Prognosis prediction and immunotherapy optimisation for cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepticus.

BACKGROUND

Cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepticus (cNORSE) currently lacks comprehensive knowledge regarding its clinical dynamics, prognostic factors and treatment guidance. Here we present the longitudinal clinical profiles, predictive factors for outcomes and the optimal duration of immunotherapy in patients with cNORSE.

METHODS

This retrospective secondary endpoint analysis investigated patients with cNORSE identified from a prospective autoimmune encephalitis cohort at a national referral centre in Korea. The main outcomes included longitudinal functional scales, seizure frequency and the number of antiseizure medications. Measures encompassed NORSE-related clinical parameters such as the duration of unconsciousness, immunotherapy profiles, cytokine/chemokine analysis, and serial MRI scans.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients with cNORSE were finally analysed (mean age: 38.0±18.2; 36 (48.6%) male). All patients received first-line immunotherapy, and 91.9% (68/74) received second-line immunotherapy. A total of 83.8% (62/74) regained consciousness within a median duration of 30 days (14-56), and 50% (31/62) achieved good outcome (mRS ≤2) at 2 years. Poor 1-year outcomes (mRS ≥3) were predicted by the presence of mesial temporal lobe (mTL) and extra-mTL lesions at 3-month MRI, and prolonged unconsciousness (≥60 days). Those with mTL atrophy exhibited a higher seizure burden post-NORSE. The optimal duration of immunotherapy appeared to be between 18 weeks and 1-year post-NORSE onset.

CONCLUSIONS

This study elucidates longitudinal clinical dynamics, functional outcomes, prognostic factors and immunotherapy response in patients with cNORSE. These findings might contribute to a more standardised understanding and clinical decision-making for cNORSE.

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: Dr S-TL reports personal fees from Roche/Genentech (steering committee) and Advanced Neural Technologies (advisory board), and grants from GC Pharma and Celltrion, outside the submitted work. Dr DD reports consultant fees (paid to institution) from UCB, Immunovant, Argenx, Arialys and Astellas Pharmaceuticals. Dr DD has patents pending for LUZP4-IgG, cavin-4-IgG and SKOR2 IgG as markers of neurological autoimmunity, and patents licensed for KLHL11 IgG.