Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy/Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/SADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2023.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery SADI-S Single anastomosis duodenal-switch

Journal

Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 25 06 2024
accepted: 28 08 2024
revised: 28 06 2024
medline: 12 9 2024
pubmed: 12 9 2024
entrez: 12 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy/single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/SADS) has gained attention as an alternative to the traditional biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). In 2021, IFSO endorsed SADI-S/SADS as a safe and effective procedure, underscoring the necessity for long-term multidisciplinary care and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A task force was established to conduct a systematic review of current evidence on SADI-S/SADS to guide clinical practice. A systematic review was conducted across three databases, focusing on studies examining SADI-S/SADS and its outcomes. A total of 93 studies were analyzed. SADI-S/SADS demonstrated efficacy in weight loss and medium-to-long-term control of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), along with positive outcomes regarding hypertension and hyperlipidemia. However, its impact on other comorbidities remains inconclusive. Frequent nutritional deficiencies were identified, particularly in fat-soluble vitamins, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia. Despite significant efforts, high-quality evidence on SADI-S/SADS remains scarce, prompting IFSO to advocate for increased registry participation, publication of long-term studies, and more RCTs. Lifelong supplementation and monitoring for nutritional deficiencies are recommended. The current position statement will be reviewed in 2 years.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39264553
doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07490-0
pii: 10.1007/s11695-024-07490-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal–ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1614–8.
pubmed: 18040751 doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.
pubmed: 22963820 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.018
Lee WJ, Lee KT, Kasama K, et al. Laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal–jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG): short-term result and comparison with gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(1):109–13.
pubmed: 23990452 doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1067-z
Huang CK, Goel R, Tai CM, et al. Novel metabolic surgery for type II diabetes mellitus. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(6):481–5.
pubmed: 24300921 doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182950111
Karcz WK, Kuesters S, Marjanovic G, et al. Duodeno-enteral omega switches – more physiological techniques in metabolic surgery. Videosurgery Other Miniinvasive Tech. 2013;4:273–9.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2013.39647
Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2098–104.
pubmed: 26932811 doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2077-4
Kallies K, Rogers AM. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery updated statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(7):825–30.
pubmed: 32371036 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.020
Brown WA, de Leon Ballesteros GP, Ooi G, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement—Update 2020. Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):3–25.
pubmed: 33409979 doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05134-7
Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.
pubmed: 27914029 doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2471-y
Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(11):1686–90.
pubmed: 30220645 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.08.008
Dijkhorst PJ, Boerboom AB, Janssen IMC, et al. Failed sleeve gastrectomy: single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? A multicenter cohort study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3834–42.
pubmed: 30066245 pmcid: 6223754 doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3429-z
Moon RC, Alkhairi L, Wier AJ, et al. Conversions of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to duodenal switch (SADI-S and BPD-DS) for weight regain. Surg Endosc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07219-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07219-6 pubmed: 31637605 pmcid: 6766418
Moon RC, Fuentes AS, Teixeira AF, et al. Conversions after sleeve gastrectomy for weight regain: to single and double anastomosis duodenal switch and gastric bypass at a single institution. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):48–53.
pubmed: 30251089 doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3514-3
Osorio J, Lazzara C, Admella V, et al. Revisional laparoscopic SADI-S vs. duodenal switch following failed primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center comparison of 101 consecutive cases. Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3667–74.
pubmed: 33982240 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05469-9
Admella V, Osorio J, Sorribas M, et al. Direct and two-step single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S): Unicentric comparative analysis of 232 cases. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 2021;99(7):514–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.017
Liagre A, Martini F, Anduze Y, et al. Efficacy and drawbacks of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass after sleeve gastrectomy in a tertiary referral bariatric center. Obes Surg. 2021;31(6):2691–700.
pubmed: 33834374 pmcid: 8113294 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05323-y
de la Cruz M, Büsing M, Dukovska R, et al. Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(8):1060–6.
pubmed: 32473786 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.014
Dijkhorst PJ, Al Nawas M, Heusschen L, et al. Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed sleeve gastrectomy: medium-term outcomes. Obes Surg. 2021;31(11):4708–16.
pubmed: 34398380 pmcid: 8490218 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05609-1
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2015;11(5):1092–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024 pubmed: 26048517
Ser KH, Lee WJ, Chen JC, et al. Laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG): surgical risk and long-term results. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2019;15(2):236–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.11.020 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.11.020 pubmed: 30665851
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez N, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a revisional or second-step operation after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2020;16(10):1491–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.022 pubmed: 32665113
Surve A, Cottam D, Medlin W, et al. Long-term outcomes of primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(11):1638–46.
pubmed: 32843266 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.07.019
Surve A, Cottam D, Belnap L, et al. Long-term (> 6 years) outcomes of duodenal switch (DS) versus single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): a matched cohort study. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2021;31(12):5117–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05709-y .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05709-y pubmed: 34523085
Surve A, Cottam D, Richards C, et al. A matched cohort comparison of long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1438–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05131-w .
Yashkov Y, Bordan N, Torres A, et al. SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y duodenal switch (RY-DS): results of 5-year observational study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(2):570–9.
pubmed: 33047290 doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05031-z
Pujol-Gebellí J, Lazzara C, de Gordejuela AGR, et al. Duodenal switch vs. single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) for the treatment of grade IV obesity: 5-year outcomes of a multicenter prospective cohort comparative study. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2022;32(12):3839–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06317-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06317-0
Ortiz-Zuñiga AM, Costa Forner P, Cirera De Tudela A, et al. The impact of the length of the common intestinal loop on metabolic and nutritional outcomes of patients with severe obesity who undergo of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year follow-up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2022;32(9):955–61.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0863
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MÁR, Ferré NP, et al. Long-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg [Internet]. 2022;32(3):682–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05879-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05879-9 pubmed: 35032311 pmcid: 8760573
Lin S, Li C, Shen JJ, et al. Loop versus Roux-en-Y duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes: short-term outcomes of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(11):1277–85.
pubmed: 35985975 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.07.003
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Conde M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2015;11(2):351–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.06.016 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.06.016 pubmed: 25543309
Admella V, Osorio J, Sorribas M, et al. Direct and two-step single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S): Unicentric comparative analysis of 232 cases. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 2021;99(7):514–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.017
Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.
pubmed: 27914029 doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2471-y
Huang CK, Tai CM, Chang PC, et al. Loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: comparative study with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in type 2 diabetic patients with a BMI <35 kg/m2, first year results. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2291–301.
pubmed: 26935711 doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2118-z
Nor Hanipah Z, Hsin MC, Liu CC, et al. Laparoscopic loop duodenaljejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in type 2 diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(5):696–702.
pubmed: 30935839 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.016
Shen SC, Lee WJ, Kasama K, et al. Efficacy of different procedures of metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes in Asia: a multinational and multicenter exploratory study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):2153–60.
pubmed: 33523416 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05239-7
Ruan X, Zhang W, Cai H, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal end-to-side anastomosis in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: the initial experiences in a Chinese population with a more than 4-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1683–91.
pubmed: 28780045 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.07.009
Lin S, Yang N, Guan W, et al. Can Chinese T2D patients with BMI 20–32.5 kg/m2 benefit from loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(9):1513–9.
pubmed: 31548005 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.027
Ceha CMM, van Wezenbeek MR, Versteegden DPA, et al. Matched short-term results of SADI versus GBP after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3809–14.
pubmed: 30039236 doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3415-5
Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, et al. A multi-institutional study on the mid-term outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass as a surgical revision option after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3165–73.
