Brain state-dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor stroke rehabilitation: a proof of concept randomized controlled trial.

brain state-dependent stimulation motor stroke rehabilitation rTMS sensorimotor μ-oscillation spasticity

Journal

Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 03 05 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 10 9 2024
pubmed: 10 9 2024
entrez: 10 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In healthy subjects, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) demonstrated plasticity effects contingent on electroencephalography (EEG)-derived excitability states, defined by the phase of the ongoing sensorimotor μ-oscillation. The therapeutic potential of brain state-dependent rTMS in the rehabilitation of upper limb motor impairment post-stroke remains unexplored. Proof-of-concept trial to assess the efficacy of rTMS, synchronized to the sensorimotor μ-oscillation, in improving motor impairment and reducing upper-limb spasticity in stroke patients. We conducted a parallel group, randomized double-blind controlled trial in 30 chronic stroke patients (clinical trial registration number: NCT05005780). The experimental intervention group received EEG-triggered rTMS of the ipsilesional M1 [1,200 pulses; 0.33 Hz; 100% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)], while the control group received low-frequency rTMS of the contralesional motor cortex (1,200 pulses; 1 Hz, 115% RMT), i.e., an established treatment protocol. Both groups received 12 rTMS sessions (20 min, 3× per week, 4 weeks) followed by 50 min of physiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the change in upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-UE) scores between baseline, immediately post-treatment and 3 months' follow-up. Both groups showed significant improvement in the primary outcome measure (FMA-UE) and the secondary outcome measures. This included the reduction in spasticity, measured objectively using the hand-held dynamometer, and enhanced motor function as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the outcome measures. The application of brain state-dependent rTMS for rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients is feasible. This pilot study demonstrated that the brain oscillation-synchronized rTMS protocol produced beneficial effects on motor impairment, motor function and spasticity that were comparable to those observed with an established therapeutic rTMS protocol. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT05005780].

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
In healthy subjects, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) demonstrated plasticity effects contingent on electroencephalography (EEG)-derived excitability states, defined by the phase of the ongoing sensorimotor μ-oscillation. The therapeutic potential of brain state-dependent rTMS in the rehabilitation of upper limb motor impairment post-stroke remains unexplored.
Objective UNASSIGNED
Proof-of-concept trial to assess the efficacy of rTMS, synchronized to the sensorimotor μ-oscillation, in improving motor impairment and reducing upper-limb spasticity in stroke patients.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted a parallel group, randomized double-blind controlled trial in 30 chronic stroke patients (clinical trial registration number: NCT05005780). The experimental intervention group received EEG-triggered rTMS of the ipsilesional M1 [1,200 pulses; 0.33 Hz; 100% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)], while the control group received low-frequency rTMS of the contralesional motor cortex (1,200 pulses; 1 Hz, 115% RMT), i.e., an established treatment protocol. Both groups received 12 rTMS sessions (20 min, 3× per week, 4 weeks) followed by 50 min of physiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the change in upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-UE) scores between baseline, immediately post-treatment and 3 months' follow-up.
Results UNASSIGNED
Both groups showed significant improvement in the primary outcome measure (FMA-UE) and the secondary outcome measures. This included the reduction in spasticity, measured objectively using the hand-held dynamometer, and enhanced motor function as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the outcome measures.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The application of brain state-dependent rTMS for rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients is feasible. This pilot study demonstrated that the brain oscillation-synchronized rTMS protocol produced beneficial effects on motor impairment, motor function and spasticity that were comparable to those observed with an established therapeutic rTMS protocol.
Clinical Trial Registration UNASSIGNED
ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT05005780].

Identifiants

pubmed: 39253360
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1427198
pmc: PMC11381265
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05005780']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1427198

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Mahmoud, Baur, Zrenner, Brancaccio, Belardinelli, Ramos-Murguialday, Zrenner and Ziemann.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

CZ and BZ own shares in sync2brain GmbH (Tübingen, Germany), a spin-off start-up company that commercializes the real-time EEG analysis technology used in this study to synchronize TMS stimulation with the phase of brain oscillations. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Wala Mahmoud (W)

Institute for Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

David Baur (D)

Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Brigitte Zrenner (B)

Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Arianna Brancaccio (A)

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Paolo Belardinelli (P)

Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Ander Ramos-Murguialday (A)

Institute for Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Tecnalia, Basque Research and Technology Alliance, San Sebastián, Spain.
Athenea Neuroclinics, San Sebastián, Spain.

Christoph Zrenner (C)

Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Ulf Ziemann (U)

Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH