Relationship power attenuated the effects of gratitude on perceived partner responsiveness and satisfaction in romantic relationships.
Gratitude
Perceived partner responsiveness
Relationship power
Relationship satisfaction
Romantic relationships
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Sep 2024
10 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
16
02
2024
accepted:
02
09
2024
medline:
11
9
2024
pubmed:
11
9
2024
entrez:
10
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a gap in whether relationship power affects the association between gratitude and relationship satisfaction in romantic relationships. Based on the relationship maintenance model and the social distance theory of power, the present study adopted a digital questionnaire design on an online platform to test the mediating role of perceived partner responsiveness between gratitude and satisfaction as well as the moderating role of relationship power. A total of 825 subjects (M
Identifiants
pubmed: 39256415
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71994-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-71994-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21090Subventions
Organisme : the scientific and technological innovation 2030 - the major project of the Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence Technology
ID : 2021ZD0200500
Organisme : the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Science of Anhui Province on Adolescent Mental Health and Crisis Intelligence Intervention
ID : SYS2024XXX
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B. & Layton, J. B. Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 (2010).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
pubmed: 20668659
pmcid: 2910600
Whisman, M. A. & Baucom, D. H. Intimate relationships and psychopathology. Clin. Child. Fam. Psychol. Rev. 15(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-011-0107-2 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s10567-011-0107-2
pubmed: 22124792
Smith, T. W. & Baucom, B. R. W. Intimate relationships, individual adjustment, and coronary heart disease: Implications of overlapping associations in psychosocial risk. Am. Psychol. 72(6), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000123 (2017).
doi: 10.1037/amp0000123
pubmed: 28880104
Adamczyk, K., Barr, A. B. & Segrin, C. Relationship status and mental and physical health among Polish and American young adults: The role of relationship satisfaction and satisfaction with relationship status. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 13(3), 620–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12248 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/aphw.12248
pubmed: 33595205
Barton, A. W., Jenkins, A. I. C., Gong, Q., Sutton, N. C. & Beach, S. R. The protective effects of perceived gratitude and expressed gratitude for relationship quality among African American couples. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 40(5), 1622–1644 (2023).
doi: 10.1177/02654075221131288
pubmed: 38911018
Körner, R. & Schütz, A. Power in romantic relationships: How positional and experienced power are associated with relationship quality. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 38(9), 2653–2677 (2021).
doi: 10.1177/02654075211017670
Candel, O. S. & Turliuc, M. N. The role of relational entitlement, self-disclosure and perceived partner responsiveness in predicting couple satisfaction: A daily-diary study. Front. Psychol. 12, 609232 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609232
pubmed: 33833709
pmcid: 8022838
Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J. & Geraghty, A. W. Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30(7), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005
pubmed: 20451313
Datu, J. A. D., Valdez, J. P. M., McInerney, D. M. & Cayubit, R. F. The effects of gratitude and kindness on life satisfaction, positive emotions, negative emotions, and COVID-19 anxiety: An online pilot experimental study. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 14(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12306 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/aphw.12306
pubmed: 34668323
Jiang, D. Feeling gratitude is associated with better well-being across the life span: A daily diary study during the COVID-19 outbreak. J. Gerontol. 77(4), e36–e45. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa220 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa220
Algoe, S. B., Fredrickson, B. L. & Gable, S. L. The social functions of the emotion of gratitude via expression. Emotion 13(4), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032701 (2013).
doi: 10.1037/a0032701
pubmed: 23731434
Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Oveis, C. & Keltner, D. To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 103(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028723 (2012).
doi: 10.1037/a0028723
Fredrickson, B. L. Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. The Psychology of Gratitude (Vol.8, pp.145–166). New York: Oxford University Press (2004).
