Changes in the plasma protein-binding rate of remifentanil during cardiopulmonary bypass.

cardiopulmonary bypass equilibrium dialysis protein‐binding rate remifentanil unbound fraction

Journal

British journal of clinical pharmacology
ISSN: 1365-2125
Titre abrégé: Br J Clin Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503323

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
revised: 07 08 2024
received: 31 05 2024
accepted: 22 08 2024
medline: 10 9 2024
pubmed: 10 9 2024
entrez: 10 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) reduces the plasma protein-binding rate of some anaesthetics and can enhance their pharmacological effects by increasing the unbound drug fraction. However, whether these changes occur with remifentanil remains to be explored. We investigated the changes in the protein-binding rate of remifentanil during CPB compared with propofol. Thirteen patients (≥18 years old) who were scheduled to undergo cardiovascular surgery with CPB were included. Arterial blood samples were collected to measure the plasma concentrations of remifentanil and propofol before CPB (T1), 30 (T2) and 60 (T3) minutes after the start of CPB, and 30 min after CPB discontinuation (T4). The samples were immediately centrifuged to separate the plasma after blood collection. Equilibrium dialysis was used to separate the unbound fraction. The remifentanil and propofol concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The protein-binding rate was calculated based on the total and unbound fraction of each drug. The remifentanil protein-binding rates at each time point were 27.9% ± 11.2% (T1), 13.5% ± 4.4% (T2), 14.0% ± 3.3% (T3) and 24.5% ± 6.9% (T4). The propofol protein-binding rates were 97.5% ± 0.7% (n = 4; T1), 95.8% ± 1.4% (T2), 95.3% ± 1.3% (T3) and 95.8% ± 1.1% (T4). The protein binding rates of both drugs decreased during CPB and reversed after CPB. The change in the unbound fraction was 1.2-fold for remifentanil and 1.7-1.9-fold for propofol. Unlike propofol, remifentanil might not demonstrate significantly enhanced pharmacological effects during CPB.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39252534
doi: 10.1111/bcp.16245
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : JSPS KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists)
ID : JP16K20090
Organisme : JSPS KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists)
ID : JP18K16476

Informations de copyright

© 2024 British Pharmacological Society.

Références

Kirkpatrick T, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ, Nimmo WS. Pharmacokinetics of propofol (diprivan) in elderly patients. Br J Anaesth. 1988;60(2):146‐150. doi:10.1093/bja/60.2.146
Hiraoka H, Yamamoto K, Okano N. Changes in drug plasma concentrations of an extensively bound and highly extracted drug, propofol, in response to altered plasma binding. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75(4):324‐330. doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2003.12.004
Jeleazcov C, Saari TI, Ihmsen H. Changes in total and unbound concentrations of sufentanil during target controlled infusion for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):698‐706. doi:10.1093/bja/aes253
Medical package insert for Ultiva® (written in Japanese).
Kurita T, Uraoka M, Morita K, Suzuki M, Morishima Y, Sato S. Influence of haemorrhage on the pseudo‐steady‐state remifentanil concentration in a swine model: a comparison with propofol and the effect of haemorrhagic shock stage. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(5):719‐725. doi:10.1093/bja/aer233
Kurita T, Uraoka M, Jiang Q, et al. Influence of cardiac output on the pseudo‐steady state remifentanil and propofol concentrations in swine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(6):754‐760. doi:10.1111/aas.12076
Miller RS, Peterson GM, McLean S, Möller C. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on the plasma concentrations of fentanyl and alcuronium. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1997;22(3):197‐205. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2710.1997.94875948.x
Hynynen M, Hynninen M, Soini H, Neuvonen PJ, Heinonen J. Plasma concentration and protein binding of alfentanil during high‐dose infusion for cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1994;72(5):571‐576. doi:10.1093/bja/72.5.571
Egan TD, Lemmens HJ, Fiset P, et al. The pharmacokinetics of the new short‐acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993;79(5):881‐892. doi:10.1097/00000542‐199311000‐00004
Egan TD, Minto CF, Hermann DJ, Barr J, Muir KT, Shafer SL. Remifentanil versus alfentanil: comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(4):821‐833. doi:10.1097/00000542‐199604000‐00009
Glass PS, Hardman D, Kamiyama Y, et al. Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra‐short‐acting opioid: remifentanil (GI87084B). Anesth Analg. 1993;77(5):1031‐1040. doi:10.1213/00000539‐199311000‐00028
Davis PJ, Stiller RL, Wilson AS, McGowan FX, Egan TD, Muir KT. In vitro remifentanil metabolism: the effects of whole blood constituents and plasma butyrylcholinesterase. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(5):1305‐1307. doi:10.1097/00000539‐200211000‐00038

Auteurs

Hiroshi Ueda (H)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Tadayoshi Kurita (T)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Shingo Kawashima (S)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Takuya Kitamoto (T)

Advanced Research Facilities and Services, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Masako Suzuki (M)

Advanced Research Facilities and Services, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Yoshiki Nakajima (Y)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Classifications MeSH