Muscle Advancement During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as a Treatment Option for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

irreparable muscle advancement rotator cuff repair rotator cuff tear

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 08 02 2024
accepted: 13 02 2024
medline: 9 9 2024
pubmed: 9 9 2024
entrez: 9 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears presents a surgical dilemma. However, supraspinatus muscle advancement (MA) could be used to convert irreparable to reparable tears without requiring a graft. To compare the outcomes of patients with an irreparable tear who underwent rotator cuff repair with MA with those with a reparable large to massive cuff tear who underwent rotator cuff repair. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. We enrolled 62 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for a large to massive tear between January 2020 and May 2022. Among them, 29 patients underwent an MA procedure due to an inability to repair despite releases (MA group), whereas the other 33 patients did not require the procedure (NMA group). At 1 year postoperatively, follow-up assessments including magnetic resonance imaging were performed to evaluate group outcomes. Despite there being more revision surgery cases and a poorer potential for cuff healing in the MA group, the retear rates in the MA and NMA groups were similar (31.0% vs 21.2%, respectively; The MA procedure for irreparable tears produced outcomes comparable with reparable tears, offering a valuable perspective on the efficiency of the procedure. The comparable but relatively high retear rates emphasize the need for further studies to compare with other treatment options for irreparable tears.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears presents a surgical dilemma. However, supraspinatus muscle advancement (MA) could be used to convert irreparable to reparable tears without requiring a graft.
Purpose UNASSIGNED
To compare the outcomes of patients with an irreparable tear who underwent rotator cuff repair with MA with those with a reparable large to massive cuff tear who underwent rotator cuff repair.
Study Design UNASSIGNED
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We enrolled 62 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for a large to massive tear between January 2020 and May 2022. Among them, 29 patients underwent an MA procedure due to an inability to repair despite releases (MA group), whereas the other 33 patients did not require the procedure (NMA group). At 1 year postoperatively, follow-up assessments including magnetic resonance imaging were performed to evaluate group outcomes.
Results UNASSIGNED
Despite there being more revision surgery cases and a poorer potential for cuff healing in the MA group, the retear rates in the MA and NMA groups were similar (31.0% vs 21.2%, respectively;
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The MA procedure for irreparable tears produced outcomes comparable with reparable tears, offering a valuable perspective on the efficiency of the procedure. The comparable but relatively high retear rates emphasize the need for further studies to compare with other treatment options for irreparable tears.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39247525
doi: 10.1177/23259671241266050
pii: 10.1177_23259671241266050
pmc: PMC11375638
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

23259671241266050

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital (ref No. H-2306-102-1438).

Auteurs

Sang Yun Oh (SY)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Yong Tae Kim (YT)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.

Kyung Jae Lee (KJ)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Sae Hoon Kim (SH)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Classifications MeSH