A protocol for stakeholder engagement in head and neck cancer pragmatic trials.
Deglutition disorders
Head and neck neoplasms
Patient participation
Pragmatic clinical trial
Speech-language pathology
Stakeholder participation
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Sep 2024
05 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
15
12
2023
accepted:
30
07
2024
medline:
6
9
2024
pubmed:
6
9
2024
entrez:
5
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Meaningful engagement with stakeholders in research demands intentional approaches. This paper describes the development of a framework to guide stakeholder engagement as research partners in a pragmatic trial proposed to evaluate behavioral interventions for dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients. We highlight the core principles of stakeholder engagement including representation of all perspectives, meaningful participation, respectful partnership with stakeholders, and accountability to stakeholders; and describe how these principles were operationalized to engage relevant stakeholders throughout the course of a large clinical trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39237888
doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12733-5
pii: 10.1186/s12885-024-12733-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1109Subventions
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : PCS-1609-36195
Pays : United States
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : PCS-1609-36195
Pays : United States
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : PCS-1609-36195
Pays : United States
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : PCS-1609-36195
Pays : United States
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : PCS-1609-36195
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Ruco A, Nichol K. Patient Engagement in Research and Innovation: a New Framework. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2016;47(4):290–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.10.008
pubmed: 31047251
Harrison J, Frampton S. Patient and Family Engagement in Research in Era 3. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(12 Pt B):1622–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.009
pubmed: 27888951
Kendall C, Fitzgerald M, Kang RS, Wong ST, Katz A, Fortin M, et al. Still learning and evolving in our approaches: patient and stakeholder engagement among Canadian community-based primary health care researchers. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:47.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0132-0
pubmed: 30524753
pmcid: 6276251
Bird M, Ouellette C, Whitmore C, Li L, Nair K, McGillion MH, et al. Preparing for patient partnership: a scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research. Health Expect. 2020;23(3):523–39.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13040
pubmed: 32157777
pmcid: 7321722
Frisch N, Atherton P, Doyle-Waters MM, MacLeod MLP, Mallidou A, Sheane V, et al. Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:4.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0
pubmed: 32055415
pmcid: 7011284
Hamilton CB, Hoens AM, Backman CL, McKinnon AM, McQuitty S, English K, et al. An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research. Health Expect. 2018;21(1):396–406.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12635
pubmed: 28984405
Research CIoH. Strategy for patient-oriented research: Patient engagement framework. 2014. pp. 1–11.
Frank L, Morton SC, Guise JM, Jull J, Concannon TW, Tugwell P. Engaging patients and other non-researchers in Health Research: defining Research Engagement. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(1):307–14.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05436-2
pubmed: 31713031
Rahman A, Nawaz S, Khan E, Islam S. Nothing about us, without us: is for us. Res Involv Engagem. 2022;8(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00372-8
pubmed: 35927767
pmcid: 9351243
Paul T. Nothing about us without us: toward patient- and family-centered care. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(1):3–5.
doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.18.1.fred1-1601
pubmed: 27276717
Bird M, McGillion M, Chambers EM, Dix J, Fajardo CJ, Gilmour M, et al. A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework. Res Involv Engagem. 2021;7(1):12.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7
pubmed: 33648588
pmcid: 7923456
Institute TB. The Beryl Institute - Improving the Patient Experience https://www.theberylinstitute.org/
Harrison JD, Anderson WG, Fagan M, Robinson E, Schnipper J, Symczak G, et al. Patient and Family Advisory councils (PFACs): identifying challenges and solutions to Support Engagement in Research. Patient. 2018;11(4):413–23.
doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0298-4
pubmed: 29392529
pmcid: 11034744
Duffett L. Patient engagement: what partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res. 2017;150:113–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.029
pubmed: 27817863
Crockett LK, Shimmin C, Wittmeier KDM, Sibley KM. Engaging patients and the public in Health Research: experiences, perceptions and training needs among Manitoba health researchers. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5:28.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0162-2
pubmed: 31608160
pmcid: 6781300
Harrison JD, Anderson WG, Fagan M, Robinson E, Schnipper J, Symczak G, et al. Patient and Family Advisory Councils for Research: recruiting and supporting members from diverse and hard-to-Reach communities. J Nurs Adm. 2019;49(10):473–9.
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000790
pubmed: 31490796
pmcid: 10985779
Frosch DL. From the Editor’s Desk: the Evolving Journey of Engaging Patients as Research Partners. J Gen Intern Med. 37. United States2022. pp. 1–2.
