Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia.
EEG bicoherence
Electroencephalogram
Fentanyl
General anesthesia
Intraoperative monitoring
Nociception
Opioids
Journal
Journal of anesthesia
ISSN: 1438-8359
Titre abrégé: J Anesth
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8905667
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
06
05
2024
accepted:
28
08
2024
medline:
9
9
2024
pubmed:
9
9
2024
entrez:
9
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Studies show that the two peak heights of electroencephalographic bicoherence (pBIC-high, pBIC-low) decrease after incision and are restored by fentanyl administration. We investigated whether pBICs are good indicators for adequacy of analgesia during surgery. After local ethical committee approval, we enrolled 50 patients (27-65 years, ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled elective surgery. Besides standard anesthesia monitors, to assess pBICs, we used a BIS monitor and freeware Bispectrum Analyzer for A2000. Fentanyl 5 µg/kg was completely administered before incision, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. After skin incision, when the peak of pBIC-high or pBIC-low decreased by 10% in absolute value (named LT10-high and LT10-low groups in order) or when either peak decreased to below 20% (BL20-high and BL20-low groups), an additional 1 g/kg of fentanyl was administered to examine its effect on the peak that showed a decrease. The mean values and standard deviation for pBIC-high 5 min before fentanyl administration, at the time of fentanyl administration, and 5 min after fentanyl administration for LT10-high group were 39.8% (10.9%), 26.9% (10.5%), and 35.7% (12.5%). And those for pBIC-low for LT10-low group were 39.5% (6.0%), 26.8% (6.4%) and 35.0% (7.0%). Those for pBIC-high for BL20-high group were 26.3% (5.6%), 16.5% (2.6%), and 25.7% (7.0%). And those for pBIC-low for BL20-low group were 26.7% (4.8%), 17.4% (1.8%) and 26.9% (5.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, at these trigger points, hemodynamic parameters didn't show significant changes. Superior to standard anesthesia monitoring, pBICs are better indicators of analgesia during surgery. Clinical trial Number and registry URL: UMIN ID: UMIN000042843 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno = R000048907.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Studies show that the two peak heights of electroencephalographic bicoherence (pBIC-high, pBIC-low) decrease after incision and are restored by fentanyl administration. We investigated whether pBICs are good indicators for adequacy of analgesia during surgery.
METHODS
METHODS
After local ethical committee approval, we enrolled 50 patients (27-65 years, ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled elective surgery. Besides standard anesthesia monitors, to assess pBICs, we used a BIS monitor and freeware Bispectrum Analyzer for A2000. Fentanyl 5 µg/kg was completely administered before incision, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. After skin incision, when the peak of pBIC-high or pBIC-low decreased by 10% in absolute value (named LT10-high and LT10-low groups in order) or when either peak decreased to below 20% (BL20-high and BL20-low groups), an additional 1 g/kg of fentanyl was administered to examine its effect on the peak that showed a decrease.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean values and standard deviation for pBIC-high 5 min before fentanyl administration, at the time of fentanyl administration, and 5 min after fentanyl administration for LT10-high group were 39.8% (10.9%), 26.9% (10.5%), and 35.7% (12.5%). And those for pBIC-low for LT10-low group were 39.5% (6.0%), 26.8% (6.4%) and 35.0% (7.0%). Those for pBIC-high for BL20-high group were 26.3% (5.6%), 16.5% (2.6%), and 25.7% (7.0%). And those for pBIC-low for BL20-low group were 26.7% (4.8%), 17.4% (1.8%) and 26.9% (5.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, at these trigger points, hemodynamic parameters didn't show significant changes.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Superior to standard anesthesia monitoring, pBICs are better indicators of analgesia during surgery.
TRIAL REGISTRY
BACKGROUND
Clinical trial Number and registry URL: UMIN ID: UMIN000042843 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno = R000048907.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39249492
doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03406-5
pii: 10.1007/s00540-024-03406-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
ID : JSPS #20K09257
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.
