Muscle Advancement During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as a Treatment Option for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.
irreparable
muscle advancement
rotator cuff repair
rotator cuff tear
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
08
02
2024
accepted:
13
02
2024
medline:
9
9
2024
pubmed:
9
9
2024
entrez:
9
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears presents a surgical dilemma. However, supraspinatus muscle advancement (MA) could be used to convert irreparable to reparable tears without requiring a graft. To compare the outcomes of patients with an irreparable tear who underwent rotator cuff repair with MA with those with a reparable large to massive cuff tear who underwent rotator cuff repair. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. We enrolled 62 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for a large to massive tear between January 2020 and May 2022. Among them, 29 patients underwent an MA procedure due to an inability to repair despite releases (MA group), whereas the other 33 patients did not require the procedure (NMA group). At 1 year postoperatively, follow-up assessments including magnetic resonance imaging were performed to evaluate group outcomes. Despite there being more revision surgery cases and a poorer potential for cuff healing in the MA group, the retear rates in the MA and NMA groups were similar (31.0% vs 21.2%, respectively; The MA procedure for irreparable tears produced outcomes comparable with reparable tears, offering a valuable perspective on the efficiency of the procedure. The comparable but relatively high retear rates emphasize the need for further studies to compare with other treatment options for irreparable tears.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears presents a surgical dilemma. However, supraspinatus muscle advancement (MA) could be used to convert irreparable to reparable tears without requiring a graft.
Purpose
UNASSIGNED
To compare the outcomes of patients with an irreparable tear who underwent rotator cuff repair with MA with those with a reparable large to massive cuff tear who underwent rotator cuff repair.
Study Design
UNASSIGNED
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We enrolled 62 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for a large to massive tear between January 2020 and May 2022. Among them, 29 patients underwent an MA procedure due to an inability to repair despite releases (MA group), whereas the other 33 patients did not require the procedure (NMA group). At 1 year postoperatively, follow-up assessments including magnetic resonance imaging were performed to evaluate group outcomes.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Despite there being more revision surgery cases and a poorer potential for cuff healing in the MA group, the retear rates in the MA and NMA groups were similar (31.0% vs 21.2%, respectively;
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The MA procedure for irreparable tears produced outcomes comparable with reparable tears, offering a valuable perspective on the efficiency of the procedure. The comparable but relatively high retear rates emphasize the need for further studies to compare with other treatment options for irreparable tears.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39247525
doi: 10.1177/23259671241266050
pii: 10.1177_23259671241266050
pmc: PMC11375638
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671241266050Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital (ref No. H-2306-102-1438).