[Effects of a return-to -home assistance programm (PRADO-IC) on the patient journey in a cohort of cardiac heart failure patients].
Effets du programme d'aide au retour à domicile (PRADO-IC) sur le parcours de soins à un an d'une population de patients insuffisants cardiaques.
Health education programs
Heart Failure
Insuffisance cardiaque
PRADO-IC
Patient education as a subject
Programme d’éducation à la santé
Éducation thérapeutique
Journal
Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie
ISSN: 1768-3181
Titre abrégé: Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris)
Pays: France
ID NLM: 0142167
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Sep 2024
03 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
26
06
2024
accepted:
02
07
2024
medline:
5
9
2024
pubmed:
5
9
2024
entrez:
4
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Congestive heart failure (HF) is associated with prolonged and recurrent hospitalizations; the prognosis remains poor a better follow up might be beneficial. PRADO-IC program is provided in order to improve the transition of care. To evaluate PRADO-IC program in term of healthcare consumption and prognosis in a cohort of patients hospitalized for decompensated HF, using the insight of the national data base SNDS (Système National de Données de Santé). From September 2016 to September 2018, all patients hospitalized for heart failure at Saint-Joseph Hospital were included in an observational study. The inclusion in the PRADO-IC program was at physician's discretion. Two groups were compared according to the inclusion in PRADO-IC (P group) or not (control group (C)). The primary endpoints were the comparison of one-year mortality and heart failure readmission rate between the two groups. The secondary end points were time to the first contact with a general practitioner (GP), a cardiologist, CHF drugs prescription, and others follow up data. Six hundred and fifteen patients were included, 254 in the P group and 361 in the C group. Patients in the P cohort presented more frequently severity criteria (age, weight, BNP level, arrhythmia, anemia, renal failure). Mortality at one year (n = 47; 18.5% P group vs. n = 65; 16.2% C group, p = 0.87) did not differ in both groups. There was no significant difference in one-year re-hospitalization rate for HF (n = 93, 36.6% in P group vs. n = 133, 26.8% in C group, p = 0.95). Time to the first contact with the GP was shorter in P group (8.00 vs. 18.50 days, p < 0.0001). Time to first hospitalization (69.0 vs. 37.0 days, p = 0.028) and the length of hospitalization (6.0 vs. 4.0 days, p = 0.045) were longer in P group. There was no difference for HF drugs prescription rate between the two groups. Our study shows that the PRADO-IC program concerned more severe patients. Despite this, the one-year mortality and the HF readmission rates are similar between the two groups. The follow up is improved in P group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39232335
pii: S0003-3928(24)00066-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2024.101787
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
English Abstract
Journal Article
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101787Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Déclaration de liens Conflit d'intérêts Les auteurs déclarent n'avoir aucun lien d'intérêt.