Spatio-temporal EEG dynamics during decision-making in online poker players with problem gambling.

Iowa Gambling Task decision-making high-density EEG problem gambling

Journal

Journal of behavioral addictions
ISSN: 2063-5303
Titre abrégé: J Behav Addict
Pays: Hungary
ID NLM: 101602037

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 14 02 2024
revised: 13 05 2024
revised: 10 07 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 5 9 2024
pubmed: 5 9 2024
entrez: 5 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Gambling activity evolves along a continuum from recreational to Gambling Disorder (GD) and a particular challenge is to identify whether there are some neurophysiological particularities already present in gamblers at an early stage. Our main goal was to determine whether, in the gamblers' population, neural responses generated during uncertain decisions were different depending on problematic gambling risk defined by the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI). We tested the following hypothesis, that the Problem Gambling group would show a different brain activity related to outcomes processing than people with low risk. For this purpose, we established a relatively homogeneous population of Online Poker Players divided into two groups according to the CPGI (Low Risk and Problem Gambling). By means of high-density EEG, we compared the spatio-temporal dynamics generated during the completion of the Iowa Gambling Task. One specific topographic map was observed between 150-175 ms after a negative outcome for both groups, whereas it was displayed in the win condition only for the Problem Gambling group. We found that the Global Field Power of this map was negatively correlated with participants' adherence to a strategy. Source localization identified Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Temporal regions as generators of this map. Reward hypersensitivity EEG responses identified in the early outcome process could constitute a potential biomarker of problematic gambling.

Sections du résumé

Background and aims UNASSIGNED
Gambling activity evolves along a continuum from recreational to Gambling Disorder (GD) and a particular challenge is to identify whether there are some neurophysiological particularities already present in gamblers at an early stage. Our main goal was to determine whether, in the gamblers' population, neural responses generated during uncertain decisions were different depending on problematic gambling risk defined by the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI). We tested the following hypothesis, that the Problem Gambling group would show a different brain activity related to outcomes processing than people with low risk.
Methods UNASSIGNED
For this purpose, we established a relatively homogeneous population of Online Poker Players divided into two groups according to the CPGI (Low Risk and Problem Gambling). By means of high-density EEG, we compared the spatio-temporal dynamics generated during the completion of the Iowa Gambling Task.
Results UNASSIGNED
One specific topographic map was observed between 150-175 ms after a negative outcome for both groups, whereas it was displayed in the win condition only for the Problem Gambling group. We found that the Global Field Power of this map was negatively correlated with participants' adherence to a strategy. Source localization identified Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Temporal regions as generators of this map.
Discussion and conclusions UNASSIGNED
Reward hypersensitivity EEG responses identified in the early outcome process could constitute a potential biomarker of problematic gambling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39235871
doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00048
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Julie Giustiniani (J)

1Université de Franche Comté, UMR INSERM 1322 LINC, F-25000, Besançon, France.
2Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, département clinique de psychiatrie, 25000, Besançon, France.
3Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Inserm CIC 1431, 25000, Besançon, France.

Magali Nicolier (M)

1Université de Franche Comté, UMR INSERM 1322 LINC, F-25000, Besançon, France.
2Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, département clinique de psychiatrie, 25000, Besançon, France.
3Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Inserm CIC 1431, 25000, Besançon, France.
4Université de Franche Comté, Neuraxess département de neuroimagerie et neurostimulation, 25000, Besançon, France.

Florine Maylié (F)

1Université de Franche Comté, UMR INSERM 1322 LINC, F-25000, Besançon, France.
3Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Inserm CIC 1431, 25000, Besançon, France.
4Université de Franche Comté, Neuraxess département de neuroimagerie et neurostimulation, 25000, Besançon, France.

Lionel Pazart (L)

1Université de Franche Comté, UMR INSERM 1322 LINC, F-25000, Besançon, France.
3Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Inserm CIC 1431, 25000, Besançon, France.
4Université de Franche Comté, Neuraxess département de neuroimagerie et neurostimulation, 25000, Besançon, France.

Emmanuel Haffen (E)

1Université de Franche Comté, UMR INSERM 1322 LINC, F-25000, Besançon, France.
2Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, département clinique de psychiatrie, 25000, Besançon, France.
3Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Inserm CIC 1431, 25000, Besançon, France.
4Université de Franche Comté, Neuraxess département de neuroimagerie et neurostimulation, 25000, Besançon, France.
5Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France.

Damien Gabriel (D)

1Université de Franche Comté, UMR INSERM 1322 LINC, F-25000, Besançon, France.
3Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Inserm CIC 1431, 25000, Besançon, France.
4Université de Franche Comté, Neuraxess département de neuroimagerie et neurostimulation, 25000, Besançon, France.

Classifications MeSH