Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose, Rapidly Infused Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab: Phase 3 BLAZE-1 Trial for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19.

BLAZE-1 Bamlanivimab COVID-19 Clinical trial Etesevimab Treatment

Journal

Infectious diseases and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8229
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634499

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 13 05 2024
accepted: 05 08 2024
medline: 4 9 2024
pubmed: 4 9 2024
entrez: 4 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The monoclonal antibody therapies bamlanivimab (BAM) + etesevimab (ETE) received emergency use authorization (EUA) from the US Food and Drug Administration (February 9, 2021) for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The EUA of BAM + ETE was revoked (December 14, 2023) due to the high prevalence of BAM + ETE-resistant variants of SARS-CoV-2. Efficacy and safety of 700/1400 mg and 2800/2800 mg BAM + ETE are well established and published; however, efficacy and safety of 350/700 mg BAM + ETE have not been disclosed to date. This portion of phase 3, BLAZE-1 trial (J2X-MC-PYAB) enrolled patients (between June 17, 2020 and April 9, 2021) with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 within 3 days of laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 354 patients with at least one risk factor for severe COVID-19 were enrolled, randomized (2:3), and infused with placebo (N = 141) or 350/700 mg BAM + ETE (N = 213), over ~ 8 min. Primary endpoint was to assess proportion of patients with persistently high SARS-CoV-2 viral load (PHVL) (log viral load > 5.27) 7 days after infusion. Patients were aged (mean) 53 years, 49.7% female, and 82.7% White. Seven days after drug infusion, 10.8% (95% confidence interval: 6.6, 15.0; p < 0.001) of BAM + ETE-treated patients and 34.8% (26.9, 42.6) of placebo-treated patients had PHVL, and the viral load change from baseline (least square mean [standard error]) was - 3.50 (0.15; p < 0.001) in BAM + ETE-treated patients versus - 2.51 (0.19) in placebo-treated patients. The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were considered mild or moderate in severity (BAM + ETE: 6.6%; placebo: 14.2%). No deaths were reported. Consistent with previous studies, patients treated with BAM + ETE (350/700 mg) had a significantly lower proportion of PHVL and greater reduction in viral load compared with placebo. The overall safety profile is consistent with higher doses of BAM + ETE. Infusions of over ~ 8 min did not result in meaningful increase in incidence of TEAEs compared to higher doses of BAM + ETE administered over 30-60 min. Clinical trial.gov identifier, NCT04427501.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39230829
doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01031-z
pii: 10.1007/s40121-024-01031-z
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04427501']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. National Institute of Health. Available: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/anti-sars-cov-2-antibody-products/anti-sars-cov-2-monoclonal-antibodies/ . Accessed 31 Mar 2022.
Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science. 2020;367:1444–8.
doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762 pubmed: 32132184 pmcid: 7164635
Wang Q, Zhang Y, Wu L, et al. Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2. Cell. 2020;181(894–904):e9.
Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003;426:450–4.
doi: 10.1038/nature02145 pubmed: 14647384 pmcid: 7095016
Benton DJ, Wrobel AG, Xu P, et al. Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion. Nature. 2020;588:327–30.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2772-0 pubmed: 32942285 pmcid: 7116727
Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab. 2023. Available https://aspr.hhs.gov/COVID-19/Therapeutics/Products/Bamlanivimab-etesevimab/Pages/default.aspx . Accessed 22 Apr 2024.
Fact sheet for health care providers Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of bamlanivimab and etesevimab. Food and Drug Administration, 2021. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/145802/download . Accessed 22 Feb 2022.
Dougan M, Nirula A, Azizad M, et al. Bamlanivimab plus etesevimab in mild or moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1382–92.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102685 pubmed: 34260849
Dougan M, Azizad M, Mocherla B, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of bamlanivimab and etesevimab together in high-risk ambulatory patients with COVID-19 and validation of the prognostic value of persistently high viral load. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;75:e440–9.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab912 pmcid: 9402688
Behr CL, Joynt Maddox KE, Meara E, Epstein AM, Orav EJ, Barnett ML. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody distribution to high-risk Medicare beneficiaries, 2020–2021. JAMA. 2022;327:980–3.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1243 pubmed: 35119452 pmcid: 8904305
Nichols RM, Macpherson L, Patel DR, Yeh WW, Peppercorn A. Effect of bamlanivimab as monotherapy or in combination with etesevimab or sotrovimab on persistently high viral load in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: a randomized, phase 2 BLAZE-4 trial. Infect Dis Ther. 2024;13(2):401–11.
doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-00918-1 pubmed: 38291279 pmcid: 10904692
IV PUSH VS IV INFUSION: WHICH ONE’S BETTER? 2017. Available: https://www.vitamininjections.co.uk/iv-push-vs-iv-infusion-which-is-better/ . Accessed 7 Feb 2024.
Gottlieb RL, Nirula A, Chen P, et al. Effect of bamlanivimab as monotherapy or in combination with etesevimab on viral load in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(7):632–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.0202
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0202 pubmed: 33475701 pmcid: 7821080
Guidance for industry. Covid-19: developing drugs and biological products for treatment or prevention. Food and Drug Administration, 2020. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/137926/download . Accessed 3 Oct 2021.
Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates Get access Arrow. Biometrika. 1993;80:27–38.
doi: 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
Sheward DJ, Kim C, Ehling RA, et al. Neutralisation sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(6):813–20.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00129-3 pubmed: 35305699 pmcid: 8930016
VanBlargan LA, Errico JM, Halfmann PJ, et al. An infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron virus escapes neutralization by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Nat Med. 2022;28(3):490–5.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01678-y pubmed: 35046573 pmcid: 8767531

Auteurs

Dipak R Patel (DR)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Lisa Macpherson (L)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Martin Bohm (M)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Himanshu Upadhyaya (H)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Carmen Deveau (C)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Ajay Nirula (A)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Paul Klekotka (P)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Mark Williams (M)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA.

Matthew M Hufford (MM)

Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN, 46220, USA. hufford_matthew@lilly.com.

Classifications MeSH