Exploring motivated reasoning in polarization over the unfolding 2023 judicial reform in Israel.
Journal
Communications psychology
ISSN: 2731-9121
Titre abrégé: Commun Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918716686206676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jun 2024
18 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
13
09
2023
accepted:
19
03
2024
medline:
7
9
2024
pubmed:
7
9
2024
entrez:
6
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This work explored polarization over Israel's Judicial Reform, introduced in January 2023. We find that the reform divided people into pro- and anti-reform camps, which differed in characteristics such as institutional trust, patriotism, and national identity. For example, the camps disagreed about trust in the government versus the judiciary. In line with motivated reasoning-biased reasoning processes used to reach desired conclusions-people's pre-existing characteristics motivated polarized views of the reform as a threat to democracy (issue-based polarization) and negative emotions towards opponents (affective polarization). Further demonstrating a motivated process, pro-reform participants (the electorate majority), prioritized majority rule over other democratic features (e.g., minority rights) compared to anti-reform participants. Polarization differentially predicted downstream consequences (e.g., protest methods), indicating that the camps' reactions were motivated by the extremity of their views and negative emotions. This work extends the understanding of potentially motivated polarization processes and their immediate downstream consequences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39242945
doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00080-x
pii: 10.1038/s44271-024-00080-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
59Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Carothers, T. & O’Donohue, A. Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. (Brookings Institution Press, 2019).
Somer, M. & McCoy, J. Déjà vu? Polarization and endangered democracies in the 21st century. Am. Behav. Sci. 62, 3–15 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/0002764218760371
Enders, A. M. Issues versus affect: how do elite and mass polarization compare? J. Politics 83, 1872–1877 (2021).
doi: 10.1086/715059
McCoy, J., Rahman, T. & Somer, M. Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. Am. Behav. Sci. 62, 16–42 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/0002764218759576
Robison, J. & Mullinix, K. J. Elite polarization and public opinion: how polarization is communicated and its effects. Polit. Commun. 33, 261–282 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S. J. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 22, 129–146 (2019).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
Lozada, M. Us or them? Social representations and imaginaries of the other in Venezuela. Pap. Soc. Represent. 23, 21.1–21.16 (2014).
Kunda, Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108, 480–498 (1990).
pubmed: 2270237
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Breuer, E. Justice Minister announced plans for judicial reform: What happens now? The Jerusalem Post (2023).
Constitution Committee approves for first reading proposed amendment to Basic Law: The Judiciary and Courts Bill. Knesset News. https://main.knesset.gov.il/en/news/pressreleases/pages/press13223e.aspx (2023).
The Proper Procedures for the Enactment of Constitutional Reform: Summary of Position Paper #3. The Israeli Law Professors’ Forum for Democracy. https://www.lawprofsforum.org/post/the-proper-procedures-for-the-enactment-of-constitutional-reform-summary-of-position-paper (2023).
The Revolutionary Regime Transformation: A Summary Opinion #5. The Israeli Law Professors’ Forum for Democracy https://www.lawprofsforum.org/post/the-revolutionary-regimetransformation-a-summary-opinion-5 (2023).
The central Elections Committee of the 25th Knesset. https://votes25.bechirot.gov.il/ (2023).
Chabin, M. Israeli scientists speak out against ‘destructive’ education policies. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk2723 (2023).
Albin, E., Bressler, S., Rolls, A., Schwartz, M. & Shapiro, E. No democracy, no academia. Science 381, 715–715 (2023).
pubmed: 37590362
doi: 10.1126/science.adk3054
Haaretz. Thousands Israeli health professionals to join general strike in protest of judicial overhaul. Haaretz (2023).
Gold, R., Greene, R. A. & Tal, A. Israel passed a bill to limit the Supreme Court’s power. Here’s what comes next. CNN (2023).
Vachudova, A. M. Ethnopopulism and democratic backsliding in Central Europe. East Eur. Politics 36, 318–340 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/21599165.2020.1787163
Bozóki, A. & Hegedűs, D. An externally constrained hybrid regime: Hungary in the European Union. Democratization 25, 1173–1189 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1455664
Ágh, A. The Orbán regime as the ‘perfect autocracy’: the emergence of the ‘zombie democracy’ in Hungary. Politics in Central Europe 18, 1–25 (2022).
doi: 10.2478/pce-2022-0001
Bogaards, M. De-democratization in Hungary: diffusely defective democracy. Democratization 25, 1481–1499 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1485015
Fomina, J. & Kucharczyk, J. Populism and protest in Poland. J. Democr. 27, 58–68 (2016).
doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0062
Daly, T. G. Understanding multi-directional democratic decay: lessons from the rise of Bolsonaro in Brazil. Law Ethics Hum. Rights 14, 199–226 (2020).
doi: 10.1515/lehr-2020-2014
Gidron, N., Sheffer, L. & Mor, G. The Israel polarization panel dataset, 2019–2021. Elect. Stud. 80, 102512 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102512
Coppedge, M. et al. V-Dem Dataset v13. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/VDEMDS23 (2023).
Jamal, A. The rise of ‘bad civil society’ in Israel: nationalist civil society organizations and the politics of delegitimization. Social Science Open Access Repository 2, 1–8 (2018).
Jamal, A. & Kensicki, A. Theorizing half-statelessness: a case study of the Nation-State Law in Israel. Citizensh. Stud. 24, 769–785 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/13621025.2020.1745152
Tepe, S. The perils of polarization and religious parties: the democratic challenges of political fragmentation in Israel and Turkey. Democratization 20, 831–856 (2013).
doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.801254
Smooha, S. Minority status in an ethnic democracy: the status of the Arab minority in Israel. Ethn. Racial Stud. 13, 389–413 (1990).
doi: 10.1080/01419870.1990.9993679
Smooha, S. The model of ethnic democracy: Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. Nations Natl 8, 475–503 (2002).
doi: 10.1111/1469-8219.00062
Berent, M. The ethnic democracy debate: how unique is Israel?: The ethnic democracy debate. Nations Natl 16, 657–674 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2009.00421.x
Ghanem, A. The expanding ethnocracy Judaization of the public sphere. Israel Stud. Rev. 26, 21–27 (2011).
Ben Porat, G. & Filc, D. Remember to be Jewish: religious populism in Israel. Politics Relig. 15, 61–84 (2022).
doi: 10.1017/S1755048320000681
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C. & Polavin, N. Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Commun. Res. 47, 104–124 (2020).
doi: 10.1177/0093650217719596
Arieli, S., Amit, A. & Mentser, S. Identity-motivated reasoning: biased judgments regarding political leaders and their actions. Cognition 188, 64–73 (2019).
pubmed: 30579612
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.009
Derreumaux, Y., Bergh, R. & Hughes, B. L. Partisan-motivated sampling: Re-examining politically motivated reasoning across the information processing stream. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 123, 316–336 (2022).
pubmed: 35420863
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000375
Ditto, P. H. et al. At least bias is bipartisan: a meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspect Psychol. Sci. 14, 273–291 (2019).
pubmed: 29851554
doi: 10.1177/1745691617746796
Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M. & Colucci, F. P. To feel or not to feel when my group harms others? The regulation of collective guilt as motivated reasoning. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull 41, 1223–1235 (2015).
pubmed: 26130597
doi: 10.1177/0146167215592843
Jenke, L. Affective polarization and misinformation belief. Polit. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09851-w . (2023).
Hadarics, M. & Kende, A. Negative stereotypes as motivated justifications for moral exclusion. J. Soc. Psychol. 159, 257–269 (2019).
pubmed: 29578845
doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1456396
Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Political Sci. 50, 755–769 (2006).
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. The illusion of choice in democratic politics: the unconscious impact of motivated political reasoning. Polit. Psychol. 37, 61–85 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/pops.12321
Vallier, K. Trust in a Polarized Age. (Oxford University Press, 2021).
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190887223.001.0001
Reiljan, A. & Ryan, A. Ideological tripolarization, partisan tribalism and institutional trust: the foundations of affective polarization in the Swedish multiparty system. Scand. Polit. Stud. 44, 195–219 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12194
Reiljan, A., Garzia, D., Ferreira Da Silva, F. & Trechsel, A. H. Patterns of affective polarization toward parties and leaders across the democratic world. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000485 (2023).
Banda, K. K. & Kirkland, J. H. Legislative party polarization and trust in state legislatures. Am. Polit. Res. 46, 596–628 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/1532673X17727317
Boda, Z. & Medve-Bálint, G. Politicized institutional trust in East Central Europe. Taiwan J. Democr. 16, 27–49 (2020).
Rekker, R. The nature and origins of political polarization over science. Public Underst. Sci. 30, 352–368 (2021).
pubmed: 33594929
pmcid: 8114456
doi: 10.1177/0963662521989193
Hetherington, M. “Why polarized trust matters”. Forum 13, 445–458 (2015).
Hetherington, M. J. & Rudolph, T. J. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2015).
Jones, D. R. Declining trust in congress: effects of polarization and consequences for democracy. Forum 13, 375–394 (2015).
Dekel, R. & Tuval-Mashiach, R. Multiple losses of social resources following collective trauma: the case of the forced relocation from Gush Katif. Psychol. Trauma: Theory Res. Pract. Policy 4, 56–65 (2012).
doi: 10.1037/a0019912
Hermann, T. et al. The National-Religious Sector in Israel 2014: Main Findings (Israel Democracy Institute, 2014).
