Singlet oxygen detection in vivo is hindered by nonspecific SOSG staining.
Candida albicans
Fluorescent staining
Photodynamic treatment
Photosensitizer
Singlet oxygen
Singlet oxygen sensor green
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Sep 2024
05 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
13
06
2024
accepted:
30
08
2024
medline:
6
9
2024
pubmed:
6
9
2024
entrez:
5
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Singlet oxygen is considered an important cell damaging agent due to its propensity to react with organic compounds. This drives the interest in developing methods for determination of
Identifiants
pubmed: 39237763
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71801-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-71801-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Singlet Oxygen
17778-80-2
Fluorescent Dyes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20669Subventions
Organisme : Kuwait University
ID : YM05/22
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Klotz, L. O., Kroncke, K. D. & Sies, H. Singlet oxygen-induced signaling effects in mammalian cells. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1039/b210750c (2003).
doi: 10.1039/b210750c
pubmed: 12664966
Flors, C. et al. Imaging the production of singlet oxygen in vivo using a new fluorescent sensor, Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green®. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1725–1734. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj181 (2006).
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj181
pubmed: 16595576
Kim, S., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. Photochemistry of singlet oxygen sensor green. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 13985–13992 (2013).
doi: 10.1021/jp406638g
pubmed: 24111566
Shen, Y. et al. Kinetic analysis of singlet oxygen generation in a living cell using Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green. Prog. Biomed. Opt. Imaging Proc. SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.870261 (2010).
doi: 10.1117/12.870261
Shen, Y. et al. Indirect imaging of singlet oxygen generation from a single cell. Laser Phys. Lett. 8, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/lapl.201010113 (2011).
doi: 10.1002/lapl.201010113
Osakada, Y. et al. Generation of singlet oxygen during photosensitized one-electron oxidation of DNA. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 1060–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201101964 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/chem.201101964
pubmed: 22190351
Ragàs, X., Cooper, L. P., White, J. H., Nonell, S. & Flors, C. Quantification of photosensitized singlet oxygen production by a fluorescent protein. Chemphyschem Eur. J. Chem. Phys. Phys. Chem. 12, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000919 (2011).
doi: 10.1002/cphc.201000919
Prasad, A., Sedlářová, M. & Pospíšil, P. Singlet oxygen imaging using fluorescent probe Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green in photosynthetic organisms. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31638-5 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31638-5
pubmed: 30523273
pmcid: 6283845
Gollmer, A. et al. Singlet oxygen sensor green®: Photochemical behavior in solution and in a mammalian cell. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00900.x (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00900.x
pubmed: 21272007
Prasad, A., Ferretti, U., Sedlaová, M. & Pospíšil, P. Singlet oxygen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under heat stress. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20094 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/srep20094
pubmed: 28000730
pmcid: 5175139
Hideg, É. A comparative study of fluorescent singlet oxygen probes in plant leaves. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 3, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-008-0018-5 (2008).
doi: 10.2478/s11535-008-0018-5
Li, E. et al. The abnormal physicochemical phenomena of singlet oxygen sensor green in water in the presence of ultrasound. ChemistrySelect 6, 6631–6635. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202101436 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/slct.202101436
Liu, H., Carter, P. J. H., Laan, A. C., Eelkema, R. & Denkova, A. G. Singlet oxygen sensor green is not a suitable probe for
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44880-2
pubmed: 31892729
pmcid: 6938519
Poderys, V., Jarockyte, G., Bagdonas, S., Karabanovas, V. & Rotomskis, R. Protein-stabilized gold nanoclusters for PDT: ROS and singlet oxygen generation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111802 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111802
pubmed: 31981990
Sharma, B. et al. Biocompatible metallosurfactant-based nanocolloid-loaded Rose Bengal with excellent singlet oxygen-induced phototoxicity efficiency against cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 11, 4899–4913. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb02730e (2023).
doi: 10.1039/d2tb02730e
pubmed: 37191118
Sharma, S. K. & Hamblin, M. R. in Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 2202, pp 215–229 (2021).
Nguyen, T. L. et al. Singlet oxygen generation by sonication using a water-soluble fullerene (C60) complex: A potential application for sonodynamic therapy. Polym. J. 52, 1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0390-1 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41428-020-0390-1
McEwan, C. et al. Oxygen carrying microbubbles for enhanced sonodynamic therapy of hypoxic tumours. J. Control Release 203, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.004 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.004
pubmed: 25660073
Liu, H., Carter, P. J. H., Laan, A. C., Eelkema, R. & Denkova, A. G. Singlet oxygen sensor green is not a suitable probe for (1)O(2) in the presence of ionizing radiation. Sci. Rep. 9, 8393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44880-2 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44880-2
pubmed: 31182744
pmcid: 6557857
Ragàs, X., Jiménez-Banzo, A., Sánchez-García, D., Batllori, X. & Nonell, S. Singlet oxygen photosensitisation by the fluorescent probe Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green®. ChemComm. https://doi.org/10.1039/b822776d (2009).
doi: 10.1039/b822776d
Ebrahimi, A., Csonka, L. N. & Alam, M. A. Analyzing thermal stability of cell membrane of Salmonella using time-multiplexed impedance sensing. Biophys. J. 114, 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.032 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.032
pubmed: 29414707
pmcid: 5985002
Russell, A. D. Lethal effects of heat on bacterial physiology and structure. Sci. Prog. 86, 115–137. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685003783238699 (2003).
doi: 10.3184/003685003783238699
pubmed: 12838607
pmcid: 10368340
Lindivat, M., Bratbak, G., Larsen, A., Hess-Erga, O. K. & Hoell, I. A. Flow cytometric analysis of bacterial protein synthesis: Monitoring vitality after water treatment. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.772651 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.772651
pubmed: 34956134
pmcid: 8702973
Cheung, H. Y. et al. Differential actions of chlorhexidine on the cell wall of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Plos One 7, ARTN e36659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036659 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036659
Jones, C. G. Chlorhexidine: Is it still the gold standard?. Periodontology. 2000(15), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x (1997).