Leong, J. L. T. et al. Is gratitude always beneficial to interpersonal relationships? The interplay of grateful disposition, grateful mood, and grateful expression among married couples. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219842868 (2020).
doi: 10.1177/0146167219842868
Chang, Y. P., Dwyer, P. C. & Algoe, S. B. Better together: Integrative analysis of behavioral gratitude in close relationships using the three-factorial interpersonal emotions (TIE) framework. Emotion 22(8), 1739–1754. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001020 (2022).
doi: 10.1037/emo0001020
pubmed: 34793186
Funk, J. L. & Rogge, R. D. Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. J. Fam. Psychol. 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572 (2007).
doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
pubmed: 18179329
Johnson, M. D. et al. Women and men are the barometers of relationships: Testing the predictive power of women’s and men’s relationship satisfaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(33), e2209460119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209460119 (2022).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209460119
pubmed: 35939691
pmcid: 9388139
Cornelius, T., Desrosiers, A. & Kershaw, T. Spread of health behaviors in young couples: How relationship power shapes relational influence. Soc. Sci. Med. 165, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.030 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.030
pubmed: 27494239
pmcid: 5003715
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Oriña, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. Power and social influence in relationships. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal Relations (pp. 393–420) (2015). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-015
Anicich, E. M., Lee, A. J. & Liu, S. Thanks, but No thanks: Unpacking the relationship between relative power and gratitude. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 48(7), 1005–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211025945 (2022).
doi: 10.1177/01461672211025945
Sawyer, K. B. et al. Being present and thankful: A multi-study investigation of mindfulness, gratitude, and employee helping behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 107(2), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000903 (2022).
doi: 10.1037/apl0000903
pubmed: 33844565
Ksenofontov, I. & Becker, J. C. The harmful side of thanks: Thankful responses to high-power group help undermine low-power groups’ protest. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46(5), 794–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219879125 (2020).
doi: 10.1177/0146167219879125
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. The social distance theory of power. Person. Soc. Psychol. Rev. Inc 17(2), 158–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732
Reis, H. T. Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Relationships, Well-being and Behaviour 113–143 (Routledge, 2018).
doi: 10.4324/9780203732496-5
Reis, H. T. & Gable, S. L. Responsiveness. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 1, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001
Crasta, D., Rogge, R. D., Maniaci, M. R. & Reis, H. T. Toward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness: Development and validation of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale. Psychol. Assess. 33(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000986 (2021).
doi: 10.1037/pas0000986
pubmed: 33600200
Algoe, S. B. & Way, B. M. Evidence for a role of the oxytocin system, indexed by genetic variation in CD38, in the social bonding effects of expressed gratitude. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9(12), 1855–1861. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst182 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/scan/nst182
pubmed: 24396004
pmcid: 4249462
Ter Kuile, H., Kluwer, E. S., Finkenauer, C. & Van Der Lippe, T. Predicting adaptation to par enthood: The role of responsiveness, gratitude, and trust. Pers. Relatsh. 24, 663–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12202 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/pere.12202
Jolink, T. A., Chang, Y. P. & Algoe, S. B. Perceived partner responsiveness forecasts behavioral intimacy as measured by affectionate touch. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 48(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167221993349 (2022).
doi: 10.1177/0146167221993349
Kubacka, K. E., Finkenauer, C., Rusbult, C. E. & Keijsers, L. Maintaining close relationships: Gratitude as a motivator and a detector of maintenance behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37(10), 1362–1375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211412196 (2011).
doi: 10.1177/0146167211412196
Rosen, N. O. et al. Sexual intimacy in first-time mothers: Associations with sexual and relationship satisfaction across three waves. Arch. Sex. Behav. 49, 2849–2861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01667-1 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01667-1
pubmed: 32170547
Debrot, A., Cook, W. L., Perrez, M. & Horn, A. B. Deeds matter: Daily enacted responsiveness and intimacy in couples’ daily lives. J. Fam. Psychol. 26(4), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028666 (2012).
doi: 10.1037/a0028666
pubmed: 22686267
Manne, S. et al. The interpersonal process model of intimacy: The role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. J. Fam. Psychol. 18(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.589 (2004).
doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.589
pubmed: 15598164
Visserman, M. L. et al. Lightening the load: Perceived partner responsiveness fosters more positive appraisals of relational sacrifices. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 123(4), 788–810. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000384 (2022).
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000384
Khalifian, C. E. & Barry, R. A. The relation between mindfulness and perceived partner responsiveness during couples’ vulnerability discussions. J. Fam. Psychol. 35(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000666 (2021).
doi: 10.1037/fam0000666
pubmed: 32338940
Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F. & Rovine, M. J. The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. J. Fam. Psychol. 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314 (2005).
doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
pubmed: 15982109
Smallen, D., Eller, J., Rholes, W. S. & Simpson, J. A. Perceptions of partner responsiveness across the transition to parenthood. J. Fam. Psychol. 36(4), 618. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000907 (2022).
doi: 10.1037/fam0000907
pubmed: 34370505
Algoe, S. B. & Zhaoyang, R. Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness. J. Posit. Psychol. 11(4), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1117131 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1117131
pubmed: 27800009
Algoe, S. B. Find, remind, and bind The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 6(6), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.x (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.x
Williams, L. A. & Bartlett, M. Y. Warm thanks: Gratitude expression facilitates social affiliation in new relationships via perceived warmth. Emotion 15(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000017 (2015).
doi: 10.1037/emo0000017
pubmed: 25111881
Knudson-Martin, C. Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Fam. Process 52(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12011 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/famp.12011
pubmed: 25408086
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H. & Anderson, C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol. Rev. 110(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265 (2003).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
pubmed: 12747524
Magee, J. C. & Galinsky, A. D. 8 social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2(1), 351–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628 (2008).
doi: 10.1080/19416520802211628
MacKenzie, M. J. & Baumeister, R. F. Motivated gratitude and the need to belong: Social exclusion increases gratitude for people low in trait entitlement. Motiv. Emot. 43(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-09749-3 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11031-018-09749-3
Lindová, J., Průšová, D. & Klapilová, K. Power distribution and relationship quality in long-term heterosexual couples. J. Sex Marital Therapy 46(6), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1761493 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1761493
Mahoney, A. R. & Knudson-Martin, C. The social context of gendered power. In Couples, Gender, and Power: Creating Change in Intimate Relationships (eds Knudson-Martin, C. & Mahoney, A.) 17–29 (Springer Publishing Company, 2009).
Gottman, J. M. Gottman method couple therapy. Clinical Handbook of Couple Therapy (pp. 138–164) (2008). New York: Guildford
Inesi, M. E., Gruenfeld, D. H. & Galinsky, A. D. How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others’ generous acts. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48(4), 795–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.008 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.008
van Kleef, G. A. & Lange, J. How hierarchy shapes our emotional lives: Effects of power and status on emotional experience, expression, and responsiveness. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 33, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.009 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.009
pubmed: 31470224
Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K. & Finkel, E. J. When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 111(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000059 (2016).
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000059
Righetti, F. et al. The prosocial versus proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41(6), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215579054 (2015).
doi: 10.1177/0146167215579054
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 (2007).
doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
pubmed: 17695343
Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 499–500 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988).
Whitton, S. W. & Kuryluk, A. D. Relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms in emerging adults: Cross-sectional associations and moderating effects of relationship characteristics. J. Fam. Psychol. 26(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027267 (2012).
doi: 10.1037/a0027267
pubmed: 22329388
Don, B. P., Fredrickson, B. L. & Algoe, S. B. Enjoying the sweet moments: Does approach motivation upwardly enhance reactivity to positive interpersonal processes?. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 122(6), 1022–1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000312 (2022).
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000312
Mccullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A. & Tsang, J. A. The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 82(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112 (2002).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112
Wei, C., Wu, H., Kong, X. & Wang, H. Revision of gratitude questionnaire—6 in Chinese adolescent and its validity and reliability. Chin. J. School Health 32(10), 1201–1202 (2011).
Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W. & Finkel, E. J. Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 101(3), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022885 (2011).
doi: 10.1037/a0022885
Yang, S., Wang, Z., Liu, Z., & Li, Y. Reliability and validity test of Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale in Chinese version. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 27(5) (2019).
Reis, H. T., Crasta, D., Rogge, R. D., Maniaci, M. R., & Carmichael, C. L. Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS) (Reis & Carmichael, 2006). The Sourcebook of Listening Research: Methodology and Measures (2017), 516–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119102991 .
Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L. & DeJong, W. Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles 42, 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007051506972 (2000).
doi: 10.1023/A:1007051506972
Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A. & Lonsbary, C. The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 92(3), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434 (2007).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434
Hayes, A. F. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper] (2012). Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.pdf
Gordon, A. M. et al. Feeling appreciated buffers against the negative effects of unequal division of household labor on relationship satisfaction. Psychol. Sci. 33(8), 1313–1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221081872 (2022).
doi: 10.1177/09567976221081872
pubmed: 35819837
Arican-Dinc, B. & Gable, S. L. Responsiveness in romantic partners’ interactions. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 53, 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101652 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101652
pubmed: 37515977
Froh, J. J., Yurkewicz, C. & Kashdan, T. B. Gratitude and subjective well-being in early adolescence: Examining gender differences. J. Adolesc. 32(3), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.006 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.006
pubmed: 18760465
Visserman, M. L., Righetti, F., Impett, E. A., Keltner, D. & Van Lange, P. A. M. It’s the motive that counts: Perceived sacrifice motives and gratitude in romantic relationships. Emotion 18(5), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000344 (2018).
doi: 10.1037/emo0000344
pubmed: 28604038
Gadassi, R. et al. Perceived partner responsiveness mediates the association between sexual and marital satisfaction: A daily diary study in Newlywed couples. Arch. Sex. Behav. 45(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0448-2 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0448-2
pubmed: 25680818
Canevello, A. & Crocker, J. Creating good relationships: responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 99(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018186 (2010).
doi: 10.1037/a0018186
Luginbuehl, T. & Schoebi, D. Emotion dynamics and responsiveness in intimate relationships. Emotion 20(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000540 (2020).
doi: 10.1037/emo0000540
pubmed: 30628817
Lemay, E. P. Jr., Clark, M. S. & Feeney, B. C. Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 92(5), 834–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834 (2007).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834
Smith, P. K. & Trope, Y. You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 90(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578 (2006).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E. & Gruenfeld, D. H. Power and perspectives not taken. Psychol. Sci. 17(12), 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x (2006).
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x
pubmed: 17201789
Overbeck, J. R. & Park, B. When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 81(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.549 (2001).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.549
Park, Y., Impett, E. A., MacDonald, G. & Lemay, E. P. Saying “thank you”: Partners’ expressions of gratitude protect relationship satisfaction and commitment from the harmful effects of attachment insecurity. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 117(4), 773–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000178 (2019).
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000178
Lambert, N. M., Clark, M. S., Durtschi, J., Fincham, F. D. & Graham, S. M. Benefits of expressing gratitude: expressing gratitude to a partner changes one’s view of the relationship. Psychol. Sci. 21(4), 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364003 (2010).
doi: 10.1177/0956797610364003
pubmed: 20424104
Balzarini, R. N. et al. The detriments of unmet sexual ideals and buffering effect of sexual communal strength. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 120(6), 1521–1550. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000323 (2021).
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000323
Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L. & Maisel, N. C. It’s the little things: Everyday gratitude as a booster shot for romantic relationships. Pers. Relatsh. 17(2), 217–233 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01273.x
Cole, S. A., Sannidhi, D., Jadotte, Y. T. & Rozanski, A. Using motivational interviewing and brief action planning for adopting and maintaining positive health behaviors. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 77, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2023.02.003 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2023.02.003
pubmed: 36842453
Emmons, R. A. & McCullough, M. E. Counting blessings versus burdens: an experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 84(2), 377 (2003).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377