Effect of a comfort scale compared with a pain numerical rate scale on opioids consumption in postanaesthesia care unit: the COMFORT study.

comfort scale communication pain numerical rate scale postoperative analgesia postoperative pain

Journal

British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 18 03 2024
revised: 31 05 2024
accepted: 10 06 2024
medline: 8 9 2024
pubmed: 8 9 2024
entrez: 7 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The way that pain is assessed in the PACU could impact on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. However, there is currently no evidence to support this speculation. The authors hypothesised that using a comfort scale reduces postoperative opioid consumption when compared with a standard numerical rating scale (NRS) to evaluate pain in the PACU. In this cluster-randomised trial, patients were assessed using either a comfort scale (comfort group) or a pain NRS (NRS group). The primary outcome was the opioid consumption in the PACU. The main secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, length of stay in the PACU, and satisfaction. Of 885 randomised patients, 860 were included in the analysis. Opioid consumption in the PACU was comparable in the comfort and NRS groups (median [interquartile range [IQR] 0 (0-5) vs 0 (0-6); P=0.2436), irrespective of the type of surgical procedure. The majority of patients did not need any postoperative opioid (59% in the comfort group and 56% in the NRS group, P=0.2260). There was no difference in postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, time to reach an Aldrete score ≥9 after extubation, and global satisfaction. Using a comfort scale to assess pain in the PACU did not spare any opioid compared with use of a standard NRS. Further studies focusing on patients at risk of increased postoperative opioid consumption are necessary. NCT05234216.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The way that pain is assessed in the PACU could impact on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. However, there is currently no evidence to support this speculation. The authors hypothesised that using a comfort scale reduces postoperative opioid consumption when compared with a standard numerical rating scale (NRS) to evaluate pain in the PACU.
METHODS METHODS
In this cluster-randomised trial, patients were assessed using either a comfort scale (comfort group) or a pain NRS (NRS group). The primary outcome was the opioid consumption in the PACU. The main secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, length of stay in the PACU, and satisfaction.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 885 randomised patients, 860 were included in the analysis. Opioid consumption in the PACU was comparable in the comfort and NRS groups (median [interquartile range [IQR] 0 (0-5) vs 0 (0-6); P=0.2436), irrespective of the type of surgical procedure. The majority of patients did not need any postoperative opioid (59% in the comfort group and 56% in the NRS group, P=0.2260). There was no difference in postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, time to reach an Aldrete score ≥9 after extubation, and global satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Using a comfort scale to assess pain in the PACU did not spare any opioid compared with use of a standard NRS. Further studies focusing on patients at risk of increased postoperative opioid consumption are necessary.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NCT05234216.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39244480
pii: S0007-0912(24)00400-8
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.029
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05234216']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nicolas Fusco (N)

CHU Rennes, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Rennes, France; Private Hospital, Anesthesia Department, Saint-Grégoire, France; Hypnosis Institute, Émergences Campus, F-35000 Rennes, France.

Ludovic Meuret (L)

CHU Rennes, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, CIC 1414, Rennes, France.

Franck Bernard (F)

Private Hospital, Anesthesia Department, Saint-Grégoire, France; Hypnosis Institute, Émergences Campus, F-35000 Rennes, France.

Hervé Musellec (H)

Private Hospital, Anesthesia Department, Saint-Grégoire, France; Hypnosis Institute, Émergences Campus, F-35000 Rennes, France.

Laure Martin (L)

Private Hospital, Anesthesia Department, Saint-Grégoire, France; Hypnosis Institute, Émergences Campus, F-35000 Rennes, France.

Mathilde Léonard (M)

CHU Rennes, Inserm, CIC 1414, Rennes, France.

Sigismond Lasocki (S)

CHU d'Angers, University of Angers, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Angers, France.

Thierry Gazeau (T)

Clinique Jules Verne, Department of Anaesthesiology, Nantes, France.

Romain Aubertin (R)

Clinique Saint-Jean, Department of Anaesthesiology, Saint-Jean-de-Védas, France.

Dorothée Blayac (D)

Clinique du Parc, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lyon, France.

Florient Leviel (F)

CHU Amiens-Picardie, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Amiens, France.

Marc Danguy des Deserts (M)

HIA Clermont-Tonnerre, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Brest, Inserm, UMR1304-GETBO, Brest, France.

Samia Madi-Jebara (S)

Hôpital Hôtel Dieu de France, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Beirut, Lebanon.

Julien Fessler (J)

Hôpital Foch, Department of Anesthesiology, Suresnes, France; Department of anesthesiology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France.

Sylvain Lecoeur (S)

CH Saint-Brieuc, Department of Anesthesiology, Saint-Brieuc, France.

Cédric Cirenei (C)

CHU Lille, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medecine, Lille, France.

Rémi Menut (R)

CHU Toulouse Purpan, Hôpital Riquet, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, University Toulouse 3-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

Clément Lebreton (C)

Polyclinique Saint-Laurent, Department of Anesthesiology, Rennes, France.

Stéphane Bouvier (S)

Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste, Department of Anesthesiology, Grenoble, France.

Claire Bonnet (C)

CHU Toulouse, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

Axel Maurice-Szamburski (A)

Clinique Juge, Almaviva, Department of Anesthesiology, Marseille, France.

Mathilde Cattenoz (M)

CH Fleyriat, Department of Anesthesiology, Bourg-en-Bresse, France.

Magida El Alami (M)

CH La Rochelle, Department of Anesthesiology, La Rochelle, France.

Elsa Brocas (E)

CH Sud Francilien, Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Department, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.

Christophe Aveline (C)

Hôpital Privé Sévigné, Department of Anesthesiology, Cesson-Sévigné, France.

Ludovic Gueguen (L)

CH Bretagne Atlantique, Department of Anesthesiology, Vannes, France.

Eric Noll (E)

CHU Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Strasbourg, France.

Aurélie Gouel-Chéron (A)

Hopital Beaujon, Departement of Anesthsiology, Paris Cité Université, Paris, France; Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, DMU PARABOL, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, Paris, France.

Olivier Evrard (O)

CHU Tours Hôpital Bretonneau, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tours, France.

Mathieu Fontaine (M)

Hôpital Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Lyon, France.

Yên-Lan Nguyen (YL)

Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Céline Ravry (C)

CH Dax-Côte d'Argent, Department of Anesthesiology, Dax, France.

Emmanuel Boselli (E)

CH Pierre Oudot, Department of Anesthesiology, Bourgoin-Jallieu, France.

Bruno Laviolle (B)

CHU Rennes, University of Rennes, Inserm, UMR_S 1085, CIC 1414, Rennes, France.

Helene Beloeil (H)

University of Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, COSS1242, CIC 1414, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Rennes, France. Electronic address: helene.beloeil@chu-rennes.fr.

Classifications MeSH