Références
Laferrière-Langlois P, Morisson L, Jeffries S, Duclos C, Espitalier F, Richebe P. Depth of anesthesia and nociception monitoring: current state and vision for 2050. Anesth Analg. 2024;138:295–307.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006860
pubmed: 38215709
Garcia PS, Kreuzer M, Hight D, Sleigh JW. Effects of noxious stimulation on electroencephalogram during general anesthesia: a narrative review and approach to analgesic titration. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126:445–57.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.036
pubmed: 33461725
Hagihira S, Takashina M, Mori T, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Changes of electroencephalographic bicoherence during isoflurane anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1409–15.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00012
pubmed: 12459666
Hagihira S, Takashina M, Mori T, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Practical issues in bispectral analysis of electroencephalographic signals. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:966–70.
doi: 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00032
pubmed: 11574365
Hagihira S, Takashina M, Mori T, Ueyama H, Mashimo T. Electroencephalographic bicoherence is sensitive to noxious stimuli during isoflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:818–25.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200404000-00011
pubmed: 15087616
Shafer SL, Varvel JR. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:53–63.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00010
pubmed: 1824743
Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.
doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
pubmed: 23208313
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biosciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
pubmed: 17695343
Steriade M, Contreras D, Dossi RC, Nuñez A. The slow (<1 Hz) oscillation in reticular thalamic and thalamocortical neurons: Scenario of sleep rhythm generation in interacting thalamic and neocortical networks. J Neurosci. 1993;13:3284–99.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-08-03284.1993
pubmed: 8340808
pmcid: 6576531
Nuñez A, Dossi CC, Contreras D, Steriade M. Intracellular evidence for incompatibility between spindle and delta oscillations in thalamocortical neurons of cat. Neuroscience. 1992;48:75–85.
doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90339-4
pubmed: 1584427
Hight DF, Gaskell AL, Kreuzer M, Voss LJ, Garcia PS, Sleigh JW. Transient electroencephalographic alpha power loss during maintenance of general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:635–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.029
pubmed: 30915994
Hight D, Voss LJ, Garcia PS, Sleigh J. Changes in alpha frequency and power of the electroencephalogram during volatile-based general anesthesia. Front Syst Neurosci. 2017;11:36.
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00036
pubmed: 28611600
pmcid: 5446988
Purdon PL, Pavone KJ, Akeju O, Smith AC, Sampson AL, Lee J, Zhou DW, Solt K, Brown EN. The aging brain: Age-dependent changes in the electroencephalogram during propofol and sevoflurane general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(Suppl 1):46–57.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aev213
Susano MJ, Vide S, Ferreira AD, Amorim P. Effects of varying remifentanil concentrations on Analgesia Nociception Index(R) under propofol: an observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35:199–205.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00457-3
pubmed: 31916221
Wang R, Deng Y, Zhou S, Zhang J. EEG-derived pain threshold index for prediction of postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic urological surgery: a comparison with surgical pleth index. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35:1395–402.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00604-w
pubmed: 33044610
Funcke S, Sauerlaender S, Pinnschmidt HO, Saugel B, Bermer K, Reuter DA, Nitzschke R. Validation of innovative techniques for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia: a clinical study using tetanic and intracutaneous electrical stimulation. Anesthesiology. 2017;127:272–83.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001670
pubmed: 28489614
Vide S, Castro A, Lima D, Larson M, Gambús P, Amorim P. Pharmacodymanic modelling of the effect of remifentanil using the pupillary pain Index. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34:319–24.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00323-x
pubmed: 31119519
Jensen EW, Valencia JF, López A, Anglada T, Agustí M, Ramos Y, Serra R, Jospin M, Pineda P, Gambus P. Monitoring hypnotic effect and nociception with two EEG-derived indices, qCON and qNOX, during general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:933–41.
doi: 10.1111/aas.12359
pubmed: 24995461
Wu L, Wnag S, Wnag Y, Zhang K, Bai J, Zheng J. Prediction of hemodynamic reactivity by electrohncephalographically derived pain threshold index in children undergoing general anesthesia: a prospective observational study. J Pain Res. 2019;12:3245–55.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S231596
pubmed: 31819608
pmcid: 6899069