Quantifying value loss due to presenteeism and absenteeism in workers' compensation spinal patients.

Absenteeism Employment Presenteeism Return to work Spine surgery Workers’ compensation

Journal

North American Spine Society journal
ISSN: 2666-5484
Titre abrégé: N Am Spine Soc J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918335076906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 02 05 2024
revised: 05 07 2024
accepted: 09 07 2024
medline: 6 9 2024
pubmed: 6 9 2024
entrez: 6 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent studies suggest that better outcomes in work productivity following spine surgery eventually offset the higher cost of treatment. By analyzing preoperative and postoperative changes in work productivity, studies can determine if surgery is cost-effective and give patients valuable information about treatment. Prior studies reviewing outcomes in work performance after spine surgery have largely excluded patients on workers' compensation from the overall cost analysis. A retrospective review of 92 eligible patients was conducted. Evaluation of the EHR identified presenteeism and absenteeism from designated work restrictions. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP Pro 17. About 84 (83%) spinal surgery cases were able to return to work, 60 (59%) were able to return to work with no restrictions, 26 (26%) received permanent work restrictions, and 12 (12%) were still undergoing treatment. 86 (85%) experienced presenteeism and 99 (98%) experienced absenteeism. Of the cases that were able to return to work without permanent work restrictions, the mean presenteeism length postoperatively was 287.4 days (median 191 days) and the mean absenteeism length postoperatively was 232.5 days (median 142 days). 72 patients were identified as having sedentary or nonsedentary labor. After excluding outliers, the average return-to-work length was 988.62 days for patients with sedentary employment types and 952.15 days for patients with nonsedentary employment types (p=.116). Following spinal surgery, our worker's compensation patient population's return-to-work rate was at an average of 232.5 days (median of 142 days) for 83% of patients included in this study. This exhibited worse outcomes than a previous study's measurement excluding worker's compensation patients. Presenteeism length within our population contributed more to decreased work productivity postoperatively than absenteeism length. Our results found no significant difference in return-to-work length between patients with sedentary and nonsedentary employment types.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Recent studies suggest that better outcomes in work productivity following spine surgery eventually offset the higher cost of treatment. By analyzing preoperative and postoperative changes in work productivity, studies can determine if surgery is cost-effective and give patients valuable information about treatment. Prior studies reviewing outcomes in work performance after spine surgery have largely excluded patients on workers' compensation from the overall cost analysis.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A retrospective review of 92 eligible patients was conducted. Evaluation of the EHR identified presenteeism and absenteeism from designated work restrictions. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP Pro 17.
Results UNASSIGNED
About 84 (83%) spinal surgery cases were able to return to work, 60 (59%) were able to return to work with no restrictions, 26 (26%) received permanent work restrictions, and 12 (12%) were still undergoing treatment. 86 (85%) experienced presenteeism and 99 (98%) experienced absenteeism. Of the cases that were able to return to work without permanent work restrictions, the mean presenteeism length postoperatively was 287.4 days (median 191 days) and the mean absenteeism length postoperatively was 232.5 days (median 142 days). 72 patients were identified as having sedentary or nonsedentary labor. After excluding outliers, the average return-to-work length was 988.62 days for patients with sedentary employment types and 952.15 days for patients with nonsedentary employment types (p=.116).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Following spinal surgery, our worker's compensation patient population's return-to-work rate was at an average of 232.5 days (median of 142 days) for 83% of patients included in this study. This exhibited worse outcomes than a previous study's measurement excluding worker's compensation patients. Presenteeism length within our population contributed more to decreased work productivity postoperatively than absenteeism length. Our results found no significant difference in return-to-work length between patients with sedentary and nonsedentary employment types.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39239362
doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100527
pii: S2666-5484(24)00220-8
pmc: PMC11375133
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100527

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Francis Ogaban (F)

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Alex Coffman (A)

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Natalie Glass (N)

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Cassim Igram (C)

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Andrew Pugely (A)

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Catherine Olinger (C)

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Classifications MeSH