Patient comfort with sexual orientation and gender identity questions in adult congenital cardiology clinics.

Adult congenital heart disease LGBTQ+ SOGI electronic medical records patient-centred care sexual orientation

Journal

Cardiology in the young
ISSN: 1467-1107
Titre abrégé: Cardiol Young
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9200019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 15 9 2024
pubmed: 15 9 2024
entrez: 13 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Lack of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data creates barriers for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) people in health care. Barriers to SOGI data collection include physician misperception that patients do not want to answer these questions and discomfort asking SOGI questions. This study aimed to assess patient comfort towards SOGI questions across five quaternary care adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) centres. A survey administered to ACHD patients (≥18 years) asked (1) two-step gender identity and birth sex, (2) acceptance of SOGI data, and (3) the importance for ACHD physicians to know SOGI data. Chi-square tests were used to analyse differences among demographic groups and logistic regression modelled agreement with statement of patient disclosure of SOGI improving patient-physician communication. Among 322 ACHD patients, 82% identified as heterosexual and 16% identified as LGBTQ+, across the age ranges 18-29 years (39.4%), 30-49 years (47.8%), 50-64 years (8.7%), and > 65 years (4.0%). Respondents (90.4%) felt comfortable answering SOGI questions. Respondents with bachelor's/higher education were more likely to "agree" that disclosure of SOGI improves patient-physician communication compared to those with less than bachelor's education (OR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.41, 4.25; p = .0015). These findings suggest that in this largely heterosexual population, SOGI data collection is unlikely to cause patient discomfort. Respondents with higher education were twice as likely to agree that SOGI disclosure improves patient-physician communication. The inclusion of SOGI data in future studies will provide larger samples of underrepresented minorities (e.g. LGBTQ+ population), thereby reducing healthcare disparities within the field of cardiovascular research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lack of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data creates barriers for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) people in health care. Barriers to SOGI data collection include physician misperception that patients do not want to answer these questions and discomfort asking SOGI questions. This study aimed to assess patient comfort towards SOGI questions across five quaternary care adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) centres.
METHODS METHODS
A survey administered to ACHD patients (≥18 years) asked (1) two-step gender identity and birth sex, (2) acceptance of SOGI data, and (3) the importance for ACHD physicians to know SOGI data. Chi-square tests were used to analyse differences among demographic groups and logistic regression modelled agreement with statement of patient disclosure of SOGI improving patient-physician communication.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 322 ACHD patients, 82% identified as heterosexual and 16% identified as LGBTQ+, across the age ranges 18-29 years (39.4%), 30-49 years (47.8%), 50-64 years (8.7%), and > 65 years (4.0%). Respondents (90.4%) felt comfortable answering SOGI questions. Respondents with bachelor's/higher education were more likely to "agree" that disclosure of SOGI improves patient-physician communication compared to those with less than bachelor's education (OR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.41, 4.25; p = .0015).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that in this largely heterosexual population, SOGI data collection is unlikely to cause patient discomfort. Respondents with higher education were twice as likely to agree that SOGI disclosure improves patient-physician communication. The inclusion of SOGI data in future studies will provide larger samples of underrepresented minorities (e.g. LGBTQ+ population), thereby reducing healthcare disparities within the field of cardiovascular research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39267597
pii: S1047951124025344
doi: 10.1017/S1047951124025344
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Stephen C Cook (SC)

Indiana University Adult Congenital Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Brototo Deb (B)

Medstar Georgetown University - Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Tony Pastor (T)

Yale Adult Congenital Heart Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Clare Hobson (C)

Boston Adult Congenital Heart Program, Boston, MA, USA.

Kaitlyn Walsh (K)

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Susan Ofner (S)

Indiana University Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Katherine Salciccioli (K)

Adult Congenital Heart Program at Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Vincent Gonzalez (V)

Adult Congenital Heart Program at Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Leigh C Reardon (LC)

Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Matthew Carazo (M)

Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH