Post Pulmonary Embolism Phenotypes Described by Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.
CTEPH
Dyspnea
Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Vascular Disease
iCPET
Journal
Chest
ISSN: 1931-3543
Titre abrégé: Chest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0231335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Sep 2024
03 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
04
02
2024
revised:
30
07
2024
accepted:
09
08
2024
medline:
6
9
2024
pubmed:
6
9
2024
entrez:
5
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Post pulmonary embolism (PE) dyspnea is common. Existing non-invasive studies have demonstrated that post PE dyspnea is associated with elevations in right ventricular afterload, dead space ventilation, and deconditioning. We aimed to use invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) parameters in patients with post PE dyspnea to identify unique physiologic phenotypes. Are there distinct post pulmonary embolism dyspnea physiologic phenotypes described with iCPET? Patients were enrolled at the time of acute PE and through our pulmonary hypertension and dyspnea clinic. ICPET was performed if there was high suspicion for pulmonary hypertension or if there was unexplained dyspnea. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify dyspnea phenotypes. ICPET parameters assessing pulmonary hemodynamics, ventilation, and peripheral oxygen utilization were then compared within and across each cluster and with iCPET controls against peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2). 173 patients were enrolled. Sixty-seven patients underwent iCPET. All patients had reductions in Peak VO2 and peak cardiac index relative to controls. Three clusters were identified. Cluster one was defined by having elevated RV afterload and impaired ventilatory efficiency. Cluster two had elevated RV afterload with reductions in respiratory mechanics. Cluster three had mild derangement in RV afterload with mild reductions in peak cardiac output. iCPET reveals significant heterogeneity in post PE dyspnea. Three phenotypes are characterized by differences in RV afterload, ventilatory efficiency, respiratory mechanics, and peripheral oxygen utilization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Post pulmonary embolism (PE) dyspnea is common. Existing non-invasive studies have demonstrated that post PE dyspnea is associated with elevations in right ventricular afterload, dead space ventilation, and deconditioning. We aimed to use invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) parameters in patients with post PE dyspnea to identify unique physiologic phenotypes.
RESEARCH QUESTION
OBJECTIVE
Are there distinct post pulmonary embolism dyspnea physiologic phenotypes described with iCPET?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
METHODS
Patients were enrolled at the time of acute PE and through our pulmonary hypertension and dyspnea clinic. ICPET was performed if there was high suspicion for pulmonary hypertension or if there was unexplained dyspnea. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify dyspnea phenotypes. ICPET parameters assessing pulmonary hemodynamics, ventilation, and peripheral oxygen utilization were then compared within and across each cluster and with iCPET controls against peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2).
RESULTS
RESULTS
173 patients were enrolled. Sixty-seven patients underwent iCPET. All patients had reductions in Peak VO2 and peak cardiac index relative to controls. Three clusters were identified. Cluster one was defined by having elevated RV afterload and impaired ventilatory efficiency. Cluster two had elevated RV afterload with reductions in respiratory mechanics. Cluster three had mild derangement in RV afterload with mild reductions in peak cardiac output.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
iCPET reveals significant heterogeneity in post PE dyspnea. Three phenotypes are characterized by differences in RV afterload, ventilatory efficiency, respiratory mechanics, and peripheral oxygen utilization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39236998
pii: S0012-3692(24)05134-1
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.040
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.