pubmed: 31388962 doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03917-1
Vennapusa A, Panchangam RB, Kesara C, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenal switch surgery for obesity in Indian patients. World J Laparosc Surg. 2020;13(3):117–24.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1423
Lee WJ, Almulaifi AM, Tsou JJ, et al. Duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy versus the sleeve gastrectomy procedure alone: the role of duodenal exclusion. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):765–70.
pubmed: 25813754 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.12.017
Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, et al. Mid-term 4-year outcomes with single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy surgery at a single US center. Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3062–72.
pubmed: 29909514 doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3358-x
Spinos D, Skarentzos K, Esagian SM, et al. The effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS): an updated systematic review. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1790–800.
pubmed: 33452998 doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05188-7
Chen G, Zhang G-X, Peng B-Q, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy plus procedures for treatment of morbid obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3303–11.
pubmed: 33956302 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05456-0
Balamurugan G, Leo SJ, Sivagnanam ST, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) vs single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): a systematic review of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(7):2194–209.
pubmed: 37140720 doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06602-6
Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Zalasky A, et al. Evaluation of metabolic outcomes following SADI-S: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2022;32(4):1049–63.
pubmed: 35001254 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05824-w
Nakanishi H, Matar RH, Vahibe A, et al. Single versus double anastomosis duodenal switch in the management of obesity: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022;32(5):595–605.
pubmed: 36130714
Portela R, Marrerro K, Vahibe A, et al. Bile reflux after single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S): a meta-analysis of 2,029 patients. Obes Surg. 2022;32(5):1516–22.
pubmed: 35137290 doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05943-y
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MAR, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.
pubmed: 20798995 doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0247-3
Ramos-Leví AM, Sánchez-Pernaute A, Marcuello C, et al. Glucose variability after bariatric surgery: is prediction of diabetes remission possible? Obes Surg. 2017;27(12):3341–3.
pubmed: 29034446 doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2960-7
Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2016;26(10):2363–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2133-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2133-0 pubmed: 26992894
Cottam A, Cottam D, Medlin W, et al. A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3958–64.
pubmed: 26694182 doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4707-7
Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D, et al. A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2017;13(3):415–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.020 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.020 pubmed: 28089438
Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two-year follow-up. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2017;27(2):454–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2341-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2341-7 pubmed: 27568033
Cottam A, Cottam D, Zaveri H, et al. An analysis of mid-term complications, weight loss, and type 2 diabetes resolution of stomach intestinal pylorus-sparing surgery (SIPS) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2894–902.
pubmed: 29790130 doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3309-6
Surve A, Cottam D, Sanchez-Pernaute A, et al. The incidence of complications associated with loop duodeno-ileostomy after single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedures among 1328 patients: a multicenter experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(5):594–601.
pubmed: 29530597 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.020
Neichoy BT, Schniederjan B, Cottam DR, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus-sparing surgery for morbid obesity. JSLS. 2018;22(1):e2017.00063.
pubmed: 29398898 pmcid: 5779797 doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00063
Enochs P, Bull J, Surve A, et al. Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single US center. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2020;16(1):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008 pubmed: 31753795
Cottam D, Roslin M, Enochs P, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal switch: 1-year outcomes. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1506–14.
pubmed: 32043255 doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04352-y
Summerhays C, Cottam D, Cottam A. Internal hernia after revisional laparoscopic loop duodenal switch surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):e13–5.
pubmed: 26433641 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.08.510
Surve A, Cottam D, Horsley B. Internal hernia following primary laparoscopic SADI-S: the first reported case. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):2066–8.
pubmed: 32124214 doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04444-0
Pereira SS, Guimarães M, Almeida R, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) result in distinct post-prandial hormone profiles. Int J Obes. 2019;43(12):2518–27.
doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0282-z
Pereira AM, Guimarães M, Pereira SS. Single and dual anastomosis duodenal switch for obesity treatment: a single-center experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17(1):12–9.
pubmed: 33127321 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.029
Vennapusa A, Panchangam RB, Kesara C, Madivada MS. Metabolic efficacy and diabetes remission predictors following ‘sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenojejunal bypass’ surgery. J Metab Bariatr Surg. 2020;9(2):33–41. https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2020.9.2.33 .
Vennapusa A, Panchangam RB, Kesara C, et al. Factors predicting weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenojejunal bypass surgery for obesity. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021;29(4):327–9.
doi: 10.7570/jomes20132
Vennapusa A, Bhargav Panchangam R, Kesara C, et al. Metabolic efficacy following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenal switch surgery for type 2 diabetes in Indian patients with severe obesity. Diabetes Metab Syndr: Clin Res Rev [Internet]. 2021;15(2):581–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.02.036 .
doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.02.036
Grueneberger JM, Karcz-Socha I, Marjanovic G, et al. Pylorus preserving loop duodeno-enterostomy with sleeve gastrectomy - Preliminary results. BMC Surg. 2014;14(1):1–8.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-20
Huang CK, Wang MY, Das SS, et al. Laparoscopic conversion to loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for intractable dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass—two case reports. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):947.
pubmed: 25708238 doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1608-8
Nelson L, Moon RC, Teixeira AF, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: preliminary result from a single institution. ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo). 2016;29(suppl 1):80–4.
pmcid: 5064271 doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201600s10020
Vilallonga R, Balibrea JM, Curell A, et al. Technical options for malabsorption issues after single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(12):3344–8.
pubmed: 28952026 doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2931-z
Kirkpatrick V, Moon RC, Teixeira AF, et al. Cirrhosis following single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;45:130–2.
pubmed: 29605778 pmcid: 6000903 doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.03.021
Li YX, Fang DH, Liu TX. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus of patients with body mass index higher than 27.5 kg/m2 but lower than 32.5 kg/m2. Medicine. 2018;97(31):e11537.
pubmed: 30075520 pmcid: 6081088 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011537
Moon RC, Gaskins L, Teixeira AF, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: 2-year result from a single US institution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(6):1571–7.
pubmed: 29273925 doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3066-y
Moon RC, Kirkpatrick V, Gaskins L, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single- versus double-anastomosis duodenal switch at a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(2):245–52.
pubmed: 30606470 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.11.004
Pearlstein S, Sabrudin SA, Shayesteh A, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic conversion of failed adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS). Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1726–33.
pubmed: 30767186 doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03729-3
Sessa L, Guidone C, Gallucci P, et al. Effect of single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy on glucose tolerance test: comparison with other bariatric procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(7):1091–7.
pubmed: 31130403 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.04.013
Andalib A, Bouchard P, Alamri H, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): short-term outcomes from a prospective cohort study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17(2):414–24.
pubmed: 33158766 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.015
Bashah M, Aleter A, Baazaoui J, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) versus one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional procedures for patients with weight recidivism after sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative analysis of efficacy and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2020;30(12):4715–23.
pubmed: 32845477 pmcid: 7719107 doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04933-2
Finno P, Osorio J, García-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela A, et al. Single versus double-anastomosis duodenal switch: single-site comparative cohort study in 440 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04566-5
Surve A, Rao R, Cottam D, et al. Early outcomes of primary SADI-S: an Australian experience. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1429–36.
pubmed: 31925728 doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04312-6
Sang Q, Wang L, Wuyun Q, et al. Retrospective comparison of SADI-S versus RYGB in Chinese with diabetes and BMI< 35kg/m2: a propensity score adjustment analysis. Obes Surg. 2021;31(12):5166–75.
pubmed: 34591261 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05708-z
Wang L, Wuyun Q, Du D, et al. Primary SADI-S in Chinese with diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m2: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3116–22.
pubmed: 33791928 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05371-4
Ruano-Campos A, Cruz-Utrilla A, López-Antoñanzas L, et al. Evaluation of myocardial function following SADI-S. Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3109–15.
pubmed: 33755898 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05349-2
Balint IB, Csaszar F, Orban L, et al. A safety study of laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with gastric plication (SADI-GP) in the management of morbid obesity. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407(2):845–60.
pubmed: 34402959 doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02276-9
Lind RP, Ghanem M, Teixeira AF, et al. Single- versus double-anastomosis duodenal switch: outcomes stratified by preoperative BMI. Obes Surg. 2022;32(12):3869–78.
pubmed: 36279044 doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06315-2
Pennestrì F, Sessa L, Prioli F, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): experience from a high-bariatric volume center. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407(5):1851–62.
pubmed: 35352174 pmcid: 9399205 doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02501-z
Qudah Y, Alhareb A, Barajas-Gamboa JS, et al. Robotic revisional single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass after sleeve gastrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2022;32(10):1027–31.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0470
Admella V, Lazzara C, Sobrino L, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life after single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): a cross-sectional study with 283 patients from a single institution. Obes Surg. 2023;33(6):1754–63.
pubmed: 36920683 pmcid: 10016163 doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06554-x
Wang L, Wang Z, Jiang T. Outcomes of totally robotic single-anastomosis duodenal–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a large single-centre series. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(1):501–7.
pubmed: 35718613 doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.009
Wang Z, Wang L, Jiang T, et al. Efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of Chinese T2D patients with obesity. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(2):756–60.
pubmed: 35817706 doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.152
Marincola G, Velluti V, Voloudakis N, et al. Medium-term nutritional and metabolic outcome of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Nutrients. 2023;15(3):1–11.
doi: 10.3390/nu15030742
Pennestrì F, Sessa L, Prioli F, et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic approach for single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Updates Surg. 2023;75(1):175–87.
pubmed: 36161395 doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01381-8
Rao R, Mehta M, Sheth DR, et al. Four-year nutritional outcomes in single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy patients: an Australian experience. Obes Surg. 2023;33(3):750–60.
pubmed: 36698049 pmcid: 9877492 doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06461-1
Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O, et al. The first case report of failed single-anastomosis-duodeno-ileal bypass converted to One anastomosis gastric bypass/Mini-gastric bypass. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;35:68–72.
pubmed: 28448862 pmcid: 5406540 doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.04.020
Tsai YN, Wang HP, Huang CK, et al. Endoluminal stenting for the management of leak following sleeve gastrectomy and loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(1):43–8.
pubmed: 29310815 doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.004
Abusabeib A, El Ansari W, Elhag W. First case report of acquired copper deficiency following revisional single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) leading to severe pancytopenia with refractory anemia. Obes Surg. 2020;30(12):5131–4.
pubmed: 32860129 pmcid: 7455096 doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04916-3
Lazzara C, Osorio J, Valcarcel J, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding after laparoscopic duodenal switch and SADI-s caused by pseudoaneurysm of gastroduodenal artery: first reported cases. Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3330–2.
pubmed: 33754276 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05358-1
Mercado M, Cheng Q, Liu D, et al. Gastric ischaemia after SADI with right gastric artery ligation. Obes Surg. 2022;32(4):1366–9.
pubmed: 34989974 doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05863-3
Vanetta C, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, et al. Bariatric surgery conversions in MBSAQIP centers: current indications and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2022;32(10):3248–56.
pubmed: 35918597 doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06229-z
Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Jogiat U, et al. Patient selection and 30-day outcomes of SADI-S compared to RYGB: a retrospective cohort study of 47,375 patients. Obes Surg. 2022;32(7):1–8.
pubmed: 35445967 pmcid: 9022408 doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06068-y
Wang L, Yu Y, Wang J, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve for robotic single-anastomosis duodenal–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Front Surg. 2022;9(July):1–7.
Barajas-Gamboa JS, Moon S, Romero-Velez G, et al. Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(11):8682–9.
pubmed: 37500921 doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10305-5
Clapp B, Mosleh KA, Corbett J, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus single anastomosis duodenoileostomy with sleeve: comparative analysis of 30-day outcomes using the MBSAQIP. Obes Surg. 2023;33(3):720–4.
pubmed: 36652188 doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06452-2
Clapp B, Corbett J, Jordan M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve in the United States: a first comparative safety analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023;19(1):11–7.
pubmed: 36198497 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.016

Auteurs

Guillermo Ponce de Leon-Ballesteros (G)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy.

Gustavo Romero-Velez (G)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy.

Kelvin Higa (K)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy.

Jacques Himpens (J)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy.

Mary O' Kane (M)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy.

Antonio Torres (A)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy.

Gerhard Prager (G)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy.

Miguel F Herrera (MF)

International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Naples, Italy. miguelfherrera@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH