Routine Use of Videolaryngoscopy in Airway Management.
Journal
International anesthesiology clinics
ISSN: 1537-1913
Titre abrégé: Int Anesthesiol Clin
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370760
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
5
9
2024
pubmed:
5
9
2024
entrez:
5
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tracheal intubation is a fundamental facet of airway management, for which the importance of achieving success at the first attempt is well recognized. Failure to do so can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if there is inadequate patient oxygenation by alternate means. The evidence supporting the benefits of a videolaryngoscope in attaining this objective is now overwhelming (in adults). This has led to its increasing recognition in international airway management guidelines and its promotion from an occasional airway rescue tool to the first-choice device during routine airway management. However, usage in clinical practice does not currently reflect the increased worldwide availability that followed the upsurge in videolaryngoscope purchasing during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There are a number of obstacles to widespread adoption, including lack of adequate training, fears over de-skilling at direct laryngoscopy, equipment and cleaning costs, and concerns over the environmental impact, among others. It is now clear that in order for patients to benefit maximally from the technology and for airway managers to fully appreciate its role in everyday practice, proper training and education are necessary. Recent research evidence has addressed some existing barriers to default usage, and the emergence of techniques such as awake videolaryngoscopy and video-assisted flexible (bronchoscopic) intubation has also increased the scope of clinical application. Future studies will likely further confirm the superiority of videolaryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy, therefore, it is incumbent upon all airway managers (and their teams) to gain expertise in videolaryngoscopy and to use it routinely in their everyday practice..
Identifiants
pubmed: 39233571
doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000450
pii: 00004311-202406240-00006
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
48-58Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Macintosh RR. A new laryngoscope. Lancet. 1943;241:205.
Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. The NAP4 Report: Major Complications of Airway Management in the UK. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists. Accessed March 30, 2011. http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/index.asp?PageID=1089
Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, et al. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:429–437.
Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists' prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia. 2014;70:244–249.
Sajayan A, Nair A, McNarry AF, et al. Analysis of a national difficult airway database. Anaesthesia. 2022;77:1081–1088.
Kheterpal S, Martin L, Shanks AM, et al. Prediction and outcomes of impossible mask ventilation: a review of 50,000 anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:891–897.
Reinhard M, Eberhardt E. Alfred Kirstein (1863-1922)-pioneer in direct laryngoscopy. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1995;30:240–246.
Coleman ML, Jacob AK, Kopp SL, et al. The history of anesthesia Cullen BF, Stock CM, Ortega R, Sharar SR, Holt NF, Conor CW, Nathan N , eds. Barash, Cullen, and Stoelting’s Clinical Anesthesia, 9th edn. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2024:1–24.
Bannister FB, Macbeth RG. Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Lancet. 1944;244:651–654.
Berkow LC, Morey TE, Urdaneta F. The technology of video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1527–1534.
Cooper RM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:611–613.
Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, et al. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:191–198.
Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ, et al. Changes in airway configuration with different head and neck positions using magnetic resonance imaging of normal airways: a new concept with possible clinical applications. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:683–690.
Koyama JI, Aoyama T, Kusano Y, et al. Description and first clinical application of AirWay Scope for tracheal intubation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006;18:247–250.
Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, et al. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:469–477.
Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, et al. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:671–677.
Teoh WHL, Saxena S, Shah MK, et al. Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC, Glidescope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1126–1132.
Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, et al. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: First experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:473–477.
Wallace CD, Foulds LT, McLeod GA, et al. A comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC laryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:1281–1285.
Wai AKC, Graham CA. Effects of an elevated position on time to tracheal intubation by novice intubators using Macintosh laryngoscopy or videolaryngoscopy: randomized crossover trial. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015;2:174–178.
Rai MR, Dering A, Verghese C. The Glidescope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:60–64.
Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Case series: The McGrath videolaryngoscope—an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:307–313.
Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129:612–623.
Ray DC, Billington C, Kearns PK, et al. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:1207–1210.
Rabiner JE, Auerbach M, Avner JR, et al. Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians. Emerg Med Int. 2013;2013:407547.
Tan BH, Liu EHC, Lim RTC, et al. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Airway Scope by novice operators in simulated easy and difficult airways–a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:187–190.
Malik MA, Hassett P, Carney J, et al. A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:802–811.
Hirabayashi Y, Otsuka Y, Seo N. GlideScope videolaryngoscope reduces the incidence of erroneous esophageal intubation by novice laryngoscopists. J Anesth. 2010;24:303–305.
Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K, Bhagrath R, et al. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in adults. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:509–528.
Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, et al. Video versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation of critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:418–429.
Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, et al. Intubation practices and adverse peri-intubation events in critically ill patients from 29 countries. JAMA. 2021;325:1164–1172.
Russotto V, Lascarrou JB, Tassistro E, et al. Efficacy and adverse events profile of videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients: subanalysis of the INTUBE study. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131:607–616.
Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:369–383.
Chrimes N, Higgs A, Hagberg CA, et al. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies. Anaesthesia. 2022;77:1321–1325.
Cortellazzi P, Caldiroli D, Byrne A, et al. Defining and developing expertise in tracheal intubation using a GlideScope for anaesthetists with expertise in Macintosh direct laryngoscopy: an in-vivo longitudinal study. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:290–295.
Hickman J, McNarry AF, Kelly FE. Practical strategies for delivering airway training in the COVID-19 era. Br J Anaesth. 2021;127:188–191.
Hogan NJ, McNarry AF. Human factors in anaesthesia for oral cancer surgery: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Anesth. 2023;2:5–5.
Cook TM, Boniface NJ, Seller C, et al. Universal videolaryngoscopy: a structured approach to conversion to videolaryngoscopy for all intubations in an anaesthetic and intensive care department. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:173–180.
Jones L, Mulcahy K, Fox J, et al. C-MAC videolaryngoscopy: the anaesthetic assistant’s view. J Perioper Pract. 2018;28:83–89.
Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, et al. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:34–41.
Cook TM, El-Boghdadly K, McGuire B, et al. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:785–799.
Patwa A, Shah A, Garg R, et al. All India Difficult Airway Association (AIDAA) consensus guidelines for airway management in the operating room during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:S107–S115.
Ti LK, Ang LS, Foong TW, et al. What we do when a COVID-19 patient needs an operation: operating room preparation and guidance. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:756–758.
Wax RS, Christian MD. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:568–576.
Brewster DJ, Chrimes N, Do TB, et al. Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group. Med J Aust. 2020;212:472–481.
Chen X, Liu Y, Gong Y, et al. Perioperative management of patients infected with the novel coronavirus: recommendation from the joint task force of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology and the Chinese Association of Anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:1307–1316.
El-Boghdadly K, Wong DJN, Owen R, et al. Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: a prospective international multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1437–1447.
Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, et al. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35797.
Brown J, Gregson FKA, Shrimpton A, et al. A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during tracheal intubation and extubation. Anaesthesia. 2020;76:174–181.
Hall D, Steel A, Heij R, et al. Videolaryngoscopy increases ‘mouth-to-mouth’ distance compared with direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:822–823.
Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:827–848.
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251–270.
Ramkumar V, Dinesh E, Shetty SR, et al. All India Difficult Airway Association 2016 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:899–905.
Piepho T, Cavus E, Noppens R, et al. S1 guidelines on airway management: guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Anaesthesist. 2015;64(suppl 1):27–40.
Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. JSA airway management guideline 2014: to improve the safety of induction of anesthesia. J Anesth. 2014;28:482–493.
Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management - Part 1 - Intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:1089–1118.
Higgs A, McGrath BA, Goddard C, et al. Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:323–352.
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2022;136:31–81.
Law JA, Duggan LV, Asselin M, et al. Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68:1373–1404.
Wylie NW, Durrant EL, Phillips EC, et al. Videolaryngoscopy use before and after the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: the report of the VL-iCUE survey with responses from 96 countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024;41:296–304.
Savoldelli GL, Schiffer E, Abegg C, et al. Learning curves of the Glidescope, the McGrath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:554–558.
Paolini JB, Donati F, Drolet P. Review article: video-laryngoscopy: another tool for difficult intubation or a new paradigm in airway management? Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:184–191.
Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:23–27.
Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2022;4:CD011136.
De Jong A, Sfara T, Pouzeratte Y, et al. Videolaryngoscopy as a first-intention technique for tracheal intubation in unselected surgical patients: a before and after observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129:624–634.
Kriege M, Noppens RR, Turkstra T, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of the McGrathTM Mac videolaryngoscope versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2023;78:722–729.
Cafferkey J, Ward PA. Intubation aids in hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy: essential components more than just adjuncts. Anaesthesia. 2024;79:659–660.
Eum D, Ji YJ, Kim HJ. Comparison of the success rate of tracheal intubation between stylet and bougie with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2024;79:603–610.
Meitzen SE, Benumof JL. Video laryngoscopy: positives, negatives, and defining the difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2019;128:399–401.
Critchley JD, Ferguson C, Kidd E, et al. Simple steps towards improving safety in obstetric airway management: a quality improvement project. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023;40:826–832.
Roth D, Pace NL, Lee A, et al. Bedside tests for predicting difficult airways: an abridged Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:915–928.
Heidegger T. Management of the difficult airway. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1836–1847.
Sturrock JC, Ward PA. Videolaryngoscopy: less ‘looking round the corner’...more seeing what is in plain view. Anaesthesia. 2022;77:1455.
Cook TM. Evidence, default videolaryngoscopy and which mode of laryngoscopy would your patient choose? Anaesthesia. 2023;78:791–792.
Wylie NW, Phillips EC, Harrington JK, et al. Videolaryngoscopy utilisation: facts and opinions. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2019;29:21–25.
Aseri S, Ahmad H, Vallance H. Video laryngoscopy improves endotracheal intubation training for novices. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:133.
Low D, Healy D, Rasburn N. The use of the BERCI DCI Video Laryngoscope for teaching novices direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:195–201.
Herbstreit F, Fassbender P, Haberl H, et al. Learning endotracheal intubation using a novel videolaryngoscope improves intubation skills of medical students. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:586–590.
Kaplan MB, Ward DS, Berci G. A new video laryngoscope – an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:620–626.
Howard-Quijano KJ, Huang YM, Matevosian R, et al. Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:568–572.
Kelly FE, Cook TM. Seeing is believing: getting the best out of videolaryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:i9–i13.
Gill RL, Jeffrey ASY, McNarry AF, et al. The availability of advanced airway equipment and experience with videolaryngoscopy in the UK: two UK surveys. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:152014.
Cook TM, Kelly FE. A national survey of videolaryngoscopy in the United Kingdom. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:593–600.
Armstrong L, Harding F, Critchley J, et al. An international survey of airway management education in 61 countries. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e54–e60.
Nagy B, Rendeki S. A national survey of videolaryngoscopes and alternative intubation devices in Hungary. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0223645.
Young MJ. Anaesthesia providers’ accessibility and use of video laryngoscopes in operating theatres in South Africa. Capetown: University of Capetown; 2023.
De Jong A, Molinari N, Conseil M, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:629–639.
Arulkumaran N, Lowe J, Ions R, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:712–724.
Pass M, Di Rollo N, McNarry AF. Videolaryngoscopy in critical care and emergency locations: moving from debating benefit to implementation. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131:434–438.
Tsan SEH, Lim SM, Abidin MFZ, et al. Comparison of Macintosh laryngoscopy in bed-up-head-elevated position with glidescope laryngoscopy: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Anesth Analg. 2020;131:210–219.
Alain TI, Drissa BS, Flavien K, et al. Video-laryngoscopy introduction in a sub-Saharan national teaching hospital: luxury or necessity? Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22:381; 1937-8688.
Shruthi AH, Dinakara D, Chandrika YR. Role of videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult airway in adults: a survey. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:855–862.
Frija G, Blažić I, Frush DP, et al. How to improve access to medical imaging in low- and middle-income countries. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;38:101034.
Gorman L, Dickson AN, Monaghan M, et al. Novel co-axial, disposable, low-cost 3D printed videolaryngoscopes for patients with COVID-19: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2023;2:e0015.
Saitch H, Scholz A, Brennan F. How sustainable are your laryngoscopes? Anaesthesia News. 2023;427:4–7.
McGain F, Story D, Lim T, et al. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:862–869.
Alhomary M, Ramadan E, Curran E, et al. Videolaryngoscopy vs. fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:1151–1161.
Jones PM, Harle CC. Avoiding awake intubation by performing awake GlideScope laryngoscopy in the preoperative holding area. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:1264–1265.
Saul SA, Ward PA, McNarry AF. Airway management: the current role of videolaryngoscopy. J Pers Med. 2023;13:1327.
Khan MF, Shamim F, Slote MU, et al. Combined use of a videolaryngoscope and a flexible bronchoscope for awake tracheal intubation when front-of-neck airway is not an option. Anaesth Rep. 2021;9:12–15.
Kim SM, Kim HJ. Successful advancement of endotracheal tube with combined fiberoptic bronchoscopy and videolaryngoscopy in a patient with a huge goiter. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2020;8:2050313X2092323.
Cockroft M, Simmonds L, Saunders T, et al. Optimising videolaryngoscope use: a video-assisted flexible-optical intubation and CMAC D blade multidisciplinary training programme. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e201–e202.
Ruetzler K, Bustamante S, Schmidt MT, et al. Video laryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the operating room: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331:1279–1286.
Phelan HM, Stobbs SL, Sorbello M, et al. A prospective cohort evaluation of the McGrath™ MAC videolaryngoscope in a series of 979 cases. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2023;48:101209.
Smith C, McNarry AF. Airway leads and airway response teams: improving delivery of safer airway management. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2020;10:370–377.
Berkow LC, McNarry AF. Hospital and Departmental Organisation Cook TM, Kristensen MS. Core Topcis in Airway Management, 3rd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2020.
McNarry AF M, Cook T, Baker PA, et al. The Airway Lead: opportunities to improve institutional and personal preparedness for airway management. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e22–e24.
Baker PA, Behringer EC, Feinleib J, et al. Formation of an Airway Lead Network: an essential patient safety initiative. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128:225–229.
Royal College of Anaesthetists. Curriculum for a CCT in Anaesthetics 2021. Accessed 5 April 2024. https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/documents/2021-curriculum-cct-anaesthetics/introduction.
Schoettker P, Potié A, Dzyuba A, et al. Virtual reality simulation to teach videolaryngoscopy: a preliminary validation study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e209–e210.
El-Boghdadly K, Onwochei DN, Millhoff B, et al. The effect of virtual endoscopy on diagnostic accuracy and airway management strategies in patients with head and neck pathology: a prospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64:1101–1110.
Zaouter C, Calderon J, Hemmerling TM. Videolaryngoscopy as a new standard of care. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:181–183.
Cook TM, Aziz MF. Has the time really come for universal videolaryngoscopy? Br J Anaesth. 2022;129:474–477.
Baigey A, Ward PA. Videolaryngoscopy terminology: promoting universal understanding. Trends in Anaesth Crit Care. 2024;55:101342.
Chaggar RS, Shah SV, Berry M, et al. The Video Classification of Intubation (VCI) score: a new description tool for tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38:324–326.
Ward PA, McNarry AF. Maximising the benefit of new technologies in airway management. Indian J Anaesth. 2024;68:412–414.