Marginal adaptation of customized gutta percha cone with calcium silicate based sealer versus MTA and biodentine apical plugs in simulated immature permanent teeth (an in vitro study).
Biodentine
Calcium silicate
Customized gutta percha
Dental marginal adaptation
Mineral trioxide aggregate
Scanning electron microscope
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Sep 2024
11 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
14
07
2024
accepted:
16
08
2024
medline:
12
9
2024
pubmed:
12
9
2024
entrez:
11
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of a single customized gutta percha cone with calcium silicate-based sealer versus mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine apical plugs in simulated immature permanent teeth. Thirty-nine extracted human maxillary anterior teeth were selected, prepared to simulate immature permanent teeth with an apical diameter 1.1 mm, placed in moist foam and divided into three groups. Group 1: Obturation with a single customized gutta percha cone and calcium silicate sealer. Group 2: MTA apical plug. Group 3: Biodentine apical plug. After incubation, teeth were horizontally sectioned at 1 mm and 3 mm from the apex and marginal adaptation was evaluated using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Biodentine showed the least mean gap size at both 1 and 3 mm from the apex with no statistically significant differences compared to MTA (p > 0.05). The single customized cone with calcium silicate based sealer showed the greatest mean gap size at both 1 and 3 mm from the apex with a statistically significant difference compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). Biodentine and MTA apical plugs provide a significantly better marginal adaptation to the dentinal walls than a single customized gutta percha cone with calcium silicate based sealer in simulated immature permanent teeth.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of a single customized gutta percha cone with calcium silicate-based sealer versus mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine apical plugs in simulated immature permanent teeth.
METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-nine extracted human maxillary anterior teeth were selected, prepared to simulate immature permanent teeth with an apical diameter 1.1 mm, placed in moist foam and divided into three groups. Group 1: Obturation with a single customized gutta percha cone and calcium silicate sealer. Group 2: MTA apical plug. Group 3: Biodentine apical plug. After incubation, teeth were horizontally sectioned at 1 mm and 3 mm from the apex and marginal adaptation was evaluated using scanning electron microscope (SEM).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Biodentine showed the least mean gap size at both 1 and 3 mm from the apex with no statistically significant differences compared to MTA (p > 0.05). The single customized cone with calcium silicate based sealer showed the greatest mean gap size at both 1 and 3 mm from the apex with a statistically significant difference compared to the other groups (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Biodentine and MTA apical plugs provide a significantly better marginal adaptation to the dentinal walls than a single customized gutta percha cone with calcium silicate based sealer in simulated immature permanent teeth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39261838
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04765-x
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04765-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Silicates
0
Calcium Compounds
0
Aluminum Compounds
0
Drug Combinations
0
tricalcium silicate
404G39282C
Oxides
0
mineral trioxide aggregate
0
Gutta-Percha
9000-32-2
Root Canal Filling Materials
0
calcium silicate
S4255P4G5M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1069Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Muliyar S, Shameem KA, Thankachan RP, Francis PG, Jayapalan CS, Hafiz KA. Microleakage in endodontics. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):99–104.
pubmed: 25628496
pmcid: 4295468
Duggal M, Tong HJ, Al-Ansary M, Twati W, Day PF, Nazzal H. Interventions for the endodontic management of non-vital traumatised immature permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents: a systematic review of the evidence and guidelines of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(3):139–51.
pubmed: 28508244
pmcid: 5488080
doi: 10.1007/s40368-017-0289-5
Gill I, Mittal S, Kumar T, Keshav V. Open apex and its management: review article. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S31–4.
pubmed: 38595371
pmcid: 11000961
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_615_23
Lee BN, Moon JW, Chang HS, Hwang IN, Oh WM, Hwang YC. A review of the regenerative endodontic treatment procedure. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(3):179–87.
pubmed: 26295020
pmcid: 4534721
doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.179
Ong TK, Lim GS, Singh M, Fial AV. Quantitative assessment of root development after regenerative endodontic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2020;46(12):1856–e662.
pubmed: 32827507
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.08.016
Hatipoğlu FP, Hatipoğlu Ö, Taha N, Lehmann AP, Aldhelai TA, Madfa AA, et al. Attitude and practice of regenerative endodontic procedures among endodontists and paediatric dentists: a multinational survey from 13 countries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023;33(5):521–34.
pubmed: 37350350
doi: 10.1111/ipd.13101
Kim SG, Malek M, Sigurdsson A, Lin LM, Kahler B. Regenerative endodontics: a comprehensive review. Int Endod J. 2018;51(12):1367–88.
pubmed: 29777616
doi: 10.1111/iej.12954
Boufdil H, Mtalsi M, El Arabi S, Bousfiha B. Apexification with calcium hydroxide vs. revascularization. Case Rep Dent. 2020;2020(1):9861609.
