Lifetime effects and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for older people in the United Kingdom: a modelling study.

Cardiovascular Diseases Computer Simulation Health Care Economics and Organizations Outcome Assessment, Health Care

Journal

Heart (British Cardiac Society)
ISSN: 1468-201X
Titre abrégé: Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9602087

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 19 02 2024
accepted: 23 07 2024
medline: 11 9 2024
pubmed: 11 9 2024
entrez: 10 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk increases with age. Statins reduce cardiovascular risk but their effects are less certain at older ages. We assessed the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for older people in the contemporary UK population using a recent meta-analysis of randomised evidence of statin effects in older people and a new validated CVD model. The performance of the CVD microsimulation model, developed using the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (CTTC) and UK Biobank cohort, was assessed among participants ≥70 years old at (re)surveys in UK Biobank and the Whitehall II studies. The model projected participants' cardiovascular risks, survival, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and healthcare costs (2021 UK£) with and without lifetime standard (35%-45% low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction) or higher intensity (≥45% reduction) statin therapy. CTTC individual participant data and other meta-analyses informed statins' effects on cardiovascular risks, incident diabetes, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Sensitivity of findings to smaller CVD risk reductions and to hypothetical further adverse effects with statins were assessed. In categories of men and women ≥70 years old without (15,019) and with (5,103) prior CVD, lifetime use of a standard statin increased QALYs by 0.24-0.70 and a higher intensity statin by a further 0.04-0.13 QALYs per person. Statin therapies were cost-effective with an incremental cost per QALY gained below £3502/QALY for standard and below £11778/QALY for higher intensity therapy and with high probability of being cost-effective. In sensitivity analyses, statins remained cost-effective although with larger uncertainty in cost-effectiveness among older people without prior CVD. Based on current evidence for the effects of statin therapy and modelling analysis, statin therapy improved health outcomes cost-effectively for men and women ≥70 years old.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk increases with age. Statins reduce cardiovascular risk but their effects are less certain at older ages. We assessed the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for older people in the contemporary UK population using a recent meta-analysis of randomised evidence of statin effects in older people and a new validated CVD model.
METHODS METHODS
The performance of the CVD microsimulation model, developed using the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (CTTC) and UK Biobank cohort, was assessed among participants ≥70 years old at (re)surveys in UK Biobank and the Whitehall II studies. The model projected participants' cardiovascular risks, survival, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and healthcare costs (2021 UK£) with and without lifetime standard (35%-45% low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction) or higher intensity (≥45% reduction) statin therapy. CTTC individual participant data and other meta-analyses informed statins' effects on cardiovascular risks, incident diabetes, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Sensitivity of findings to smaller CVD risk reductions and to hypothetical further adverse effects with statins were assessed.
RESULTS RESULTS
In categories of men and women ≥70 years old without (15,019) and with (5,103) prior CVD, lifetime use of a standard statin increased QALYs by 0.24-0.70 and a higher intensity statin by a further 0.04-0.13 QALYs per person. Statin therapies were cost-effective with an incremental cost per QALY gained below £3502/QALY for standard and below £11778/QALY for higher intensity therapy and with high probability of being cost-effective. In sensitivity analyses, statins remained cost-effective although with larger uncertainty in cost-effectiveness among older people without prior CVD.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Based on current evidence for the effects of statin therapy and modelling analysis, statin therapy improved health outcomes cost-effectively for men and women ≥70 years old.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39256053
pii: heartjnl-2024-324052
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324052
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: AK reports research support from Abbott, Amgen, ASPEN, Bayer, Mylan, Novartis, Sanofi, Viatris; speaker fees from Novartis; and is a Data Safety Monitoring Board member for Kowa. JR reports funding from North East London Integrated Care Service. JA reports receiving a grant to their research institution from Novartis for the ORION 4 trial of inclisiran. JS reports receiving grants for his institution from Amgen, Bayer, BMS, MSD, Pfizer and Roche; consulting fees from FivepHusion, and is a chair (unpaid) of STAREE DSMB. CB reports research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Health Data Research UK and is a chair (unpaid) of a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Merck. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Borislava Mihaylova (B)

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK boby.mihaylova@dph.ox.ac.uk.
Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Runguo Wu (R)

Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Junwen Zhou (J)

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Claire Williams (C)

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Iryna Schlackow (I)

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Jonathan Emberson (J)

Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Christina Reith (C)

Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Anthony Keech (A)

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

John Robson (J)

Clinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Richard Parnell (R)

Patient and Public Representative, Havant, UK.

Jane Armitage (J)

Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Alastair Gray (A)

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

John Simes (J)

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Colin Baigent (C)

Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Classifications MeSH