Prenatal diagnosis for neurofibromatosis type 1 and the pitfalls of germline mosaics.


Journal

NPJ genomic medicine
ISSN: 2056-7944
Titre abrégé: NPJ Genom Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685193

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 24 01 2024
accepted: 30 08 2024
medline: 9 9 2024
pubmed: 9 9 2024
entrez: 8 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We report our 5-year experience in neurofibromatosis type 1 prenatal diagnosis (PND): 205 PNDs in 146 women (chorionic villus biopsies, 88% or amniocentesis, 12%). The NF1 variant was present in 85 (41%) and absent in 122 (59%) fetuses. Among 205 pregnancies (207 fetuses), 135 were carried to term (119 unaffected and 16 NF1 affected children), 69 pregnancy terminations (affected fetuses), 2 miscarriages, and 1 in utero death. The majority of PND requests came from parents with sporadic NF1. We describe two PNDs in women with mosaic NF1. In both families, direct PND showed the absence of the maternal NF1 variant in the fetus. However, microsatellite markers analysis showed that the risk haplotype had been transmitted. These rare cases of germline mosaicism illustrate the pitfall of indirect PND. Our study illustrates the crucial consequences of PND for medical and genetic counseling decisions. We also point to the challenges of germline mosaics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39245665
doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00425-9
pii: 10.1038/s41525-024-00425-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

41

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Bergqvist, C. et al. Neurofibromatosis 1 French national guidelines based on an extensive literature review since 1966. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 15, 37 (2020).
pubmed: 32014052 pmcid: 6998847 doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-1310-3
Cimino, P. J. & Gutmann, D. H. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 148, 799–811 (2018).
pubmed: 29478615 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00051-X
Jett, K. & Friedman, J. M. Clinical and genetic aspects of neurofibromatosis 1. Genet. Med. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 12, 1–11 (2010).
Legius, E. et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome: an international consensus recommendation. Genet. Med. 23, 1506–1513 (2021).
pubmed: 34012067 pmcid: 8354850 doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01170-5
Neurofibromatosis. Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Arch. Neurol. 45, 575–578 (1988).
Koczkowska, M. et al. Genotype–phenotype correlation in NF1: evidence for a more severe phenotype associated with missense mutations affecting NF1 codons 844–848. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102, 69–87 (2018).
pubmed: 29290338 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.001
Koczkowska, M. et al. Expanding the clinical phenotype of individuals with a 3-bp in-frame deletion of the NF1 gene (c.2970_2972del): an update of genotype–phenotype correlation. Genet. Med. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 21, 867–876 (2019).
Koczkowska, M. et al. Clinical spectrum of individuals with pathogenic NF1 missense variants affecting p.Met1149, p.Arg1276, and p.Lys1423: genotype–phenotype study in neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum. Mutat. 41, 299–315 (2020).
pubmed: 31595648 doi: 10.1002/humu.23929
Upadhyaya, M. et al. An absence of cutaneous neurofibromas associated with a 3-bp inframe deletion in exon 17 of the NF1 gene (c.2970-2972 delAAT): evidence of a clinically significant NF1 genotype–phenotype correlation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 140–151 (2007).
pubmed: 17160901 doi: 10.1086/510781
Rojnueangnit, K. et al. High incidence of noonan syndrome features including short stature and pulmonic stenosis in patients carrying NF1 missense mutations affecting p.Arg1809: genotype–phenotype correlation. Hum. Mutat. 36, 1052–1063 (2015).
pubmed: 26178382 pmcid: 5049609 doi: 10.1002/humu.22832
Pasmant, E. et al. NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype. Hum. Mutat. 31, E1506–E1518 (2010).
pubmed: 20513137 doi: 10.1002/humu.21271
Gutmann, D. H. et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 3, 17004 (2017).
pubmed: 28230061 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.4
Sabbagh, A. et al. Unravelling the genetic basis of variable clinical expression in neurofibromatosis 1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 2768–2778 (2009).
pubmed: 19417008 pmcid: 2722187 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp212
Pacot, L. et al. Identification of potential common genetic modifiers of neurofibromas: a genome wide association study in 1333 neurofibromatosis type 1 patient. Br. J. Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad390 (2023).
Pasmant, E., Vidaud, M., Vidaud, D. & Wolkenstein, P. Neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype. J. Med. Genet. 49, 483–489 (2012).
pubmed: 22889851 doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100978
Ratner, N. & Miller, S. J. A RASopathy gene commonly mutated in cancer: the neurofibromatosis type 1 tumour suppressor. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 290–301 (2015).
pubmed: 25877329 pmcid: 4822336 doi: 10.1038/nrc3911
Sabbagh, A. et al. NF1 molecular characterization and neurofibromatosis type I genotype–phenotype correlation: the French experience. Hum. Mutat. 34, 1510–1518 (2013).
pubmed: 23913538 doi: 10.1002/humu.22392
Pacot, L. et al. Severe phenotype in patients with large deletions of NF1. Cancers 13, 2963 (2021).
pubmed: 34199217 pmcid: 8231977 doi: 10.3390/cancers13122963
Pacot, L. et al. Droplet digital PCR for fast and accurate characterization of NF1 locus deletions: confirmation of the predominant maternal origin of type-1 deletions. J. Mol. Diagn. JMD https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.11.005 (2023).
Pasmant, E. et al. Identification of genes potentially involved in the increased risk of malignancy in NF1-microdeleted patients. Mol. Med. Camb. Mass 17, 79–87 (2011).
pubmed: 20844836
Biesecker, L. G. & Spinner, N. B. A genomic view of mosaicism and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 307–320 (2013).
pubmed: 23594909 doi: 10.1038/nrg3424
Samuels, M. E. & Friedman, J. M. Genetic mosaics and the germ line lineage. Genes 6, 216–237 (2015).
pubmed: 25898403 pmcid: 4488662 doi: 10.3390/genes6020216
Veltman, J. A. & Brunner, H. G. De novo mutations in human genetic disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 565–575 (2012).
pubmed: 22805709 doi: 10.1038/nrg3241
Messiaen, L. M. et al. Exhaustive mutation analysis of the NF1 gene allows identification of 95% of mutations and reveals a high frequency of unusual splicing defects. Hum. Mutat. 15, 541–555 (2000).
pubmed: 10862084 doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200006)15:6<541::AID-HUMU6>3.0.CO;2-N
Cook, C. B. et al. Somatic mosaicism detected by genome-wide sequencing in 500 parent–child trios with suspected genetic disease: clinical and genetic counseling implications. Mol. Case Stud. 7, a006125 (2021).
doi: 10.1101/mcs.a006125
Brems, H. et al. Review and update of SPRED1 mutations causing Legius syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 33, 1538–1546 (2012).
pubmed: 22753041 doi: 10.1002/humu.22152
Garcia, B. et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 families with first-degree relatives harbouring distinct NF1 pathogenic variants. Genetic counselling and familial diagnosis: What should be offered? J. Med. Genet. 59, 1017–1023 (2022).
pubmed: 35121649 doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108301
Rietman, A. B. et al. Worries and needs of adults and parents of adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 176, 1150–1160 (2018).
pubmed: 29681082 pmcid: 5947156 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38680
Cesaretti, C. et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and pregnancy: maternal complications and attitudes about prenatal diagnosis. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 161, 386–388 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35720
Origone, P. et al. The genoa experience of prenatal diagnosis in NF1. Prenat. Diagn. 20, 719–724 (2000).
pubmed: 11015700 doi: 10.1002/1097-0223(200009)20:9<719::AID-PD895>3.0.CO;2-X
Radtke, H. B. et al. Genetic counseling for neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, and schwannomatosis-practice resource of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J. Genet. Couns. 29, 692–714 (2020).
pubmed: 32602153 doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1303
Vernimmen, V. et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for neurofibromatosis type 1: more than 20 years of clinical experience. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01404-x (2023).
Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–424 (2015).
pubmed: 25741868 pmcid: 4544753 doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30
Park, V. M. & Pivnick, E. K. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): a protein truncation assay yielding identification of mutations in 73% of patients. J. Med. Genet. 35, 813–820 (1998).
pubmed: 9783703 pmcid: 1051455 doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.10.813
Mattocks, C. et al. Automated comparative sequence analysis identifies mutations in 89% of NF1 patients and confirms a mutation cluster in exons 11–17 distinct from the GAP related domain. J. Med. Genet. 41, e48 (2004).
pubmed: 15060124 pmcid: 1735749 doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.011890
De Luca, A. et al. Novel and recurrent mutations in the NF1 gene in Italian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum. Mutat. 23, 629 (2004).
pubmed: 15146469 doi: 10.1002/humu.9245
Nemethova, M. et al. Thirty-nine novel neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) gene mutations identified in Slovak patients. Ann. Hum. Genet. 77, 364–379 (2013).
pubmed: 23758643 doi: 10.1111/ahg.12026
Giugliano, T. et al. Clinical and genetic findings in children with neurofibromatosis type 1, legius syndrome, and other related neurocutaneous disorders. Genes 10, 580 (2019).
pubmed: 31370276 pmcid: 6722641 doi: 10.3390/genes10080580
Pros, E. et al. Nature and mRNA effect of 282 different NF1 point mutations: focus on splicing alterations. Hum. Mutat. 29, E173–E193 (2008).
pubmed: 18546366 doi: 10.1002/humu.20826
Yao, R., Wang, L., Yu, Y., Wang, J. & Shen, Y. Diagnostic value of multiple café-au-lait macules for neurofibromatosis 1 in Chinese children. J. Dermatol. 43, 537–542 (2016).
pubmed: 26458495 doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13169
Gold, N. B., Nadel, A. & Green, R. C. Ready or not, genomic screening of fetuses is already here. Genet. Med. 26, 101008 (2024).
pubmed: 37860970 doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.101008
Severijns, Y., de Die-Smulders, C. E. M., Gültzow, T., de Vries, H. & van Osch, La. D. M. Hereditary diseases and child wish: exploring motives, considerations, and the (joint) decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples. J. Community Genet. 12, 325–335 (2021).
pubmed: 33611773 pmcid: 8241960 doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00510-x
Chohan, H. et al. Neurofibromin haploinsufficiency results in altered spermatogenesis in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1. PLoS One 13, e0208835 (2018).
pubmed: 30571760 pmcid: 6301684 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208835
Bianchi, D. W. & Chiu, R. W. K. Sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA during pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 464–473 (2018).
pubmed: 30067923 pmcid: 10123508 doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1705345
Rose, N. C. et al. Systematic evidence-based review: the application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies. Genet. Med. 24, 1379–1391 (2022).
pubmed: 35608568 doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.019
Young, E. et al. Clinical service delivery of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis by relative haplotype dosage for single-gene disorders. J. Mol. Diagn. JMD 22, 1151–1161 (2020).
pubmed: 32553884 doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.06.001
Zemet, R., Van Den Veyver, I. B. & Stankiewicz, P. Parental mosaicism for apparent de novo genetic variants: scope, detection, and counseling challenges. Prenat. Diagn. 42, 811–821 (2022).
pubmed: 35394072 pmcid: 9995893 doi: 10.1002/pd.6144
Campbell, I. M. et al. Parent of origin, mosaicism, and recurrence risk: probabilistic modeling explains the broken symmetry of transmission genetics. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 95, 345–359 (2014).
pubmed: 25242496 pmcid: 4185125 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.08.010
Pasmant, E. & Pacot, L. Should we genotype the sperm of fathers from patients with ‘de novo’ mutations? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 182, C1–C3 (2020).
pubmed: 31658441 doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0759
Vermeesch, J. R., Voet, T. & Devriendt, K. Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 643–656 (2016).
pubmed: 27629932 doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.97
Pasmant, E. et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 molecular diagnosis: What can NGS do for you when you have a large gene with loss of function mutations? Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 23, 596–601 (2015).
pubmed: 25074460 doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.145
Louvrier, C. et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing for differential diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2, schwannomatosis, and meningiomatosis. Neuro. Oncol. 20, 917–929 (2018).
pubmed: 29409008 pmcid: 6007397 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy009
Imbard, A. et al. NF1 single and multi-exons copy number variations in neurofibromatosis type 1. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 221–224 (2015).
pubmed: 25631097 doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.6
Pasmant, E. et al. Characterization of a 7.6-Mb germline deletion encompassing the NF1 locus and about a hundred genes in an NF1 contiguous gene syndrome patient. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 16, 1459–1466 (2008).
pubmed: 18648396 doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.134

Auteurs

Laurence Pacot (L)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.

Dominique Vidaud (D)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.

Manuela Ye (M)

Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.

Albain Chansavang (A)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.

Audrey Coustier (A)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Theodora Maillard (T)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Cécile Barbance (C)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Ingrid Laurendeau (I)

Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.

Bérénice Hébrard (B)

Department of Genetics, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.

Ariane Lunati-Rozie (A)

Department of Genetics, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.

Benoît Funalot (B)

Department of Genetics, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.

Pierre Wolkenstein (P)

Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpital Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.
INSERM, Clinical Investigation Center 1430, Referral Center of Neurofibromatosis, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Faculté de Santé Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.

Michel Vidaud (M)

Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.
LBMM SeqOIA, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Alice Goldenberg (A)

Department of Genetics and Reference Center for Developmental Disorders, Inserm U1245 and CHU Rouen, Université de Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.

Fanny Morice-Picard (F)

Pediatric Dermatology Unit, National Center for Rare Skin Disorders, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Djihad Hadjadj (D)

Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.

Béatrice Parfait (B)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France.

Eric Pasmant (E)

AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, DMU BioPhyGen, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France. eric.pasmant@inserm.fr.
Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Cité, CARPEM, Paris, France. eric.pasmant@inserm.fr.

Classifications MeSH