The influence of ageism on the hallmarks of aging: Where age stigma and biology collide.
Dementia
Disability
Frailty
Inflammation
Mechanisms of aging
Journal
Experimental gerontology
ISSN: 1873-6815
Titre abrégé: Exp Gerontol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0047061
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
07
06
2024
revised:
28
08
2024
accepted:
03
09
2024
medline:
7
9
2024
pubmed:
7
9
2024
entrez:
6
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Ageism encompasses the creation of negative stereotypes of aging that culminate in the development of prejudicial thoughts and discriminatory actions against people in advanced age. Stereotypes refer to major characteristics, overgeneralized, not supported by observations, that are created to categorize, simplify, and combine complex characteristics, attributes, and behaviors shared by members of a group into more simplistic categories. Negative aging stereotypes include the assumption that old people are weak, reminiscent, sick, and tired, to quote a few. In early age, these views may generate intergenerational conflicts between young and old people, but they seem to have little effect on other aspects of life. However, in middle-aged and older adults, the presence of negative-self stereotypes of aging are significantly associated with several health parameters, including walking speed, cognitive function, mental health problems, accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Furthermore, observational studies have found that ageism might be associated with cardiovascular events, obesity, dementia, and death. These harmful effects are possibly mediated by the interaction between ageism and fundamental mechanisms of aging, mainly inflammation. Given the clinical implications of this relationship, the present manuscript provides a critical review of the available literature that examined associations between ageism and health parameters. We also discuss the main possible mechanisms underlying this scenario, the main limitations of the current literature, candidate strategies to counteract ageism, and directions to future studies. Finally, we provide a critical opinion of the current scenario and its potential adaptability to the clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39241989
pii: S0531-5565(24)00221-3
doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112575
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
112575Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.