Resistant Hypertension and Mortality: An Observational Cohort Study.

blood pressure blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory hypertension mortality population

Journal

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)
ISSN: 1524-4563
Titre abrégé: Hypertension
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7906255

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 9 2024
pubmed: 9 9 2024
entrez: 9 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Resistant hypertension is characterized by elevated blood pressure (BP) despite using 3 antihypertensive agents. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) detects the presence of white-coat resistant hypertension (24-hour BP <130/80 mm Hg). The aim of the study was to evaluate risks of death in resistant hypertension compared with controlled hypertension, as well as in ABPM-confirmed (24-hour BP ≥130 or 80 mm Hg), versus white-coat resistant hypertension. We selected 8146 patients with controlled hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg while being treated with ≤3 antihypertensive drugs) and 8577 with resistant hypertension (BP ≥140 or ≥90 mm Hg while being treated with ≥3 drugs). All-cause and cardiovascular mortalities (median follow-up, 9.7 years) were compared between groups, as well as between patients with white-coat (3289) and ABPM-confirmed (5288) resistant hypertension. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox models after adjustment for clinical confounders were used for comparisons. Compared with controlled hypertension, resistant hypertension was associated with an increased risk in all-cause (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.12-1.30]) and cardiovascular mortalities (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.17-1.51]) in confounder-adjusted models. Compared with white-coat, ABPM-confirmed resistant hypertension was associated with an increased risk of all-cause (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.32-1.60]) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.98]) mortalities. When ABPM-confirmed and white-coat resistant hypertension were separately compared with controlled hypertension, only the former was associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular death (HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.26-1.48] and 1.56 [95% CI, 1.36-1.79]), respectively. ABPM-confirmed resistant hypertension is associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular death with respect to both controlled hypertension and white-coat resistant hypertension.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Resistant hypertension is characterized by elevated blood pressure (BP) despite using 3 antihypertensive agents. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) detects the presence of white-coat resistant hypertension (24-hour BP <130/80 mm Hg). The aim of the study was to evaluate risks of death in resistant hypertension compared with controlled hypertension, as well as in ABPM-confirmed (24-hour BP ≥130 or 80 mm Hg), versus white-coat resistant hypertension.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
We selected 8146 patients with controlled hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg while being treated with ≤3 antihypertensive drugs) and 8577 with resistant hypertension (BP ≥140 or ≥90 mm Hg while being treated with ≥3 drugs). All-cause and cardiovascular mortalities (median follow-up, 9.7 years) were compared between groups, as well as between patients with white-coat (3289) and ABPM-confirmed (5288) resistant hypertension. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox models after adjustment for clinical confounders were used for comparisons.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Compared with controlled hypertension, resistant hypertension was associated with an increased risk in all-cause (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.12-1.30]) and cardiovascular mortalities (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.17-1.51]) in confounder-adjusted models. Compared with white-coat, ABPM-confirmed resistant hypertension was associated with an increased risk of all-cause (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.32-1.60]) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.98]) mortalities. When ABPM-confirmed and white-coat resistant hypertension were separately compared with controlled hypertension, only the former was associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular death (HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.26-1.48] and 1.56 [95% CI, 1.36-1.79]), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
ABPM-confirmed resistant hypertension is associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular death with respect to both controlled hypertension and white-coat resistant hypertension.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39247961
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23276
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Alejandro de la Sierra (A)

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain (A.d.l.S.).

Luis M Ruilope (LM)

Hypertension Unit and Cardiorenal Translational Laboratory, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain (L.M.R., J.S.).

Natalie Staplin (N)

Nuffield Department of Population Health, Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (N.S.).

Manuel Gorostidi (M)

Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain (M.G.).

Ernest Vinyoles (E)

Primary Care Centre La Mina, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, University of Barcelona, Spain (E.V.).

Julián Segura (J)

Hypertension Unit and Cardiorenal Translational Laboratory, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain (L.M.R., J.S.).

Pedro Armario (P)

Cardiovascular Risk Area, Hospital Moisés Broggi, University of Barcelona, Sant Joan Despí, Spain (P.A.).

Anna Oliveras (A)

Department of Nephrology, Hypertension Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain (A.O.).

Bryan Williams (B)

University College London (UCL) Institute of Cardiovascular Science and National Institute for Health Research, UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom (B.W.).

Classifications MeSH