pubmed: 32550029
Rahoma A, AlShwaimi E, Majeed A. Push-out bond strength of different types of mineral trioxide aggregate in root dentin. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018;12(5):66–9.
pubmed: 30202410
Bani M, Sungurtekin-Ekçi E, Odabaş ME. Efficacy of biodentine as an apical plug in nonvital permanent teeth with open apices: an in vitro study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015(1):359275.
pubmed: 26436090
pmcid: 4575981
Aricioglu B, Gunacar DN, Kosar T, Sanal Cikman A, Pertek Hatipoglu F, Maras E. Assessment of bone quality of apical periodontitis treated with MTA plug and regenerative endodontic techniques. Aust Endod J. 2022;48(3):444–50.
pubmed: 36197584
doi: 10.1111/aej.12697
Esen M, Guven Y, Seyhan MF, Ersev H, Tuna-Ince EB. Evaluation of the genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and bioactivity of calcium silicate-based cements. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):119.
pubmed: 38245737
pmcid: 10799466
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03891-w
Srivastava P, Sawhney A, Sharma R, Hans MK, Agarwal S, Dhar S. Biodentine used as an apical barrier for the treatment of open apex. J Dent Res Rev. 2020;7(3):147–50.
Malkondu Ö, Kazandaǧ MK, Kazazoǧlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014(1):160951.
pubmed: 25025034
pmcid: 4082844
Abdelwahed A, Nabil Roshdy N, Elbanna A. Evaluation of push-out bond strength of ceraSeal bioceramic sealer with different obturation techniques. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(3):2655–62.
doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.64108.1520
Sfeir G, Zogheib C, Patel S, Giraud T, Nagendrababu V, Bukiet F. Calcium silicate-based Root Canal Sealers: a narrative review and clinical perspectives. Mater (Basel). 2021;14(14):3965.
doi: 10.3390/ma14143965
Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Fleury A, Solomon E, He J. Clinical outcome of non-surgical Root Canal Treatment using a single-cone technique with endosequence bioceramic sealer: a retrospective analysis. J Endod. 2018;44(6):941–5.
pubmed: 29606401
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.019
van Zyl SP, Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Effect of customization of master gutta-percha cone on apical control of root filling using different techniques: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2005;38(9):658–66.
pubmed: 16104980
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01005.x
Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42(1):19–26.
pubmed: 28194360
doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.19
Ferreira I, Pina-Vaz I. The Novel role of solvents in non-surgical endodontic retreatment. Appl Sci. 2022;12(11):5492.
doi: 10.3390/app12115492
Berman LH, Hargreaves KM. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. 12th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2020.
Metzger Z, Kfir A. Preparing the master cone to fit the shape of the canal vs. preparing the canal to the shape of an industrial master cone. IP Indian J Conserv Endod. 2017;2(3):98–106.
Nagendrababu V, Murray PE, Ordinola-Zapata R, Peters OA, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, et al. PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in endodontology: a consensus-based development. Int Endod J. 2021;54(9):1482–90.
pubmed: 33938010
doi: 10.1111/iej.13542
de Sá MAB, Nunes E, Antunes ANDG, Brito Júnior M, Horta MCR, Amaral RR, et al. Push-out bond strength and marginal adaptation of apical plugs with bioactive endodontic cements in simulated immature teeth. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(4):e53.
pubmed: 34909417
pmcid: 8636078
doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e53
Denyer M. Medical statistics at a glance. J Anat. 2010;216(4):543.
pmcid: 2849533
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01210.x
Snigdha NTS, Kamarudin A, Baharin F, Ghani NRNA, Bin Yhaya MF, Ahmad WMAW, et al. Evaluation of bacterial leakage and marginal adaptation of the bioceramics pulp dressing materials: an invitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):462.
pubmed: 37420224
pmcid: 10329390
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03129-1
Lertmalapong P, Jantarat J, Srisatjaluk RL, Komoltri C. Bacterial leakage and marginal adaptation of various bioceramics as apical plug in open apex model. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(1):e12371.
pubmed: 30468009
doi: 10.1111/jicd.12371
Mirseifinejad R, Tabrizizade M, Davari A, Mehravar F. Efficacy of different root canal irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(2):185–90.
pubmed: 28512483
pmcid: 5431723
Pedullà E, Abiad RS, Conte G, La Rosa GRM, Rapisarda E, Neelakantan P. Root fillings with a matched-taper single cone and two calcium silicate-based sealers: an analysis of voids using micro-computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(12):4487–92.
pubmed: 32382928
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03313-5
El Sayed M. Penetration of three endodontic sealers in simulated lateral canals during the lateral condensation technique: an in Vitro Study. Int J Dent. 2022;2022(1):2686247.
pubmed: 36440093
pmcid: 9683939
Shokouhinejad N, Nekoofar MH, Ashoftehyazdi K, Zahraee S, Khoshkhounejad M. Marginal adaptation of new bioceramic materials and mineral trioxide aggregate: a scanning electron microscopy study. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(2):144–8.
pubmed: 24688585
pmcid: 3961837
Zanza A, Reda R, Vannettelli E, Donfrancesco O, Relucenti M, Bhandi S, et al. The influence of thermomechanical compaction on the marginal adaptation of 4 different hydraulic sealers: a comparative ex vivo study. J Compos Sci. 2023;7(1):10.
doi: 10.3390/jcs7010010
Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.
pubmed: 27330520
pmcid: 4913118
doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Gelda AC, Saraf P, Agrawal M, Patil TN, Jadhav S, Kadtane SS. A comparative evaluation of sealing ability and marginal adaptation of four root-end filling materials using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope – an in vitro study. Dent J Adv Stud. 2021;12(5):213–7.
doi: 10.53064/jrad.2021.12.5.51
Ayatollahi F, Hazeri Baqdad Abad M, Razavi SH, Tabrizizadeh M, Ayatollahi R, Zarebidoki F. Evaluating the accuracy of two microleakage assessment methods for mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium-enriched mixture cement. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(4):497–501.
pubmed: 29225648
pmcid: 5722108
Dagna A, Mirando M, Beltrami R, Chiesa M, Poggio C, Colombo M. Gutta-percha solvents alternative to chloroform: an in vitro comparative evaluation. EC Dent Sci. 2017;15(2):51–6.
Lim M, Jung C, Shin DH, Cho YB, Song M. Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(3):e35.
pubmed: 32839716
pmcid: 7431927
doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35
Wang Y, Liu S, Dong Y. In vitro study of dentinal tubule penetration and filling quality of bioceramic sealer. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0192248.
pubmed: 29390037
pmcid: 5794174
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192248
Rekha R, Kavitha R, Venkitachalam R, Prabath SV, Deepthy S, Krishnan V. Comparison of the sealing ability of bioceramic sealer against epoxy resin based sealer: a systematic review & meta-analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023;13(1):28–35.
pubmed: 36345495
doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.10.006
Hamid EA. Comparative evaluation of push out bond strength of neosealer flo, totalfill BC and AH plus root canal sealers: an in vitro study. Egypt Dent J. 2023;69(4):3327–33.
doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.232253.2694
Shah A, Peacock R, Eliyas S. Pulp therapy and root canal treatment techniques in immature permanent teeth: an update. Br Dent J. 2022;232(8):524–30.
pubmed: 35459824
doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4139-4
Duruk G, Gundogdu Ozdal TP, Duman S. Accuracy of age estimation with Demirjian and Nolla methods in Eastern Turkish children aged 3–17 years old. Eur Oral Res. 2022;56(2):80–7.
pubmed: 36003846
pmcid: 9377772
Pelozo LL, Souza-Gabriel AE, Alves Dos Santos GN, Camargo RV, Lopes-Olhê FC, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Canal drying protocols to use with calcium silicate-based sealer: effect on bond strength and adhesive interface. J Endod. 2023;49(9):1154–60.
pubmed: 37516237
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.07.015
Adel M, Salmani Z, Youssefi N, Heidari B. Comparison of microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate apical plug applied by the manual technique and indirect use of ultrasonic with different powers. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021;22(4):290–5.
pubmed: 34904126
Patri G, Agrawal P, Anushree N, Arora S, Kunjappu JJ, Shamsuddin SV. A scanning electron microscope analysis of sealing potential and marginal adaptation of different root canal sealers to dentin: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020;21(1):73–7.
pubmed: 32381805
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2733
Hamdan R, Michetti J, Dionnet C, Diemer F, Georgelin-Gurgel M. In-vitro evaluation of apical microleakage of two obturation methods of immature permanent teeth: orthograde apical plug of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and root canal filling combining custom gutta-percha cone with Calcium Silicate-based sealer. G Ital Endod. 2017;31(2):89–95.
doi: 10.1016/j.gien.2017.09.001
Jafari F, Rahimi S, Shahi S, Jafari S. Endodontic microleakage studies: correlation among different methods, clinical relevance, and potential laboratory errors. Minerva Stomatol. 2017;66(4):169–77.
pubmed: 28650135
Abbas A, Kethineni B, Puppala R, Birapu UC, Raghavendra KJ, Reddy P. Efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as apical barriers in immature permanent teeth: a microbiological study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(6):656–62.
pubmed: 33976492
pmcid: 8060927
Refaei P, Jahromi MZ, Moughari AAK. Comparison of the microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and biodentine orthograde apical plug. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020;17(1):66–72.
pubmed: 32055296
doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.276238