Not all healthcare inequities in diabetes are equal: a comparison of two medically underserved cohorts.
Humans
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Healthcare Disparities
/ statistics & numerical data
California
/ epidemiology
Adult
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ epidemiology
Florida
/ epidemiology
Cohort Studies
Medically Underserved Area
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
/ epidemiology
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ analysis
Socioeconomic Factors
Diabetes Mellitus
/ epidemiology
Follow-Up Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Health Policy
Healthcare Disparities
Journal
BMJ open diabetes research & care
ISSN: 2052-4897
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101641391
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Sep 2024
05 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
28
03
2024
accepted:
15
08
2024
medline:
7
9
2024
pubmed:
7
9
2024
entrez:
6
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diabetes disparities exist based on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. The aim of this study is to compare two cohorts with diabetes from California and Florida to better elucidate how health outcomes are stratified within underserved communities according to state location, race, and ethnicity. Two cohorts were recruited for comparison from 20 Federally Qualified Health Centers as part of a larger ECHO Diabetes program. Participant-level data included surveys and HbA1c collection. Center-level data included Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set metrics. Demographic characteristics were summarized overall and stratified by state (frequencies, percentages, means (95% CIs)). Generalized linear mixed models were used to compute and compare model-estimated rates and means. Participant-level cohort: 582 adults with diabetes were recruited (33.0% type 1 diabetes (T1D), 67.0% type 2 diabetes (T2D)). Mean age was 51.1 years (95% CI 49.5, 52.6); 80.7% publicly insured or uninsured; 43.7% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 31.6% Hispanic, 7.9% non-Hispanic black (NHB) and 16.8% other. Center-level cohort: 32 796 adults with diabetes were represented (3.4% with T1D, 96.6% with T2D; 72.7% publicly insured or uninsured). Florida had higher rates of uninsured (p<0.0001), lower continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use (18.3% Florida; 35.9% California, p<0.0001), and pump use (10.2% Florida; 26.5% California, p<0.0001), and higher proportions of people with T1D/T2D>9% HbA1c (p<0.001). Risk was stratified within states with NHB participants having higher HbA1c (mean 9.5 (95% CI 8.9, 10.0) compared with NHW with a mean of 8.4 (95% CI 7.8, 9.0), p=0.0058), lower pump use (p=0.0426) and CGM use (p=0.0192). People who prefer to speak English were more likely to use a CGM (p=0.0386). Characteristics of medically underserved communities with diabetes vary by state and by race and ethnicity. Florida's lack of Medicaid expansion could be a factor in worsened risks for vulnerable communities with diabetes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39242122
pii: 12/4/e004229
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004229
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glycated Hemoglobin
0
hemoglobin A1c protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.