Exploring mismatch negativity in children with congenital Microtia-Atresia: A Preliminary study.

Bonebridge Congenital microtia Mismatch negativity

Journal

Brain research
ISSN: 1872-6240
Titre abrégé: Brain Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0045503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 05 03 2024
revised: 04 08 2024
accepted: 05 09 2024
medline: 12 9 2024
pubmed: 12 9 2024
entrez: 11 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To investigate the characteristics of mismatch negativity (MMN) in terms of latency and amplitude in children with bilateral congenital microtia using a Bone conduction implant (Bonebridge), and to explore the relationship between cortical level auditory discrimination, speech perception, and psychosocial well-being. This descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study compared three groups: eight children with bilateral congenital microtia and Bonebridge implants (bilateral group), eight children with unilateral congenital microtia and no hearing aids (unilateral group), and eight children with normal hearing (NH group). Participants underwent MMN evaluation using a classic oddball paradigm with a pure tone burst stimulus, featuring a 1000 Hz standard stimulus and a 1200 Hz deviant stimulus, presented in a sound field at 65 dBHL. Additionally, speech perception tests, the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS), and psychosocial status questionnaires, including the Social Anxiety Scale for Children (SASC) and the Children's Loneliness Scale (CLS), were administered to all subjects. The bilateral group's average MMN latency was 241.23 ± 29.47 ms, and the unilateral group's was 209.96 ± 54.32 ms, both significantly longer than the NH group's 146.05 ± 15.73 ms (p < 0.0001, F=3.509, 95 % CI 68.09 to 122.3 and p = 0.0097, F=11.92, 95 % CI 18.07 to 109.8, respectively). However, no significant difference was found in MMN latency between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = 0.202, F=3.397, 95 % CI -18.84 to 81.36). The unilateral group scored significantly higher on the MUSS (38.63 ± 1.41 vs. 30.75 ± 3.80, p = 0.0001, F=7.276, 95 % CI -11.16 to -4.590), had lower CLS scores (47.13 ± 8.13 vs. 58.25 ± 8.39, p = 0.024, F=1.065, 95 % CI 1.652 to 20.60), and lower SASC scores (4.13 ± 2.09 vs. 6.50 ± 2.25, p = 0.062, F=1.204, 95 % CI -0.138 to 4.89) compared to the bilateral group. MMN latency in the bilateral group correlated with SASC scores. The MMN latency in congenital microtia patients may serve as an indicator of central auditory discrimination capabilities. In children with bilateral congenital microtia and Bonebridge implants, MMN latency can reflect social anxiety conditions to a certain degree.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To investigate the characteristics of mismatch negativity (MMN) in terms of latency and amplitude in children with bilateral congenital microtia using a Bone conduction implant (Bonebridge), and to explore the relationship between cortical level auditory discrimination, speech perception, and psychosocial well-being.
METHODS METHODS
This descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study compared three groups: eight children with bilateral congenital microtia and Bonebridge implants (bilateral group), eight children with unilateral congenital microtia and no hearing aids (unilateral group), and eight children with normal hearing (NH group). Participants underwent MMN evaluation using a classic oddball paradigm with a pure tone burst stimulus, featuring a 1000 Hz standard stimulus and a 1200 Hz deviant stimulus, presented in a sound field at 65 dBHL. Additionally, speech perception tests, the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS), and psychosocial status questionnaires, including the Social Anxiety Scale for Children (SASC) and the Children's Loneliness Scale (CLS), were administered to all subjects.
RESULTS RESULTS
The bilateral group's average MMN latency was 241.23 ± 29.47 ms, and the unilateral group's was 209.96 ± 54.32 ms, both significantly longer than the NH group's 146.05 ± 15.73 ms (p < 0.0001, F=3.509, 95 % CI 68.09 to 122.3 and p = 0.0097, F=11.92, 95 % CI 18.07 to 109.8, respectively). However, no significant difference was found in MMN latency between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = 0.202, F=3.397, 95 % CI -18.84 to 81.36). The unilateral group scored significantly higher on the MUSS (38.63 ± 1.41 vs. 30.75 ± 3.80, p = 0.0001, F=7.276, 95 % CI -11.16 to -4.590), had lower CLS scores (47.13 ± 8.13 vs. 58.25 ± 8.39, p = 0.024, F=1.065, 95 % CI 1.652 to 20.60), and lower SASC scores (4.13 ± 2.09 vs. 6.50 ± 2.25, p = 0.062, F=1.204, 95 % CI -0.138 to 4.89) compared to the bilateral group. MMN latency in the bilateral group correlated with SASC scores.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The MMN latency in congenital microtia patients may serve as an indicator of central auditory discrimination capabilities. In children with bilateral congenital microtia and Bonebridge implants, MMN latency can reflect social anxiety conditions to a certain degree.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39260787
pii: S0006-8993(24)00484-0
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149230
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

149230

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Wenjie Song (W)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing 100730, China.

Xinmiao Fan (X)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing 100730, China.

Xin Xia (X)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing 100730, China.

Wei Gu (W)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing 100730, China.

Tengyu Yang (T)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing 100730, China.

Yue Fan (Y)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing 100730, China. Electronic address: chromefan@126.com.

Xiaoli Li (X)

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Xiaowei Chen (X)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing 100730, China. Electronic address: chenxw_pumch@163.com.

Classifications MeSH