Heckert A, Forsythe LP, Carman KL, Frank L, Hemphill R, Elstad EA, et al. Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders’ perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:60.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00227-0
pubmed: 33042576
pmcid: 7539495
P AS. Patient engagement in cancer research from the patient’s perspective. Future Oncol. 2021;17(28):3717–28.
doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1198
Sanders Thompson VL, Ackermann N, Bauer KL, Bowen DJ, Goodman MS. Strategies of community engagement in research: definitions and classifications. Transl Behav Med. 2021;11(2):441–51.
doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa042
pubmed: 32421173
Pearce C. The complexities of developing equal relationships in patient and public involvement in health research. Social Theory Health. 2021;19(4):362–79.
doi: 10.1057/s41285-020-00142-0
Vat LE, Ryan D, Etchegary H. Recruiting patients as partners in health research: a qualitative descriptive study. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:15.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0067-x
pubmed: 29062540
pmcid: 5611573
Hedges J, Garvey G, Dodd Z, Miller W, Dunbar T, Leane C, et al. Engaging with indigenous Australian communities for a human papilloma virus and oropharyngeal cancer project; use of the CONSIDER statement. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):92.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00981-5
pubmed: 32334519
pmcid: 7183689
Martino R, Fitch MI, Fuller CD, Hope A, Krisciunas G, Langmore SE, et al. The PRO-ACTIVE trial protocol: a randomized study comparing the effectiveness of PROphylACTic swallow InterVEntion for patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1100.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08826-0
pubmed: 34645411
pmcid: 8513207
INVOLVE N. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. UK: INVOLVE Eastleigh; 2012.
(PCORI) P-CORI. Engagement Resources 2022 https://www.pcori.org/engagement/engagement-resources
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Financial compensation of patients, caregivers, and patient/caregiver organizations engaged in PCORI-funded research as engaged research patients 2015 http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-Compensation-Framework-for-Engaged-Research-Partners.pdf
Kirwan JR, de Wit M, Frank L, Haywood KL, Salek S, Brace-McDonnell S, et al. Emerging guidelines for Patient Engagement in Research. Value Health. 2017;20(3):481–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003
pubmed: 28292494
Partridge N, Scadding J. The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. Lancet. 2004;364(9449):1923–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17494-1
pubmed: 15566996
Martino R, Beaton D, Diamant NE. Using different perspectives to generate items for a new scale measuring medical outcomes of dysphagia (MOD). J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):518–26.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.007
pubmed: 18722085
List MA, Mumby P, Haraf D, Siston A, Mick R, MacCracken E, et al. Performance and quality of life outcome in patients completing concomitant chemoradiotherapy protocols for head and neck cancer. Qual Life Res. 1997;6(3):274–84.
doi: 10.1023/A:1026419023481
pubmed: 9226985
Owadally W, Hurt C, Timmins H, Parsons E, Townsend S, Patterson J, et al. PATHOS: a phase II/III trial of risk-stratified, reduced intensity adjuvant treatment in patients undergoing transoral surgery for human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:602.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1598-x
pubmed: 26311526
pmcid: 4549836
Martino R, Beaton D, Diamant NE. Perceptions of psychological issues related to dysphagia differ in acute and chronic patients. Dysphagia. 2010;25(1):26–34.
doi: 10.1007/s00455-009-9225-0
pubmed: 19657695
Paleri V, Patterson J. Use of gastrostomy in head and neck cancer: a systematic review to identify areas for future research. Clinical otolaryngology: official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Cervico-Facial Surg. 2010;35(3):177–89.
van der Laan HP, Bijl HP, Steenbakkers RJ, van der Schaaf A, Chouvalova O, Vemer-van den Hoek JG, et al. Acute symptoms during the course of head and neck radiotherapy or chemoradiation are strong predictors of late dysphagia. Radiotherapy Oncology: J Eur Soc Therapeutic Radiol Oncol. 2015;115(1):56–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.01.019
Kruger R, Casey M. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed2015.
Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a Tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to Validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–11.
doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870
pubmed: 27340178
Boden C, Edmonds AM, Porter T, Bath B, Dunn K, Gerrard A, et al. Patient partners’ perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews: a patient-oriented rapid review. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1056–71.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13279
pubmed: 34048618
pmcid: 8369105
Donovan M, Glackin M. The lived experience of patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a literature review. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2012;18(9):448–55.
doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.9.448
pubmed: 23124055
Nund RL, Ward EC, Scarinci NA, Cartmill B, Kuipers P, Porceddu SV. The lived experience of dysphagia following non-surgical treatment for head and neck cancer. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(3):282–9.
doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.861869
pubmed: 24345002
Threader J, McCormack L. Cancer-related trauma, stigma and growth: the ‘lived’ experience of head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016;25(1):157–69.
doi: 10.1111/ecc.12320
pubmed: 25899673
Martinez J, Wong C, Piersol CV, Bieber DC, Perry BL, Leland NE. Stakeholder engagement in research: a scoping review of current evaluation methods. J Comp Eff Res. 2019;8(15):1327–41.
doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0047
pubmed: 31736341
Goodman MS, Ackermann N, Bowen DJ, Panel D, Thompson VS. Reaching Consensus on principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):117–27.
doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0014
pubmed: 32280129
pmcid: 7867997
Morain SR, Concannon TW, Wittenberg E. HIV, breast cancer and vaccines: what do high-profile cases reveal about stakeholder engagement in research? J Comp Eff Res. 2017;6(1):43–9.
doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0035
pubmed: 27586693
Tausch AP, Menold N. Methodological Aspects of Focus Groups in Health Research:results of qualitative interviews with Focus Group moderators. Global Qualitative Nurs Res. 2016;3:2333393616630466.