Impact of different energy sources on coagulation biomarkers and silent cerebral events in balloon-based ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation Catheter ablation Coagulation biomarker Cryoballoon ablation Laser balloon ablation Silent cerebral event

Journal

Heart rhythm O2
ISSN: 2666-5018
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm O2
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768511

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 12 9 2024
pubmed: 12 9 2024
entrez: 12 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Different energy sources of balloon-based ablation for pulmonary vein isolation cause different kinds of endothelial damage and coagulation responses associated with thromboembolic risk. The study sought to compare the impact of different balloon-based ablation, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA), on coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers and silent cerebral events (SCEs) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation using either CBA (n = 52) or LBA (n = 53) without radiofrequency touch-up ablation were eligible. Time course (day 0 [before ablation], day 1, day 2, and day 28) of myocardial enzymes and inflammatory and coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers was evaluated during the perioperative period. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 2 days after the procedure to evaluate SCEs. There was no difference in patient characteristics between CBA and LBA.CBA had greater myocardial injury (troponin I and creatine kinase-MB) and lower inflammatory reaction (white blood cell count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) than LBA. The coagulation biomarkers maximally increased by day 2 and then decreased in both groups. In day 28, the serum prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimer levels in LBA were significantly higher than the values in CBA. The fibrinolysis biomarker (plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex) did not increase after the procedure in either group. The incidence of SCEs was comparable between CBA and LBA (11% vs 15%; CBA and LBA had different effects on myocardial injury, inflammatory reaction, and coagulation activity but did not affect the incidence of thromboembolic events. LBA had significantly higher coagulation activity in day 28 and may require more careful postprocedural anticoagulation than CBA.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Different energy sources of balloon-based ablation for pulmonary vein isolation cause different kinds of endothelial damage and coagulation responses associated with thromboembolic risk.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
The study sought to compare the impact of different balloon-based ablation, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA), on coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers and silent cerebral events (SCEs) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation using either CBA (n = 52) or LBA (n = 53) without radiofrequency touch-up ablation were eligible. Time course (day 0 [before ablation], day 1, day 2, and day 28) of myocardial enzymes and inflammatory and coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers was evaluated during the perioperative period. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 2 days after the procedure to evaluate SCEs.
Results UNASSIGNED
There was no difference in patient characteristics between CBA and LBA.CBA had greater myocardial injury (troponin I and creatine kinase-MB) and lower inflammatory reaction (white blood cell count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) than LBA. The coagulation biomarkers maximally increased by day 2 and then decreased in both groups. In day 28, the serum prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimer levels in LBA were significantly higher than the values in CBA. The fibrinolysis biomarker (plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex) did not increase after the procedure in either group. The incidence of SCEs was comparable between CBA and LBA (11% vs 15%;
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
CBA and LBA had different effects on myocardial injury, inflammatory reaction, and coagulation activity but did not affect the incidence of thromboembolic events. LBA had significantly higher coagulation activity in day 28 and may require more careful postprocedural anticoagulation than CBA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39263611
doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.009
pii: S2666-5018(24)00188-0
pmc: PMC11385400
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

520-528

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Masayuki Koshikawa (M)

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Masahide Harada (M)

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Yoshihiro Nomura (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Asuka Nishimura (A)

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Yuji Motoike (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Eiichi Watanabe (E)

Department of Cardiology, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.

Yukio Ozaki (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University, Okazaki, Japan.

Hideo Izawa (H)

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Classifications MeSH