Early-stage implementation of peer-led interventions for emergency department patients with substance use disorder: Findings from a formative qualitative evaluation.

Emergency departments Peer recovery coach Program implementation Substance use disorder

Journal

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
ISSN: 2949-8759
Titre abrégé: J Subst Use Addict Treat
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918541186406676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 23 04 2024
revised: 20 08 2024
accepted: 08 09 2024
medline: 13 9 2024
pubmed: 13 9 2024
entrez: 12 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Emergency department (ED)-based peer recovery coach (PRC) programs can improve access to substance use disorder treatment (SUD) for ED patients. As literature on early stages of PRC implementation is limited, we conducted a qualitative assessment of ED PRC program implementation from several US-based PRC programs focusing on barriers and facilitators for implementation and providing recommendations based on the findings. We collected qualitative data from 39 key informants (peer recovery coaches, PRC program managers, ED physicians and staff, representatives of community-based organizations) via 6 focus groups and 21 interviews in February-December 2023. We transcribed audio-recordings and analyzed data using codebook thematic analysis. We identified the following major themes related to specific barriers and recommendations to address them. To facilitate timely linkage to PRCs, programs would regularly inform ED staff about the program and its linkage procedures, establish trust between PRC and ED staff, streamline the linkage procedures, and choose an "opt-out" linkage approach. To address barriers related to external referrals, programs use "warm handoff" and "warm line" strategies, maintain and update a comprehensive catalog of resources, and familiarize peer coaches with local service providers. Telehealth services implementation requires addressing logistical barriers, ensuring patients' privacy, and training peer coaches on building trust and rapport online. Peer coaches' wellness and quality of services can be improved by limiting PRC's workload, prioritizing quality over quantity, facilitating self-, peer- and professional care to mitigate stress and burnout; and, importantly, by providing supportive supervision and training to peer coaches and advocating for PRC team as an equal partner in the ED settings. To facilitate PRC program adoption and sustainment program managers engage local communities and program champions, seek diverse sources of funding, and advocate for structural changes to accommodate recruitment and retention of peer recovery coaches. We compiled a wealth of best practices used by PRC programs to address numerous implementation barriers and challenges. These recommendations are intended for PRC program planners, managers and champions, hospital leadership, and state and local public health agencies leading SUD epidemic response.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39265917
pii: S2949-8759(24)00230-3
doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209518
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

209518

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest All authors report no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Umedjon Ibragimov (U)

Center for Population Sciences and Health Equity, College of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America. Electronic address: ui23a@fsu.edu.

Nicholas A Giordano (NA)

Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Sneha Amaresh (S)

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Tatiana Getz (T)

Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Tatiana Matuszewski (T)

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Alaina R Steck (AR)

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

MaryJo Schmidt (M)

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Jose Iglesias (J)

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Yan Li (Y)

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Eliot H Blum (EH)

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

D Ann Glasheen (DA)

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Jessica Tuttle (J)

Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Hardik Pipalia (H)

Aniz, Inc. Holistic Harm Reduction Integrated Care Clinic, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Hannah L F Cooper (HLF)

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Joseph E Carpenter (JE)

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America; Georgia Poison Center, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Classifications MeSH