Improving the local excision strategy for rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy: Surgical and oncological results.

Chemoradiotherapy Local excision Mesorectal excision Rectal cancer Rectal sparing

Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 11 06 2024
revised: 01 08 2024
accepted: 23 08 2024
medline: 7 9 2024
pubmed: 7 9 2024
entrez: 6 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Local excision (LE) for good responders after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer is oncologically safe. Although the GRECCAR 2 trial did not demonstrate any advantages in morbidity, it provided useful information for optimising patient selection. This study assessed the impact of these results on our practice by focusing on the evolution of our selection criteria and management modalities for these patients over 10 years. Data were collected using our retrospective database of 110 patients who underwent LE after CRT for low and middle rectal cancer between 2010 and 2022 before (Group 1) and after (Group 2) consideration of the GRECCAR 2 trial results. The pretherapeutic selection criteria remained stable after the GRECCAR 2 trial, although in Group 2, completion total mesorectal excision (TME) for ypT2 tumours with favourable tumour regression grade was abandoned, improving the organ preservation rate at 1 year from 63.3 % to 91.8 % (p < 0.01). The operative time and length of stay after LE were reduced by half in Group 2 (p < 0.01). The intention-to-treat rate for severe morbidity was also halved, but was not significant (8.2 % vs. 16.3 %, p = 0.24). Among patients with a 3-year follow-up data, disease-free survival was comparable between Group 1 (89.8 %) and Group 2 (85.4 %) (p = 0.51) with one locoregional recurrence in each group (2.0 % vs. 2.1 %, p = 1). LE is a safe and effective strategy when performed in a "high-volume" centre. Improved methods for assessing tumour response and the selection criteria for completion TME enhanced surgical outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39241510
pii: S0748-7983(24)00691-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108639
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108639

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Hélène Meillat (H)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. Electronic address: meillath@ipc.unicancer.fr.

Victoria Weets (V)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.

Jacques-Emmanuel Saadoun (JE)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.

Marguerite Tyran (M)

Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Emmanuel Mitry (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Mathias Illy (M)

Department of Radiology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.

Cécile de Chaisemartin (C)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.

Bernard Lelong (B)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.

Classifications MeSH