Evaluation of helical tomotherapy as an alternative for left-sided breast cancer patients not compliant with deep inspiration breath hold.
Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold
Free Breathing
Helical Tomotherapy
Left-Sided Breast-only Radiotherapy
VMAT
Journal
Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2405-6324
Titre abrégé: Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101762366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
11
04
2024
revised:
31
07
2024
accepted:
03
08
2024
medline:
9
9
2024
pubmed:
9
9
2024
entrez:
9
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study is to investigate, from a dosimetric perspective, whether helical Tomotherapy (HT) during free breathing (FB) can serve as an alternative technique for treating left-sided breast cancer patients who are unable to comply with the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique. For this purpose, the CT images of 20 left breast-only cancer patients acquired in both FB and DIBH phases were utilized. The left breast was contoured as the target volume, while the heart, LAD, ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, and contralateral breast were contoured as organs at risk on the CT images obtained in both DIBH and FB. Planning with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique was performed on the CT scans obtained in the DIBH (VMAT-DIBH), while planning with the HT technique was carried out on the CT scans obtained in the FB (HT-FB). Subsequently, dosimetric comparison of the plans were done in terms of target coverage and preservation of normal tissues. Both techniques achieved the desired target coverage; however, in terms of D2, Vpres values, Conformity Number (CN), and Homogeneity Index (HI), the HT-FB technique was found to be superior. While the mean doses to the heart were similar for both techniques, doses to the LAD and left lung were found to be superior in plans generated with the HT-FB technique. When compared in terms of contralateral breast and right lung protection, VMAT-DIBH technique was found to be significantly superior. The treatment of left breast-only patients with the HT-FB technique has been observed to provide similar heart protection and better LAD and ipsilateral lung protection compared to the VMAT-DIBH technique without compromising target coverage. However, when the HT-FB technique is used, doses to the contralateral lung and contralateral breast should be carefully evaluated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39247163
doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100268
pii: S2405-6324(24)00035-0
pmc: PMC11380380
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100268Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.