The relationship between corticospinal excitability and structural integrity in stroke patients.

corticospinal tract motor evoked potential recovery stroke

Journal

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
ISSN: 1468-330X
Titre abrégé: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985191R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 09 06 2023
accepted: 06 06 2024
medline: 7 9 2024
pubmed: 7 9 2024
entrez: 6 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Evaluation of the structural integrity and functional excitability of the corticospinal tract (CST) is likely to be important in predicting motor recovery after stroke. Previous reports are inconsistent regarding a possible link between CST structure and CST function in this setting. This study aims to investigate the structure‒function relationship of the CST at the acute phase of stroke (<7 days). We enrolled 70 patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with unilateral upper extremity (UE) weakness. They underwent a multimodal assessment including clinical severity (UE Fugl Meyer at day 7 and 3 months), MRI to evaluate the CST lesion load and transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure the maximum amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP). A cross-sectional lesion load above 87% predicted the absence of MEPs with an accuracy of 80.4%. In MEP-positive patients, the CST structure/function relationship was bimodal with a switch from a linear relationship (rho=-0.600, 95% CI -0.873; -0.039, p<0.03) for small MEP amplitudes (<0.703 mV) to a non-linear relationship for higher MEP amplitudes (p=0.72). In MEP-positive patients, recovery correlated with initial severity. In patients with a positive MEP <0.703 mV but not in patients with an MEP ≥0.703 mV, MEP amplitude was an additional independent predictor of recovery. In MEP-negative patients, we failed to identify any factor predicting recovery. This large multimodal study on the structure/function of the CST and stroke recovery proposes a paradigm change for the MEP-positive patients phenotypes and refines the nature of the link between structural integrity and neurophysiological function, with implications for study design and prognostic information.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Evaluation of the structural integrity and functional excitability of the corticospinal tract (CST) is likely to be important in predicting motor recovery after stroke. Previous reports are inconsistent regarding a possible link between CST structure and CST function in this setting. This study aims to investigate the structure‒function relationship of the CST at the acute phase of stroke (<7 days).
METHODS METHODS
We enrolled 70 patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with unilateral upper extremity (UE) weakness. They underwent a multimodal assessment including clinical severity (UE Fugl Meyer at day 7 and 3 months), MRI to evaluate the CST lesion load and transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure the maximum amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP).
RESULTS RESULTS
A cross-sectional lesion load above 87% predicted the absence of MEPs with an accuracy of 80.4%. In MEP-positive patients, the CST structure/function relationship was bimodal with a switch from a linear relationship (rho=-0.600, 95% CI -0.873; -0.039, p<0.03) for small MEP amplitudes (<0.703 mV) to a non-linear relationship for higher MEP amplitudes (p=0.72). In MEP-positive patients, recovery correlated with initial severity. In patients with a positive MEP <0.703 mV but not in patients with an MEP ≥0.703 mV, MEP amplitude was an additional independent predictor of recovery. In MEP-negative patients, we failed to identify any factor predicting recovery.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This large multimodal study on the structure/function of the CST and stroke recovery proposes a paradigm change for the MEP-positive patients phenotypes and refines the nature of the link between structural integrity and neurophysiological function, with implications for study design and prognostic information.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39242199
pii: jnnp-2023-331996
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331996
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Lina Daghsen (L)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
STARE team, iCRIN, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.

Thomas Checkouri (T)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
STARE team, iCRIN, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.

Aymric Wittwer (A)

STARE team, iCRIN, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.
AP-HP, Urgences Cérébro-Vasculaires, DMU Neurosciences, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Romain Valabregue (R)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
CENIR, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.

Damien Galanaud (D)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
CENIR, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.
AP-HP, Service de Neuroradiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

François-Xavier Lejeune (FX)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
Data Analysis Core, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.

Mohammed Doulazmi (M)

Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), Adaptation Biologique et Vieillissement, Paris, France.

Jean-Charles Lamy (JC)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
CENIR, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.

Pierre Pouget (P)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.

Emmanuel Roze (E)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
AP-HP, Département des Maladies du Système Nerveux, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Charlotte Rosso (C)

Institut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France charlotte.rosso@gmail.com.
STARE team, iCRIN, Institut du Cerveau ICM, Paris, France.
AP-HP, Urgences Cérébro-Vasculaires, DMU Neurosciences, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH