Electroencephalographic compatibility with fitness to drive: A nationwide survey among Swiss neurologists.
electroencephalography
evaluation
fitness to drive
guidelines
inter‐rater agreement
survey
Journal
Epilepsia open
ISSN: 2470-9239
Titre abrégé: Epilepsia Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692036
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
revised:
07
08
2024
received:
23
04
2024
accepted:
21
08
2024
medline:
4
9
2024
pubmed:
4
9
2024
entrez:
4
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The Swiss guidelines for driving with epilepsy require that electroencephalogram (EEG) findings must be compatible with the fitness to drive (FTD) without specifying any criteria. This nationwide survey investigated how Swiss neurologists implement this requirement in clinical practice. An online survey, including 19 EEG examples and statements about the compatibility of the EEG with FTD, was distributed to all members of the Swiss Society of Clinical Neurophysiology and all Swiss neurological clinics with residency programs. Descriptive statistics and Fleiss' Kappa for inter-rater agreement were performed. 102 participants (37% female, 45% <45 years) completed the survey, with 15% primarily working in a specialized epileptology center (EPI), 55% in a hospital setting without epileptological focus (HOS), and 30% in private practice (PP). Most participants of all three groups regarded EEG normal variants as compatible with FTD, while hyperventilation-induced rhythmic slowing and some pathological patterns (e.g., frontal and temporal intermittent rhythmic delta activity [FIRDA, TIRDA], focal interictal epileptiform discharges [IED], focal seizure) were evaluated more heterogeneously. The EEG inter-rater agreement for EPI was 0.4; 0.31 for PP; and 0.24 for HOS. No consensus was found for acceptable duration for generalized or focal IEDs. Among all participants, evaluation by an epilepsy center (85%) and reaction-time testing (67%) were evaluated as the most useful additional examinations. However, reaction-time testing is rarely or never performed by 58%. Most supported EEG results as part of the FTD assessment and demanded more research (both 82%). Our survey indicates considerable heterogeneity among Swiss neurologists when evaluating the EEG findings for FTD. Inter-rater agreement in all three groups was fair, with highest agreement among epileptologists. We noted a discrepancy between the usefulness and actual application of reaction-time testing. More training and research are warranted to achieve rater-independent consistency for FTD evaluation. In Switzerland, neurologists must consider the findings from EEG (brain waves) exams to evaluate driving safety in people with epilepsy. We surveyed Swiss neurologists, asking their opinions on this matter. We found that opinions differ among individual doctors, with the highest agreement among epilepsy specialists. We also found that some additional tests, such as reaction-time testing, are perceived as useful but are rarely performed. The participating neurologists supported considering EEG results for driving fitness assessments but favored more precise guidelines and research.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
Organisme : Andre et Michel Bouriez Foundation
Organisme : Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Références
Beghi E, Giussani G, Nichols E, Abd‐Allah F, Abdela J, Abdelalim A, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(4):357–375. [cited 2024 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474‐4422(18)30454‐X/fulltext
Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, et al. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55(4):475–482. [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.12550
Möller L, Krämer G, Habermehl L, Menzler K, Knake S. Driving regulations for epilepsy in Europe. Seizure Eur J Epilepsy. 2023;109:83–91. [cited 2023 Nov 27]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1059131123001486
Schmedding E. Driving regulations task force | IBE epilepsy [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2024 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.ibe‐epilepsy.org/driving‐regulations‐task‐force‐2/
Ooi WW, Gutrecht JA. International regulations for automobile driving and epilepsy. J Travel Med. 2006 [cited 2024 Jan 27];7(1):1–4. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jtm/article‐lookup/doi/10.2310/7060.2000.00001
Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency. At a glance guide to the current medical standards of fitness to drive [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2023 Dec 5]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1084397/assessing‐fitness‐to‐drive‐may‐2022.pdf
Austroads, National Transport Commission Australia. Assessing fitness to drive for commercial and private vehicle drivers—medical standards for licensing and clinical management guidelines. 2022.
Arnold P, Bonetti C, Mathis J, Meyer K, Seeck M, Seeger R, et al. Fahreignung mit Epilepsie. Swiss Med Forum–Schweiz Med‐Forum. 2019;19(4546):737–740. [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://doi.emh.ch/smf.2019.08402
Markhus R, Henning O, Molteberg E, Hećimović H, Ujvari A, Hirsch E, et al. EEG in fitness to drive evaluations in people with epilepsy—considerable variations across Europe. Seizure. 2020;79:56–60. [cited 2023 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131120301205
Antwi P, Atac E, Ryu JH, Arencibia CA, Tomatsu S, Saleem N, et al. Driving status of patients with generalized spike‐wave on EEG but no clinical seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;92:5–13.
Krestel H, Schreier DR, Sakiri E, Von Allmen A, Abukhadra Y, Nirkko A, et al. Predictive power of interictal epileptiform discharges in fitness‐to‐drive evaluation. Neurology. 2023;101(9):e866–e878. [cited 2023 Oct 24]. Available from: http://www.neurology.org/lookup/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207531
Kang JY, Mintzer S. Driving and epilepsy: a review of important issues. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16(9):80.
Classen S, Crizzle AM, Winter SM, Silver W, Eisenschenk S. Evidence‐based review on epilepsy and driving. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;23(2):103–112.
Halford JJ, Arain A, Kalamangalam GP, LaRoche SM, Leonardo B, Basha M, et al. Characteristics of EEG interpreters associated with higher interrater agreement. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(2):168–173. [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00004691‐201703000‐00012
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159 [cited 2023 Oct 24] Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310?origin=crossref
Nascimento FA, Jing J, Beniczky S, Benbadis SR, Gavvala JR, Yacubian EMT, et al. One EEG, one read—a manifesto towards reducing interrater variability among experts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022;133:68–70. [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1388245721007756
Jing J, Herlopian A, Karakis I, Ng M, Halford JJ, Lam A, et al. Interrater reliability of experts in identifying interictal epileptiform discharges in electroencephalograms. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(1):49 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2752670
Jing J, Ge W, Struck AF, Fernandes MB, Hong S, An S, et al. Interrater reliability of expert electroencephalographers identifying seizures and rhythmic and periodic patterns in EEGs. Neurology. 2023;100(17):e1737–e1749. [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201670
Acharya JN, Acharya VJ. Hyperventilation‐induced EEG slowing with altered awareness: non‐epileptic, epileptic or both? Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021;6:189–190. [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2467981X21000275
Rodriguez Ruiz A, Vlachy J, Lee JW, Gilmore EJ, Ayer T, Haider HA, et al. Association of periodic and rhythmic electroencephalographic patterns with seizures in critically ill patients. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(2):181 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4990
Amin U, Nascimento FA, Karakis I, Schomer D, Benbadis SR. Normal variants and artifacts: importance in EEG interpretation. Epileptic Disord. 2023;25(5):591–648. [cited 2024 Mar 27]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epd2.20040
Gaspard N, Manganas L, Rampal N, Petroff OAC, Hirsch LJ. Similarity of lateralized rhythmic delta activity to periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges in critically ill patients. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(10):1288–1295.
Freund BE, Mheir‐Al‐Saadi Z, Brinkmann BH, Tatum WO. “Temporal” intermittent rhythmic delta activity: the true localizing nature of TIRDA. Epileptic Disord Int Epilepsy J Videotape. 2022;24(5):947–951.
Geyer JD, Bilir E, Faught RE, Kuzniecky R, Gilliam F. Significance of interictal temporal lobe delta activity for localization of the primary epileptogenic region. Neurology. 1999;52(1):202–205.
Beniczky S, Tatum WO, Blumenfeld H, Stefan H, Mani J, Maillard L, et al. Seizure semiology: ILAE glossary of terms and their significance. Epileptic Disord Int Epilepsy J Videotape. 2022;24(3):447–495.
Lux S, Kurthen M, Helmstaedter C, Hartje W, Reuber M, Elger CE. The localizing value of ictal consciousness and its constituent functions: a video‐EEG study in patients with focal epilepsy. Brain J Neurol. 2002;125(Pt 12):2691–2698.
Kasteleijn‐Nolst Trenité DGA, Riemersma JBJ, Binnie CD, Smit AM, Meinardi H. The influence of subclinical epileptiform EEG discharges on driving behaviour. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;67(2):167–170. [cited 2023 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001346948790040X
Kasteleijn‐Nolst Trenité DG, Vermeiren R. The impact of subclinical epileptiform discharges on complex tasks and cognition: relevance for aircrew and air traffic controllers. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;6(1):31–34. [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525505004003063
Cohen E, Antwi P, Banz BC, Vincent P, Saha R, Arencibia CA, et al. Realistic driving simulation during generalized epileptiform discharges to identify electroencephalographic features related to motor vehicle safety: feasibility and pilot study. Epilepsia. 2020;61(1):19–28.
Krestel HE, Nirkko A, von Allmen A, Liechti C, Wettstein J, Mosbacher A, et al. Spike‐triggered reaction‐time EEG as a possible assessment tool for driving ability. Epilepsia. 2011;52(10):e126–e129. [cited 2023 Jan 23]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1528‐1167.2011.03252.x
Chen WC, Chen EY, Gebre RZ, Johnson MR, Li N, Vitkovskiy P, et al. Epilepsy and driving: potential impact of transient impaired consciousness. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;30:50–57. [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525505013004903
Kumar A, Martin R, Chen W, Bauerschmidt A, Youngblood MW, Cunningham C, et al. Simulated driving in the epilepsy monitoring unit: effects of seizure type, consciousness, and motor impairment. Epilepsia. 2022;63(1):e30–e34.