Let's not abandon programmed frozen embryo transfers yet: a countercurrent perspective.
Adenomyosis
Endometriosis
Frozen embryo transfer
Oestradiol and progesterone programming
Pre-eclampsia
Journal
Reproductive biomedicine online
ISSN: 1472-6491
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biomed Online
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101122473
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jul 2024
06 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
26
05
2024
revised:
01
07
2024
accepted:
02
07
2024
medline:
8
9
2024
pubmed:
8
9
2024
entrez:
7
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The countercurrent opinion given in this paper is that the optimal management of frozen embryo transfers (FET) is not a one-size-fits-all matter, but rather one that should be decided after considering all the various parameters and options. This choice should notably encompass patients' individual characteristics - including variable risks of obstetric complications - and weigh out the respective advantages of each FET option in each case. While there may be real advantages for natural-cycle FET in many cases, these need to be balanced against both practical and clinical issues. Contrary to several prevailing, sometimes loudly expressed suggestions, there is not a one single effective approach when it comes to choosing a mode of scheduling FET.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39243633
pii: S1472-6483(24)00554-6
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104365
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104365Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.