Efficacy of chemotherapy after progression during or following PARPi exposure in ovarian cancer.

BRCA PARPi advanced ovarian cancer platinum-based chemotherapy

Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 05 05 2024
revised: 30 07 2024
accepted: 31 07 2024
medline: 5 9 2024
pubmed: 5 9 2024
entrez: 4 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) improved advanced ovarian cancer treatment. Most patients progress during or following PARPi exposure, however, with concerns about sensitivity of subsequent chemotherapy. In this international cohort study, we evaluated the efficacy of a subsequent chemotherapy following PARPi exposure in high-grade ovarian carcinoma patients. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and a multivariable Cox model was built to identify factors influencing PFS. We included 291 patients from four international centers treated between January 2002 and December 2021. The median number of previous chemotherapy was 1 (1.0-7.0), the median duration of PARPi exposure was 6.5 months (0.2-54.3 months). PARPi was used in first line in 14.1% patients. Most progressions occurred under PARPi exposure (89.1%). A BRCA pathogenic variant was identified in 130 patients (44.7%), absent in 157 patients (54.0%), and undocumented in 4 patients (1.4%). Platinum-based CT (PBC) and non-PBC were administered as subsequent treatments in, respectively, 182 patients (62.5%) and 109 patients (37.5%). Multivariable analyses showed that platinum-free interval (PFI) >6 months [adjusted hazards ratio (HR), 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.70] and type of initial surgery (adjusted HR, 1.41; 95% CI 1.07-1.87; interval or closing surgery versus primary surgery) were associated with PFS, independent of BRCA status or line of therapy (≥2 versus 1). In patients with a PFI >6 months, PBC was numerically associated with the best PFS (adjusted HR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.46-1.01). This is the largest real-world study assessing the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy in patients progressing during PARPi exposure. The patients have poor outcomes. PBC is the best option in patients progressing on PARPi and eligible for PBC rechallenge (PFI >6 months).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) improved advanced ovarian cancer treatment. Most patients progress during or following PARPi exposure, however, with concerns about sensitivity of subsequent chemotherapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
In this international cohort study, we evaluated the efficacy of a subsequent chemotherapy following PARPi exposure in high-grade ovarian carcinoma patients. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and a multivariable Cox model was built to identify factors influencing PFS.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 291 patients from four international centers treated between January 2002 and December 2021. The median number of previous chemotherapy was 1 (1.0-7.0), the median duration of PARPi exposure was 6.5 months (0.2-54.3 months). PARPi was used in first line in 14.1% patients. Most progressions occurred under PARPi exposure (89.1%). A BRCA pathogenic variant was identified in 130 patients (44.7%), absent in 157 patients (54.0%), and undocumented in 4 patients (1.4%). Platinum-based CT (PBC) and non-PBC were administered as subsequent treatments in, respectively, 182 patients (62.5%) and 109 patients (37.5%). Multivariable analyses showed that platinum-free interval (PFI) >6 months [adjusted hazards ratio (HR), 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.70] and type of initial surgery (adjusted HR, 1.41; 95% CI 1.07-1.87; interval or closing surgery versus primary surgery) were associated with PFS, independent of BRCA status or line of therapy (≥2 versus 1). In patients with a PFI >6 months, PBC was numerically associated with the best PFS (adjusted HR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.46-1.01).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This is the largest real-world study assessing the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy in patients progressing during PARPi exposure. The patients have poor outcomes. PBC is the best option in patients progressing on PARPi and eligible for PBC rechallenge (PFI >6 months).

Identifiants

pubmed: 39232440
pii: S2059-7029(24)01463-7
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103694
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103694

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

A Xu-Vuillard (A)

Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Sorbonne Université, Paris.

C Guerin-Charbonnel (C)

Department of Biostatistics and Analytics, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Nantes.

F Bocquet (F)

Data Factory, Institut de Cancérologie de L'ouest, Nantes, France.

S Cheeseman (S)

Leeds Cancer Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

P M Kubelac (PM)

The Oncology Institute Prof. Dr Ion Chiricuta, Kluj-Napoca, Romania.

M Zenatri (M)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint-Herblain.

G Hall (G)

Leeds Cancer Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

P Achimas-Cadariu (P)

The Oncology Institute Prof. Dr Ion Chiricuta, Kluj-Napoca, Romania; Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint-Herblain; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Oncology Evidence Network, IQVIA, London, UK; City Hospital, Timisoara, Romania; Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Angers, France; University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Kluj-Napoca, Romania.

B Hanvic (B)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.

H Fenton (H)

Oncology Evidence Network, IQVIA, London, UK.

A-M-L Sturz-Lazăr (AM)

City Hospital, Timisoara, Romania.

P Augereau (P)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Angers, France.

I R Coquard (IR)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.

A Leary (A)

Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

J-S Frenel (JS)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint-Herblain. Electronic address: jean-sebastien.frenel@ico.unicancer.fr.

Classifications MeSH