Classification of hallux valgus deformity-is there a standard?
Classification
Hallux valgus angle
Hallux valgus deformity
Intermetatarsalangle
Radiological
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Sep 2024
11 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
04
03
2024
accepted:
26
08
2024
medline:
11
9
2024
pubmed:
11
9
2024
entrez:
11
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Hallux valgus deformity severity is one determent for the surgical procedure for hallux valgus (HV) correction. HV deformities are usually classified into mild/moderate/severe. The aim was to investigate the cut-off criteria used to classify HV deformity. The study was based on a previous living systematic review. Four common databases were searched for the last decade. All review-steps were conducted by two reviewers. Data assessed were the individual cut-off values used to classify HV deformity into mild/moderate/severe, and the referenced classification systems. 46 studies were included. 21/18 studies grade deformity based on the intermetatarsal angle (IMA)/ hallux valgus angle (HVA) with great heterogeneity throughout the different cut-off values. The most referenced classification systems were the Coughlin and Mann's and the Robinson classification. The currently used classification systems are heterogenic, and no standard could be defined. The community should define a uniform classification system. Level I, systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39259307
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05522-z
pii: 10.1007/s00402-024-05522-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Christina Stukenborg-Colsman
(C)
Sabine Ochman
(S)
Stefan Rammelt
(S)
Hans Polzer
(H)
Natalia Gutteck
(N)
Norbert Harrasser
(N)
Christian Plaass
(C)
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Coughlin MJ, Jones CP (2007) Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 28(7):759–777. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0759
doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0759
pubmed: 17666168
de Cesar NC, Ehret A, Walt J, Chinelati RMK, Dibbern K, de Carvalho KAM et al (2023) Early results and complication rate of the LapiCotton procedure in the treatment of medial longitudinal arch collapse: a prospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(5):2283–2295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04399-0
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04399-0
Izzo A, Vallefuoco S, Basso MA, Ray R, Smeraglia F, Cozzolino A et al (2023) Role of lateral soft tissue release in percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(7):3997–4007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04693-x
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04693-x
pubmed: 36352268
Nunes GA, de Carvalho KAM, Ferreira GF, Filho MVP, Baptista AD, Zambelli R et al (2023) Minimally invasive Chevron Akin (MICA) osteotomy for severe hallux valgus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(9):5507–5514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04849-3
doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04849-3
pubmed: 36977832
Ettinger S, Spindler FT, Savli M, committee DAFs, Baumbach SF (2023) Correction potential and outcome of various surgical procedures for hallux valgus surgery – a living systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg currently under review. not available yet.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 74(9):790–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010
doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010
pubmed: 34446261
da Costa Santos CM, de Mattos Pimenta CA, Nobre MR (2007) The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 15(3):508–511. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023
doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023
pubmed: 17653438
Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200301000-00001
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00001
pubmed: 12533564
Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Wells GA, Wells G, Shea B, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, et al., editors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses2014.
Avcu B, Akalin Y, Cevik N, Öztürk A, Sahin N, Öztas S et al (2017) Scarf osteotomy or Mau osteotomy for correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity: a prospective randomized study. Eur Res J. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.302186
doi: 10.18621/eurj.302186
Biz C, Fosser M, Dalmau-Pastor M, Corradin M, Roda MG, Aldegheri R et al (2016) Functional and radiographic outcomes of hallux valgus correction by mini-invasive surgery with Reverdin-Isham and Akin percutaneous osteotomies: a longitudinal prospective study with a 48-month follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 11(1):157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0491-x
doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0491-x
pubmed: 27919259
pmcid: 5139107
Boychenko AV, Solomin LN, Belokrylova MS, Tyulkin EO, Davidov DV, Krutko DM (2019) Hallux valgus correction with rotational scarf combined with adductor hallucis tendon transposition. J Foot Ankle Surg 58(1):34–37. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.012
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.012
pubmed: 30448186
Buciuto R (2014) Prospective randomized study of chevron osteotomy versus Mitchell’s osteotomy in hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 35(12):1268–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714550647
doi: 10.1177/1071100714550647
pubmed: 25209122
Choi JY, Kim BH, Suh JS (2021) A prospective study to compare the operative outcomes of minimally invasive proximal and distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy for moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformity. Int Orthop 45(11):2933–2943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05106-1
doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05106-1
pubmed: 34272980
Di Giorgio L, Sodano L, Touloupakis G, De Meo D, Marcellini L (2016) Reverdin-Isham osteotomy versus Endolog system for correction of moderate hallux valgus deformity: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Ter 167(6):e150–e154. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2016.1960
doi: 10.7417/CT.2016.1960
pubmed: 28051828
Dragosloveanu S, Popov VM, Cotor DC, Dragosloveanu C, Stoica CI (2022) Percutaneous chevron osteotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Medicina (Kaunas). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030359
doi: 10.3390/medicina58030359
pubmed: 36143953
Elshazly O, Abdel Rahman AF, Fahmy H, Sobhy MH, Abdelhadi W (2019) Scarf versus long chevron osteotomies for the treatment of hallux valgus: a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Surg 25(4):469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.017
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.017
pubmed: 30321962
Faber FW, Mulder PG, Verhaar JA (2004) Role of first ray hypermobility in the outcome of the Hohmann and the Lapidus procedure. A prospective, randomized trial involving one hundred and one feet. J Bone Joint Surg Am. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200403000-00005
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200403000-00005
pubmed: 14996873
Faber FW, van Kampen PM, Bloembergen MW (2013) Long-term results of the Hohmann and Lapidus procedure for the correction of hallux valgus: a prospective, randomised trial with eight- to 11-year follow-up involving 101 feet. Bone Joint J. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.31560
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.31560
pubmed: 23997136
Frigg A, Zaugg S, Maquieira G, Pellegrino A (2019) Stiffness and range of motion after minimally invasive chevron-akin and open scarf-akin procedures. Foot Ankle Int 40(5):515–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718818577
doi: 10.1177/1071100718818577
pubmed: 30688526
Giannini S, Cavallo M, Faldini C, Luciani D, Vannini F (2013) The SERI distal metatarsal osteotomy and Scarf osteotomy provide similar correction of hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(7):2305–2311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2912-z
doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2912-z
pubmed: 23494184
pmcid: 3676577
Glazebrook M, Copithorne P, Boyd G, Daniels T, Lalonde KA, Francis P et al (2014) Proximal opening wedge osteotomy with wedge-plate fixation compared with proximal chevron osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(19):1585–1592. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00231
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00231
pubmed: 25274783
Gutteck N, Wohlrab D, Zeh A, Radetzki F, Delank KS, Lebek S (2013) Comparative study of Lapidus bunionectomy using different osteosynthesis methods. Foot Ankle Surg 19(4):218–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2013.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.05.002
pubmed: 24095227
Hofstaetter SG, Schuh R, Trieb K, Trnka HJ (2012) Modified chevron osteotomy with lateral release and screw fixation for treatment of severe hallux deformity. Z Orthop Unfall 150(6):594–600. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1327933
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327933
pubmed: 23303613
Jeuken RM, Schotanus MG, Kort NP, Deenik A, Jong B, Hendrickx RP (2016) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing scarf to chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus correction. Foot Ankle Int 37(7):687–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716639574
doi: 10.1177/1071100716639574
pubmed: 27009063
Jowett CRJ, Bedi HS (2017) Preliminary results and learning curve of the minimally invasive chevron akin operation for hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg 56(3):445–452. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.002
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.002
pubmed: 28237566
Kaufmann G, Dammerer D, Heyenbrock F, Braito M, Moertlbauer L, Liebensteiner M (2019) Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 43(2):343–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4006-8
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4006-8
pubmed: 29869014
Kaufmann G, Mortlbauer L, Hofer-Picout P, Dammerer D, Ban M, Liebensteiner M (2020) Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive distal metatarsal chevron osteotomy in comparison with the open technique: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102(10):873–879. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00981
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00981
pubmed: 32149929
Kaufmann G, Weiskopf D, Liebensteiner M, Ulmer H, Braito M, Endstrasser F et al (2021) Midterm results following minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy: comparison with the minimally invasive reverdin-isham osteotomy by means of meta-analysis. In Vivo. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12490
doi: 10.21873/invivo.12490
pubmed: 34182496
pmcid: 8286526
Kiyak G, Esemenli T (2019) Should we use intermetatarsal angle as primary determinant to define the limits of distal chevron osteotomy? J Foot Ankle Surg 58(5):880–885. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.031
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.031
pubmed: 31345758
Klemola T, Leppilahti J, Laine V, Pentikainen I, Ojala R, Ohtonen P et al (2017) Effect of first tarsometatarsal joint derotational arthrodesis on first ray dynamic stability compared to distal chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 38(8):847–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717706153
doi: 10.1177/1071100717706153
pubmed: 28686846
Lamo-Espinosa JM, Flórez B, Villas C, Pons-Villanueva J, Bondía JM, Aquerreta JD et al (2015) The relationship between the sesamoid complex and the first metatarsal after hallux valgus surgery without lateral soft-tissue release: a prospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(6):1111–1115. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.07.022
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.07.022
pubmed: 26364703
Lechler P, Feldmann C, Köck FX, Schaumburger J, Grifka J, Handel M (2012) Clinical outcome after chevron-akin double osteotomy versus isolated chevron procedure: a prospective matched group analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1385-3
doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1385-3
pubmed: 21874575
Lee KB, Cho NY, Park HW, Seon JK, Lee SH (2015) A comparison of proximal and distal Chevron osteotomy, both with lateral soft-tissue release, for moderate to severe hallux valgus in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral correction: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34449
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34449
pubmed: 26637680
Lee M, Walsh J, Smith MM, Ling J, Wines A, Lam P (2017) Hallux valgus correction comparing percutaneous chevron/akin (PECA) and open scarf/akin osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int 38(8):838–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717704941
doi: 10.1177/1071100717704941
pubmed: 28476096
Ling SKK, Wu YM, Li C, Lui TH, Yung PS (2020) Randomised control trial on the optimal duration of non-weight-bearing walking after hallux valgus surgery. J Orthop Translat 23:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.04.009
doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.04.009
pubmed: 32489861
pmcid: 7256050
Loh B, Chen JY, Yew AK, Chong HC, Yeo MG, Tao P et al (2015) Prevalence of metatarsus adductus in symptomatic hallux valgus and its influence on functional outcome. Foot Ankle Int 36(11):1316–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715595618
doi: 10.1177/1071100715595618
pubmed: 26202480
Mahadevan D, Lines S, Hepple S, Winson I, Harries W (2016) Extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A randomised controlled trial. Foot Ankle Surg 22(2):109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2015.05.012
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.05.012
pubmed: 27301730
Matricali GA, Vermeersch G, Busschots E, Fieuws S, Deschamps K (2014) Prospective randomized comparative study on V-Y and pants-over-vest capsulorraphy in chevron and scarf osteotomy. Acta Orthop Belg 80(2):280–7. not available.
Milczarek M, Nowak K, Tomasik B, Milczarek J, Laganowski P, Domzalski M (2021) Additional akin proximal phalanx procedure has a limited effect on the outcome of scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. https://doi.org/10.7547/20-071
doi: 10.7547/20-071
pubmed: 35061598
Mosca M, Russo A, Caravelli S, Massimi S, Vocale E, Grassi A et al (2021) Piezoelectric tools versus traditional oscillating saw for distal linear osteotomy in hallux valgus correction: Triple-blinded, randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.024
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.024
pubmed: 33840570
Palmanovich E, Ohana N, David S, Small I, Hetsroni I, Amar E et al (2021) Distal chevron osteotomy vs the simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive technique (SERI) for mild to moderate isolated hallux valgus: a randomized controlled study. Indian J Orthop 55(Suppl 1):110–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00209-0
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00209-0
pubmed: 34122763
Park HW, Lee KB, Chung JY, Kim MS (2013) Comparison of outcomes between proximal and distal chevron osteotomy, both with supplementary lateral soft-tissue release, for severe hallux valgus deformity: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.30464
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.30464
pubmed: 23997140
Park YB, Lee KB, Kim SK, Seon JK, Lee JY (2013) Comparison of distal soft-tissue procedures combined with a distal chevron osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus: first web-space versus transarticular approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(21):e158. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01017
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01017
pubmed: 24196470
Patel S, Garg P, Fazal MA, Shahid MS, Park DH, Ray PS (2019) A comparison of two designs of postoperative shoe on function, satisfaction, and back pain after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Spec 12(3):228–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640018782608
doi: 10.1177/1938640018782608
pubmed: 29909640
Pentikainen I, Ojala R, Ohtonen P, Piippo J, Leppilahti J (2014) Preoperative radiological factors correlated to long-term recurrence of hallux valgus following distal chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 35(12):1262–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714548703
doi: 10.1177/1071100714548703
pubmed: 25192724
Pentikainen I, Piippo J, Ohtonen P, Junila J, Leppilahti J (2015) Role of fixation and postoperative regimens in the long-term outcomes of distal chevron osteotomy: a randomized controlled two-by-two factorial trial of 100 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(3):356–360. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.001
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.001
pubmed: 25441855
Puchner SE, Trnka HJ, Willegger M, Staats K, Holinka J, Windhager R et al (2018) Comparison of plantar pressure distribution and functional outcome after scarf and austin osteotomy. Orthop Surg 10(3):255–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12400
doi: 10.1111/os.12400
pubmed: 30152604
pmcid: 6594478
Radwan YA, Mansour AM (2012) Percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy versus distal chevron osteotomy for correction of mild-to-moderate hallux valgus deformity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(11):1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1585-5
doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1585-5
pubmed: 22821414
Sahin N, Cansabuncu G, Cevik N, Turker O, Ozkaya G, Ozkan Y (2018) A randomized comparison of the proximal crescentic osteotomy and rotational scarf osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 52(4):261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2018.02.008
doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.02.008
pubmed: 29606549
pmcid: 6150448
Saxena A, St Louis M (2013) Medial locking plate versus screw fixation for fixation of the Ludloff osteotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(2):153–157. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2012.11.005
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.11.005
pubmed: 23333281
Torrent J, Baduell A, Vega J, Malagelada F, Luna R, Rabat E (2021) Open vs minimally invasive scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int 42(8):982–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007211003565
doi: 10.1177/10711007211003565
pubmed: 34024185
Uygur E, Ozkan NK, Akan K, Cift H (2016) A comparison of chevron and lindgren-turan osteotomy techniques in hallux valgus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(3):255–261. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2016.14.0272
doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2016.14.0272
pubmed: 27130379
Wester JU, Hamborg-Petersen E, Herold N, Hansen PB, Froekjaer J (2016) Open wedge metatarsal osteotomy versus crescentic osteotomy to correct severe hallux valgus deformity–A prospective comparative study. Foot Ankle Surg 22(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2015.04.006
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.04.006
pubmed: 26869496
Windhagen H, Radtke K, Weizbauer A, Diekmann J, Noll Y, Kreimeyer U et al (2013) Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically equivalent to titanium screw in hallux valgus surgery: short term results of the first prospective, randomized, controlled clinical pilot study. BioMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-62
doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-62
Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Mann RA (2013) Mann’s surgery of the foot and ankle Philadelphia. Mosby
Robinson AH, Limbers JP (2005) Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(8):1038–1045. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B8.16467
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B8.16467
pubmed: 16049235
Coughlin MJ, Haskell A (2024) Coughlin and Mann’s surgery of the foot an ankle Philadelphia. Elsevier Philadelphia, PA
Meyr AJ, Doyle MD, King CM, Kwaadu KY, Nasser EM, Ramdass R et al (2022) The american college of foot and ankle surgeons(R) clinical consensus statement: hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg 61(2):369–383. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.08.011
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.08.011
pubmed: 34706857
Santrock RD, Smith B (2018) Hallux valgus deformity and treatment: a three-dimensional approach: modified technique for lapidus procedure. Foot Ankle Clin 23(2):281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2018.02.001
doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2018.02.001
pubmed: 29729802
Ferreira GF, Nunes GA, Banca V, Michaelis LF, Lewis TL, Ray R et al (2024) Minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery using 3D printed patient specific instrumentation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05383-6
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05383-6
pubmed: 38780773
Palmanovich E, Ohana N, Tavdi A, Atzmon R, Feldman V, Brin YS et al (2023) A modified minimally invasive osteotomy for hallux valgus enables reduction of malpositioned sesamoid bones. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(10):6105–6112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04868-0
doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04868-0
pubmed: 37202550
Bernasconi A, Rizzo M, Izzo A, Vallefuoco S, Russo AP, Rossi V et al (2023) Bosch osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: results at a mean 10-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(3):1293–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04259-3
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04259-3
pubmed: 34839385
Harrasser N, Hinterwimmer F, Baumbach SF, Pfahl K, Glowalla C, Walther M et al (2023) The distal metatarsal screw is not always necessary in third-generation MICA: a case-control study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(8):4633–4639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04740-7
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04740-7
pubmed: 36577799
Lee HY, Mansur NS, Lalevee M, Maly C, Iehl CJ, Hembree WC et al (2023) Does metatarsus primus elevatus really exist in hallux rigidus? A weightbearing CT case-control study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(2):755–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04168-5
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04168-5
pubmed: 34505168