FDA Approval Summary: Belzutifan for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.


Journal

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
accepted: 19 08 2024
received: 19 04 2024
revised: 28 06 2024
medline: 9 9 2024
pubmed: 9 9 2024
entrez: 9 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

On December 14, 2023, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following a programmed death receptor-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF-TKI). FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF-TKI. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.90); 1-sided p-value=0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected non-proportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9, 7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.8, 5.8) in the everolimus arm. While not reaching full maturity, OS results appeared to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared to everolimus [HR=0.88 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.07)]. The confirmed objective response rate by BICR was 22% and 3.6% in belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower on the belzutifan arm compared to the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared to everolimus.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39248780
pii: 748378
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Jaleh Fallah (J)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Brian L Heiss (BL)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.

Hee-Koung Joeng (HK)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Chana Weinstock (C)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Xin Gao (X)

Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, United States.

William F Pierce (WF)

Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.

Benjamin Chukwurah (B)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Vishal Bhatnagar (V)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Mallorie H Fiero (MH)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Laleh Amiri-Kordestani (L)

Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, United States.

Richard Pazdur (R)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Paul G Kluetz (PG)

Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Daniel L Suzman (DL)

United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Classifications MeSH