Creation of an Emergency Care Capacity Assessment Tool for Facilities in Austere Environments.

Native American austere environment facility assessment health systems indigenous wilderness emergency medicine

Journal

Wilderness & environmental medicine
ISSN: 1545-1534
Titre abrégé: Wilderness Environ Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9505185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 12 9 2024
pubmed: 12 9 2024
entrez: 12 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Facilities in austere environments may consider emergency care beyond their scope. Often patients with high-acuity conditions have no other choice than to present to these facilities. The disconnect between the intent of health systems planners and the reality faced by providers manifests as facilities unable to manage such cases.The Indian Health Service, with a range of stakeholders, developed an emergency care delivery assessment tool for facilities in austere environments, designed to identify deficiencies in facility readiness for emergency care delivery across four areas: 1. Procedural2. Human resources3. Non-pharmacologic material resources4. Pharmacologic material resources. The tool's underlying architecture is a resource matrix similar to hospital-based tools, using the "Facility" component of the WHO Emergency Care Systems Framework as the Y-axis and undifferentiated presentations taught by the WHO basic emergency care course, advanced trauma life support, and advanced life support in obstetrics as the X-axis. The tool was piloted at a remote frontier clinic. We found 48 deficiencies: 7 procedural, 1 human resources, 31 non-pharmacologic materials, and 9 pharmacologic materials. We aggregated deficiencies by facility function to assess the capacity to perform each. We also aggregated deficiencies by clinical presentation to identify targets for educational interventions. We successfully created a novel emergency care capacity assessment tool for use in austere environments using materials with broad international consensus. The successful pilot found deficiencies across all 4 areas. This tool may be useful in many other remote domestic facilities and rural health posts in low- and middle-income countries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39262380
doi: 10.1177/10806032241278982
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10806032241278982

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Vijay Christopher Kannan (VC)

Office of Clinical Performance and Health Impact, Indian Health Service Headquarters, Rockville, MD, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Geoff Comp (G)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Stephanie Lareau (S)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.

Classifications MeSH