Breaking down barriers: live or dehydrated dietary whole black soldier fly larvae supplementation in slow growing chickens preserve meat quality and sensory traits.

alternative farming insect poultry whole larvae

Journal

Poultry science
ISSN: 1525-3171
Titre abrégé: Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 29 05 2024
revised: 12 07 2024
accepted: 24 07 2024
medline: 5 9 2024
pubmed: 5 9 2024
entrez: 4 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study investigated the effects of supplementing the diet of a slow-growing autochthonous chicken breed with dehydrated or live Black Soldier Fly Larvae (BSFL) on meat quality and sensory attributes. The research, conducted at the University of Turin, Italy, involved 144 male birds distributed in three experimental groups. The control group (C) was fed a basal diet in which soybean meal was completely substituted with alternative ingredients. The 2 experimental groups were administered a diet identical to the control group but supplemented with either whole dehydrated black soldier fly larvae (DL) or whole live black soldier fly larvae (LL) at a level equal to 5% expected daily feed intake of dry matter. We evaluated the following parameters: nutrient intake, slaughtering performance, physical and nutritional meat quality, fatty acid composition, proteomics, and sensory characteristics. The results demonstrated BSFL supplementation to have no detrimental effects on overall meat quality or sensory attributes. Specifically, there were no significant differences in physical meat quality parameters, nutritional composition, lipid oxidation, or protein digestibility between control and BSFL-fed groups. Fatty acid analysis revealed higher concentrations of lauric and myristic acids in BSFL-fed chicken breast (p < 0.005), suggesting potential nutritional benefits from the supplement. The proteomic analysis also showed no significant differences in the expression of abundant proteins in the breast meat between groups, indicating minimal physiological impact of BSFL supplementation. Overall, this study provides reassurance to consumers and industries about the suitability of BSFL as a sustainable feed supplement for poultry that also offers potential benefits in terms of optimizing the fatty acid profile of chicken meat.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39232306
pii: S0032-5791(24)00699-0
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104120
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104120

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

DISCLOSURES The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Edoardo Fiorilla (E)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Marta Gariglio (M)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Francesco Gai (F)

Institute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Turin, Italy. Electronic address: francesco.gai@ispa.cnr.it.

Valeria Zambotto (V)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Turin, Italy.

Valentina Bongiorno (V)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Eleonora Erika Cappone (EE)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Rune Rødbotten (R)

Nofima AS-Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Ås, Norway.

Shiori Koga (S)

Nofima AS-Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Ås, Norway.

Anne Rieder (A)

Nofima AS-Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Ås, Norway.

Erik Tengstrand (E)

Nofima AS-Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Ås, Norway.

Sara Pozzo (S)

Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Milan, Italy.

Giulia Maria Daniele (GM)

Institute for BioEconomy, National Research Council, Bologna Italy.

Marta Cianciabella (M)

Institute for BioEconomy, National Research Council, Bologna Italy.

Stefano Predieri (S)

Institute for BioEconomy, National Research Council, Bologna Italy.

Claudio Forte (C)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Achille Schiavone (A)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, Turin, Italy.

Classifications MeSH