Ben-Rafael, E. & Peres, Y. Is Israel One? (Brill, 2005).
Davidov, E. Measurement equivalence of nationalism and constructive patriotism in the ISSP: 34 countries in a comparative perspective. Polit. Anal. 17, 64–82 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/pan/mpn014
Schatz, R. T., Staub, E. & Lavine, H. On the varieties of national attachment: blind versus constructive patriotism. Polit. Psychol. 20, 151–174 (1999).
doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00140
Blank, T. & Schmidt, P. National identity in a United Germany: nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Polit. Psychol. 24, 289–312 (2003).
doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00329
Hechter, M. Nationalism and rationality. JWSR 308–329. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.226 . (2000).
Perry, S. L. & Schleifer, C. My country, white or wrong: Christian nationalism, race, and blind patriotism. Ethn. Racial Stud. 46, 1249–1268 (2023).
doi: 10.1080/01419870.2022.2113420
Whitehead, A. L. & Perry, S. L. Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States. (Oxford University Press, 2020).
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190057886.001.0001
Handelman, D. Contradictions between citizenship and nationality: their consequences for ethnicity and inequality in Israel. Int. J. Polit. Cult. Soc. 7, 441–459 (1994).
doi: 10.1007/BF02142133
Ram, U. National, ethnic or civic? Contensting paradigms of memory, identity and culture in Israel. Stud. Philos. Educ. 19, 405–422 (2000).
doi: 10.1023/A:1005211009924
Diesendruck, G., Birnbaum, D., Deeb, I. & Segall, G. Learning what is essential: relative and absolute changes in children’s beliefs about the heritability of ethnicity. J. Cogn. Dev. 14, 546–560 (2013).
doi: 10.1080/15248372.2012.691142
Katzir, M., Hoffmann, M. & Liberman, N. Disgust as an essentialist emotion that signals nonviolent outgrouping with potentially low social costs. Emotion 19, 841–862 (2019).
pubmed: 30148375
doi: 10.1037/emo0000480
Segall, G., Birnbaum, D., Deeb, I. & Diesendruck, G. The intergenerational transmission of ethnic essentialism: how parents talk counts the most. Dev. Sci. 18, 543–555 (2015).
pubmed: 25212249
doi: 10.1111/desc.12235
Yuchtman-Yaar, E., Alkalay, Y. & Aival, T. Effects of religious identity and ethnicity on the Israeli-Jewish electorate. Isr. Stud. Rev. 33, 1–20 (2018).
doi: 10.3167/isr.2018.330302
De Figueiredo, R. J. P. & Elkins, Z. Are patriots bigots? An inquiry into the vices of in-group pride. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 47, 171–188 (2003).
Schwartz, S. H. Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 38, 711–728 (2007).
doi: 10.1177/0022022107308992
Hellström, A., Nilsson, T. & Stoltz, P. Nationalism vs. nationalism: the challenge of the Sweden democrats in the Swedish public debate. Gov. Oppos. 47, 186–205 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2011.01357.x
Berti, C. Right-wing populism and the criminalization of sea-rescue NGOs: the ‘Sea-Watch 3’ case in Italy, and Matteo Salvini’s communication on Facebook. Media Cult. Soc. 43, 532–550 (2021).
doi: 10.1177/0163443720957564
Yamagishi, T. & Yamagishi, M. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motiv. Emot. 18, 129–166 (1994).
doi: 10.1007/BF02249397
Schwartz, S. H. et al. Refining the theory of basic individual values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103, 663–688 (2012).
pubmed: 22823292
doi: 10.1037/a0029393
Rapp, C. Moral opinion polarization and the erosion of trust. Soc. Sci. Res. 58, 34–45 (2016).
pubmed: 27194650
doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.02.008
Torcal, M. & Thomson, Z. A. Social trust and affective polarization in Spain (2014–19). Elect. Stud. 81, 102582 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102582
Skoog, L. & Karlsson, D. Perceptions of polarization among political representatives. Polit. Res. Exch. 4, 2124923 (2022).
Uslaner, E. M. The moral foundations of Trust. SSRN J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.824504 (2002).
Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H. & Davidov, E. Basic personal values and the meaning of left‐right political orientations in 20 countries. Polit. Psychol. 32, 537–561 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x
Tang, T., Ghorbani, A., Squazzoni, F. & Chorus, C. G. Together alone: a group-based polarization measurement. Qual. Quant. 56, 3587–3619 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01271-y
Ross, L., Greene, D. & House, P. The “false consensus effect”: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13, 279–301 (1977).
doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
Enders, A. M. & Armaly, M. T. The differential effects of actual and perceived polarization. Polit. Behav. 41, 815–839 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11109-018-9476-2
Elad-Strenger, J. & Shahar, G. Revisiting the effects of societal threat perceptions on conflict-related positions: a three-wave study. J. Confl. Resolut. 62, 1753–1783 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/0022002717703684
Lewicki, R. J., Hiam, A. & Olander, K., W. in Think Before You Speak: A Complete Guide to Strategic Negotiation 54–75 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996).
