"It should be hard to be a drug abuser" An evaluation of the criminalization of drug use in Sweden.

Criminalization Drug Policy Regulation Sweden Trends

Journal

The International journal on drug policy
ISSN: 1873-4758
Titre abrégé: Int J Drug Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9014759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 22 03 2024
revised: 01 07 2024
accepted: 28 08 2024
medline: 11 9 2024
pubmed: 11 9 2024
entrez: 11 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Drug use was criminalized in Sweden in 1988 with aim of reducing the number of consumers and drug-related risks and harms. Imprisonment was introduced into the penalty scale in 1993 to improve the legislation's effectiveness. The criminalization has never been evaluated. Goal-attainment evaluation based on a range of indicators from surveys, case-finding estimates, healthcare and cause-of-death data, and crime statistics. Comparative drug policy analysis is conducted with other Nordic countries. The criminalization is not followed by a reduced or more expensive drug supply, reduced consumption levels, problematic drug use or healthcare needs, or to fewer drug-related deaths. Most of the indicators instead show the opposite. Control costs are high, and trends are no better than those of other Nordic countries, despite Sweden's more repressive drug policy. Criminalization emerges as an ineffective, expensive and harmful means of dealing with the drugs problem.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Drug use was criminalized in Sweden in 1988 with aim of reducing the number of consumers and drug-related risks and harms. Imprisonment was introduced into the penalty scale in 1993 to improve the legislation's effectiveness. The criminalization has never been evaluated.
METHOD METHODS
Goal-attainment evaluation based on a range of indicators from surveys, case-finding estimates, healthcare and cause-of-death data, and crime statistics. Comparative drug policy analysis is conducted with other Nordic countries.
RESULTS RESULTS
The criminalization is not followed by a reduced or more expensive drug supply, reduced consumption levels, problematic drug use or healthcare needs, or to fewer drug-related deaths. Most of the indicators instead show the opposite. Control costs are high, and trends are no better than those of other Nordic countries, despite Sweden's more repressive drug policy.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Criminalization emerges as an ineffective, expensive and harmful means of dealing with the drugs problem.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39260161
pii: S0955-3959(24)00257-3
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104573
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104573

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Albin Stenström (A)

Department of Criminology, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10C, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: albin.stenstrom@criminology.su.se.

Felipe Estrada (F)

Department of Criminology, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10C, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.

Henrik Tham (H)

Department of Criminology, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10C, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH