the PET signal captured in the SUV. Potential benefits of multiparametric PET include higher quantitative stability, superior lesion conspicuity, and greater accuracy for differentiating malignant and benign lesions. However, the imaging protocols necessary for multiparametric PET are inherently more complex and time-intensive, despite the recent introduction of automated or semiautomated scanner-based reconstruction packages. In this Review, we examine the current state of multiparametric PET in whole-body oncologic imaging. We summarize the Patlak methodology and relevant tracer kinetics, discuss clinical workflows and protocol considerations, and highlight clinical challenges and opportunities. We aim to help oncologic imagers make informed decisions about whether to implement multiparametric PET in their clinical practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39230403
doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.31712
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Tyler J Fraum (TJ)

Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Hasan Sari (H)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Siemens Healthineers International AG, 8047, Zurich, Switzerland.

André H Dias (AH)

Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul-Jensens Blvd 165, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.

Ole L Munk (OL)

Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle-Juul-Jensens Blvd 165, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle-Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.

Thomas Pyka (T)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
TUM School of Medicine and Health, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Anne M Smith (AM)

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., 810 Innovation Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37932, USA.

Osama R Mawlawi (OR)

Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Richard Laforest (R)

Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Guobao Wang (G)

Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Health, 4860 Y St, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

Classifications MeSH