User Experience Testing of the Meta Quest 2 for Integration With the Virtual Reality Simulation for Dementia Coaching, Advocacy, Respite, Education, Relationship, and Simulation (VR-SIM CARERS) Program.

Caregivers (CGs) of persons with dementia (PWDs) face numerous challenges, including learning about the condition, managing behavioral symptoms, and prioritizing their own well-being. Virtual reality (VR) technology has emerged as a promising tool to adopt certain elements of existing CG psychoeducation programs, such as the Reitman Centre CARERS (coaching, advocacy, respite, education, relationship, and simulation) program, which has been shown effective in reducing CG burden and stress and building the required skills for caring for PWD. Recently, we have developed a VR prototype utilizing Meta Quest 2 (Meta, Menlo Park, CA, USA), which will be referred to as the (virtual reality simulation for dementia CARERS) VR-SIM CARERS program. This technical report aims to describe the early stages of intervention modeling by testing user experiences related to the hardware used. The Meta Quest 2 VR system is chosen for its accessibility and functionality, aiming to ensure widespread access. Through interviews and observational techniques, we explored CGs age-matched controls' attitudes, comfort, and proficiency with the Meta Quest 2 VR system, which are crucial for informing technological choices. Initial findings revealed mixed attitudes, comfort, and proficiency about the Meta Quest 2 VR system. Although further testing of the Meta Quest 2 VR system within the CG community is warranted, the interpretation of these preliminary results indicates that the VR-SIM CARERS program should have minimal technological skill requirements for user engagement or provide in-depth training resources for the CGs who choose to use the system.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, O'Hara et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ontario Tech University Research Ethics Board issued approval 22-031-B. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.