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H. & Chao, M. M. Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts. Nat. Commun. 12, 3313 (2021).
pubmed: 34083528
pmcid: 8175723
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23432-1
Yang, J. et al. Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries. J. Comput-Mediat. Comm. 21, 349–367 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12166
Iyengar, S., Sood, G. & Lelkes, Y. Affect, not ideology. Public Opin. Q. 76, 405–431 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs038
Abramowitz, A. & McCoy, J. United States: racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 681, 137–156 (2019).
doi: 10.1177/0002716218811309
Kingzette, J. et al. How affective polarization undermines support for democratic norms. Public Opin. Q. 85, 663–677 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/poq/nfab029
Torcal, M. & Magalhães, P. C. Ideological extremism, perceived party system polarization, and support for democracy. Eur. Pol. Sci. Rev. 14, 188–205 (2022).
doi: 10.1017/S1755773922000066
ISSP Research Group. International Social Survey Programme: National Identity III - ISSP 2013International Social Survey Programme: National Identity III - ISSP 2013. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12312 (2015).
Schwartz, S. H. et al. Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 32, 519–542 (2001).
doi: 10.1177/0022022101032005001
Halali, E., Dorfman, A., Jun, S. & Halevy, N. More for us or more for me? Social dominance as parochial egoism. Soc. Psychol. Person. Sci. 9, 254–262 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/1948550617732819
Proch, J., Elad‐Strenger, J. & Kessler, T. Liberalism and conservatism, for a change! rethinking the association between political orientation and relation to societal change. Polit. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12559 (2018).
Lammers, J., Crusius, J. & Gast, A. Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 16264–16266 (2020).
pubmed: 32581118
pmcid: 7368332
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006048117
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Bago, B. & Rand, D. G. Beliefs About COVID-19 in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: a novel test of political polarization and motivated reasoning. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 48, 750–765 (2022).
pubmed: 34180276
doi: 10.1177/01461672211023652
Schatz, R. T. in Handbook of Patriotism (ed. Sardoč, M.) 613–631 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Ariely, G. Globalization, immigration and national identity: how the level of globalization affects the relations between nationalism, constructive patriotism and attitudes toward immigrants? Group Process. Intergr. Relat. 15, 539–557 (2012).
doi: 10.1177/1368430211430518
Erhardt, J., Wamsler, S. & Freitag, M. National identity between democracy and autocracy: a comparative analysis of 24 countries. Eur. Pol. Sci. Rev. 13, 59–76 (2021).
doi: 10.1017/S1755773920000351
Piwoni, E. & Mußotter, M. The evolution of the civic–ethnic distinction as a partial success story: lessons for the nationalism–patriotism distinction. Nations Natl 29, 906–921 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/nana.12944
Gidengil, E., Stolle, D. & Bergeron‐Boutin, O. The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding: a comparative perspective. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 61, 901–929 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12502
Graham, M. H. & Svolik, M. W. Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 114, 392–409 (2020).
doi: 10.1017/S0003055420000052
Porat, R., Tamir, M. & Halperin, E. Group-based emotion regulation: a motivated approach. Emotion 20, 16–20 (2020).
pubmed: 31961172
doi: 10.1037/emo0000639
Spanovic, M., Lickel, B., Denson, T. F. & Petrovic, N. Fear and anger as predictors of motivation for intergroup aggression: evidence from Serbia and Republika Srpska. Group Process. Intergr. Relat. 13, 725–739 (2010).
doi: 10.1177/1368430210374483
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. (Houghton Mifflin, 2001).
Blass, N. in State of the Nation Report 2018 (ed. Weiss, A.) 157–177 (Taub Center, 2018).
Resnik, J. Particularistic vs. universalistic content in the Israeli education system. Curriculum Inq. 29, 485–511 (1999).
doi: 10.1111/0362-6784.00143
Pinson, H. Neo Zionist right-wing populist discourse and activism in the Israel education system. Glob. Soc. Educ. 20, 124–137 (2022).
Pinson, H. In Citizenship, Education and Social Conflict (Routledge, 2010).
Pinson, H. & Agbaria, A. K. Ethno-nationalism in citizenship education in Israel: an analysis of the official civics textbook. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 42, 733–751 (2021).
doi: 10.1080/01425692.2021.1902277