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x
Barrettbee, K., Newboult, L. & Edwards, S. The membrane destabilizing action of the antibacterial agent chlorhexidine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 119, 249–253 (1994).
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06896.x
pubmed: 8039666
Spector, A., Ma, W., Sun, F., Li, D. & Kleiman, N. J. The effect of H2O2 and tertiary butyl hydroperoxide upon a murine immortal lens epithelial cell line, αTN4-1. Exp. Eye Res. 75, 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.2002.2045 (2002).
doi: 10.1006/exer.2002.2045
pubmed: 12457869
Gupta, A. & Imlay, J. A. Escherichia coli induces DNA repair enzymes to protect itself from low-grade hydrogen peroxide stress. Mol. Microbiol. 117, 754–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14870 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/mmi.14870
pubmed: 34942039
pmcid: 9018492
Park, S., You, X. & Imlay, J. A. Substantial DNA damage from submicromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide detected in Hpx-mutants of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102, 9317–9322. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502051102 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502051102
pubmed: 15967999
pmcid: 1166606
Lin, H. et al. Feasibility Study on quantitative measurements of singlet oxygen generation using singlet oxygen sensor green. J. Fluoresc. 23, 41–47 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s10895-012-1114-5
pubmed: 22914972
Redmond, R. W. & Gamlin, J. N. A compilation of singlet oxygen yields from biologically relevant molecules. Photochem. Photobiol. 70, 391–475 (1999).
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb08240.x
pubmed: 10546544
Ezzeddine, R. et al. Effect of molecular characteristics on cellular uptake, subcellular localization, and phototoxicity of Zn(II) N-alkylpyridylporphyrins. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 36579–36588. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.511642 (2013).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.511642
pubmed: 24214973
pmcid: 3868770
Bottiroli, G. et al. Enzyme-assisted cell photosensitization: A proposal for an efficient approach to tumor therapy and diagnosis. The rose bengal fluorogenic substrate. Photochem. Photobiol. 66, 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03161.x (1997).
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03161.x
pubmed: 9297981
Morton, C. O., Chau, M. & Stack, C. In vitro combination therapy using low dose clotrimazole and photodynamic therapy leads to enhanced killing of the dermatophyte. BMC Microbiol. 14, ARTN 261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0261-z (2014).
doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0261-z
Abbas, G. et al. Effect of the nature of the chelated metal on the photodynamic activity of metalloporphyrins. Free Radic. Res. 57, 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715762.2023.2288997 (2023).
doi: 10.1080/10715762.2023.2288997
pubmed: 38035627
Bancirova, M. Sodium azide as a specific quencher of singlet oxygen during chemiluminescent detection by luminol and Cypridina luciferin analogues. Luminescence 26, 685–688. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.1296 (2011).
doi: 10.1002/bio.1296
pubmed: 21491580
Li, M. Y. et al. Quenching of singlet molecular oxygen (1O2) by azide anion in solvent mixtures. Photochem. Photobiol. 74, 760–764. https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074%3c0760:QOSMOO%3e2.0.CO;2 (2001).
doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074<0760:QOSMOO>2.0.CO;2
pubmed: 11783930
Dallas, P., Velasco, P. Q., Lebedeva, M. & Porfyrakis, K. Detecting the photosensitization from fullerenes and their dyads with gold nanoparticles with singlet oxygen sensor green. Chem. Phys. Lett. 730, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.05.055 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.05.055
Chen, T. & Fluhr, R. Singlet oxygen plays an essential role in the root’s response to osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 177, 1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00634 (2018).
doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00634
pubmed: 29954869
pmcid: 6084678
Mor, A. et al. Singlet oxygen signatures are detected independent of light or chloroplasts in response to multiple stresses. Plant Physiol. 165, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.236380 (2014).
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.236380
pubmed: 24599491
pmcid: 4012584
Thomas, M., Craik, J. D., Tovmasyan, A., Batinic-Haberle, I. & Benov, L. T. Amphiphilic cationic Zn-porphyrins with high photodynamic antimicrobial activity. Future Microbiol. 10, 709–724. https://doi.org/10.2217/Fmb.14.148 (2015).
doi: 10.2217/Fmb.14.148
pubmed: 26000647
Ruiz-González, R. et al. NanoSOSG: A nanostructured fluorescent probe for the detection of intracellular singlet oxygen. Angewandte Chemie Int. Edn. 56, 2885–2888. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201609050 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/anie.201609050
Udo, E. E., Jacob, L. E. & Mathew, B. A cadmium resistance plasmid, pXU5, in Staphylococcus aureus, strain ATCC25923. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 189, 79–80 (2000).
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09209.x
pubmed: 10913869
Al Saleh, S., Al Mulla, F. & Luqmani, Y. A. Estrogen receptor silencing induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 6, e20610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020610 (2011).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020610
pubmed: 21713035
pmcid: 3119661
Alenezi, K., Tovmasyan, A., Batinic-Haberle, I. & Benov, L. T. Optimizing Zn porphyrin-based photosensitizers for efficient antibacterial photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 17, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.11.009 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.11.009
pubmed: 27888164
Awad, M. M., Tovmasyan, A., Craik, J. D., Batinic-Haberle, I. & Benov, L. T. Important cellular targets for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 7679–7688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7632-3 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7632-3
pubmed: 27221289