Liquid Biopsy in Progressing Prostate Cancer Patients Starting Docetaxel with or Without Enzalutamide: A Biomarker Study of the PRESIDE Phase 3b Trial.

Androgen receptor gain Androgen receptor splice variants Circulating tumor cells Docetaxel Enzalutamide Liquid biopsy resistance biomarker Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer PRESIDE trial Plasma circulating tumor DNA

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 08 07 2024
accepted: 09 08 2024
medline: 12 9 2024
pubmed: 12 9 2024
entrez: 11 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The PRESIDE (NCT02288247) randomized trial demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with continuing enzalutamide beyond progression in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients starting docetaxel. This study aims to test the associations of PFS and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) prior to and after one cycle (cycle 2 day 1 [C2D1]) of docetaxel and with a liquid biopsy resistance biomarker (LBRB; plasma androgen receptor [AR] gain and/or circulating tumor cells [CTCs] expressing AR splice variant 7 [CTC-AR-V7]) prior to continuation of enzalutamide/placebo. Patients consenting to the biomarker substudy and donating blood before starting docetaxel with enzalutamide/placebo (N = 157) were included. Sequential plasma DNA samples were characterized with a prostate-cancer bespoke next-generation-sequencing capture panel (PCF_SELECT), and CTCs were assessed for AR-V7 (Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Cox models, Kaplan-Meier, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 18 mo were calculated. There was a significant association of worse PFS with pre-docetaxel ctDNA detection (N = 86 (55%), 8.1 vs 10.8 mo hazard ratio [HR] = 1.78, p = 0.004) or persistence/rise of ctDNA at C2D1 (N = 35/134, 5.5 vs 10.9 mo, HR = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-3.30, p = 0.019). LBRB-positive patients (N = 62) had no benefit from continuing enzalutamide with docetaxel (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.41-1.48, p = 0.44; RMST: 7.9 vs 7.1 mo, p = 0.50). Conversely, resistance biomarker-negative patients (N = 87) had significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.29-0.82, p = 0.006; RMST: 11.5 vs 8.9 mo, p = 0.005). Eight patients were unevaluable. An exploratory analysis identified increased copy-number gains (CDK6/CDK4) at progression on docetaxel. Limitations included relatively low detection of CTC-AR-V7. Validation of impact on overall survival is required. Liquid biopsy gives an early indication of docetaxel futility, could guide patient selection for continuing enzalutamide, and identifies cell cycle gene alterations as a potential cause of docetaxel resistance in mCRPC. In the PRESIDE biomarker study, we found that detecting circulating tumor DNA in plasma after starting treatment with docetaxel (chemotherapy) for metastatic prostate cancer resistant to androgen deprivation therapy can predict early how long patients will take to respond to treatment. Patients negative for a liquid biopsy resistance biomarker (based on the status of androgen receptor (AR) gene and AR splice variant 7 in circulating tumor cells) benefit from continuing enzalutamide in combination with docetaxel, while patients positive for the resistance biomarker did not. Additionally, we identified alterations in the cell cycle genes CDK6 and CDK4 as a potential genetic cause of resistance to docetaxel, which may support testing of specific drugs targeting these alterations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The PRESIDE (NCT02288247) randomized trial demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with continuing enzalutamide beyond progression in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients starting docetaxel. This study aims to test the associations of PFS and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) prior to and after one cycle (cycle 2 day 1 [C2D1]) of docetaxel and with a liquid biopsy resistance biomarker (LBRB; plasma androgen receptor [AR] gain and/or circulating tumor cells [CTCs] expressing AR splice variant 7 [CTC-AR-V7]) prior to continuation of enzalutamide/placebo.
METHODS METHODS
Patients consenting to the biomarker substudy and donating blood before starting docetaxel with enzalutamide/placebo (N = 157) were included. Sequential plasma DNA samples were characterized with a prostate-cancer bespoke next-generation-sequencing capture panel (PCF_SELECT), and CTCs were assessed for AR-V7 (Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Cox models, Kaplan-Meier, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 18 mo were calculated.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS UNASSIGNED
There was a significant association of worse PFS with pre-docetaxel ctDNA detection (N = 86 (55%), 8.1 vs 10.8 mo hazard ratio [HR] = 1.78, p = 0.004) or persistence/rise of ctDNA at C2D1 (N = 35/134, 5.5 vs 10.9 mo, HR = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-3.30, p = 0.019). LBRB-positive patients (N = 62) had no benefit from continuing enzalutamide with docetaxel (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.41-1.48, p = 0.44; RMST: 7.9 vs 7.1 mo, p = 0.50). Conversely, resistance biomarker-negative patients (N = 87) had significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.29-0.82, p = 0.006; RMST: 11.5 vs 8.9 mo, p = 0.005). Eight patients were unevaluable. An exploratory analysis identified increased copy-number gains (CDK6/CDK4) at progression on docetaxel. Limitations included relatively low detection of CTC-AR-V7. Validation of impact on overall survival is required.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Liquid biopsy gives an early indication of docetaxel futility, could guide patient selection for continuing enzalutamide, and identifies cell cycle gene alterations as a potential cause of docetaxel resistance in mCRPC.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
In the PRESIDE biomarker study, we found that detecting circulating tumor DNA in plasma after starting treatment with docetaxel (chemotherapy) for metastatic prostate cancer resistant to androgen deprivation therapy can predict early how long patients will take to respond to treatment. Patients negative for a liquid biopsy resistance biomarker (based on the status of androgen receptor (AR) gene and AR splice variant 7 in circulating tumor cells) benefit from continuing enzalutamide in combination with docetaxel, while patients positive for the resistance biomarker did not. Additionally, we identified alterations in the cell cycle genes CDK6 and CDK4 as a potential genetic cause of resistance to docetaxel, which may support testing of specific drugs targeting these alterations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39261236
pii: S2588-9311(24)00188-3
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Maria Ruiz-Vico (M)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; PhD Program in Biomedicine Research, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Daniel Wetterskog (D)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Francesco Orlando (F)

Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

Suparna Thakali (S)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Anna Wingate (A)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Anuradha Jayaram (A)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Paolo Cremaschi (P)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Osvaldas Vainauskas (O)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Nicole Brighi (N)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Daniel Castellano-Gauna (D)

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Lennart Åström (L)

Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.

Vsevolod B Matveev (VB)

Department of Urology, Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia.

Sergio Bracarda (S)

Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy.

Adil Esen (A)

Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University, Konak, Turkey.

Susan Feyerabend (S)

Studienpraxis Urologie, Medius Klinik Nürtingen, Nürtingen, Germany.

Elżbieta Senkus (E)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

Marta López-Brea Piqueras (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria, Spain.

Santosh Gupta (S)

Translational Research, Epic Sciences Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.

Rick Wenstrup (R)

Translational Research, Epic Sciences Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.

Gunther Boysen (G)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Addlestone, UK.

Karla Martins (K)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Addlestone, UK.

Kenneth Iwata (K)

Astellas Pharma USA, Northbrook, IL, USA.

Simon Chowdhury (S)

Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK.

Georgia Gourgioti (G)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Addlestone, UK.

Alexis Serikoff (A)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Addlestone, UK.

Enrique Gonzalez-Billalabeitia (E)

PhD Program in Biomedicine Research, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Axel S Merseburger (AS)

Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.

Francesca Demichelis (F)

Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

Gerhardt Attard (G)

Oncology Department, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. Electronic address: g.attard@ucl.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH