Closing the value-based circle in shared decision-making: a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process through patient reported outcome and experience measures.
PREMs
PROMS
digital patient decision aid
patient-reported outcomes
shared decision-making
value-based healthcare
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
20
06
2024
accepted:
15
08
2024
medline:
13
9
2024
pubmed:
13
9
2024
entrez:
13
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The spreading adoption of value-based models of healthcare delivery has incentivized the use of patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in clinical practice, with the potential to enrich the decision-making process with patient-reported data. This perspective article explores PROs and the shared decision-making (SDM) process as components of value-based healthcare. We describe the potential of PROMs and PREMs within the decision-making process and present a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process using aggregated data from a healthcare system PROMs and PREMs program, including early results from implementation in hospital network in Madrid, Spain. The proposed digital framework incorporates aggregated data from a hospital network PROMs and PREMs program as part of a digital patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with lymphoma. After the first hematologist appointment, participating patients access the PDA to review relevant information about clinical and patient-reported outcomes for each of the possible options, assign a personal order of priority to different outcomes, and then select their preferred course of action. Patients' answers are automatically uploaded to the EHR and discussed with hematologists at the next appointment. After beginning treatment, patients are invited to participate in the network PROMs program; participants' PROMs data are fed back into the PDA, thus "closing the circle" between the decision-making process and patient-reported data collection.During the first 14 months after launching the decision aid in October 2022, of 25 patients diagnosed with follicular lymphoma at the four participating hospitals, 13 patients decided to participate. No significant differences in age or sex were observed between groups. Average SDM Q-9 score for patients filling in the questionnaire ( Various obstacles toward widespread implementation of SDM exist such as time constraints, lack of motivation, and resistance to change. Support and active engagement from policy makers and healthcare managers is key to overcome hurdles for capturing patient-reported data and carrying out shared decision-making at healthcare system level. Early results of a digital framework for PRO-enriched SDM seem to be beneficial to the decision-making process.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The spreading adoption of value-based models of healthcare delivery has incentivized the use of patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in clinical practice, with the potential to enrich the decision-making process with patient-reported data.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This perspective article explores PROs and the shared decision-making (SDM) process as components of value-based healthcare. We describe the potential of PROMs and PREMs within the decision-making process and present a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process using aggregated data from a healthcare system PROMs and PREMs program, including early results from implementation in hospital network in Madrid, Spain.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The proposed digital framework incorporates aggregated data from a hospital network PROMs and PREMs program as part of a digital patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with lymphoma. After the first hematologist appointment, participating patients access the PDA to review relevant information about clinical and patient-reported outcomes for each of the possible options, assign a personal order of priority to different outcomes, and then select their preferred course of action. Patients' answers are automatically uploaded to the EHR and discussed with hematologists at the next appointment. After beginning treatment, patients are invited to participate in the network PROMs program; participants' PROMs data are fed back into the PDA, thus "closing the circle" between the decision-making process and patient-reported data collection.During the first 14 months after launching the decision aid in October 2022, of 25 patients diagnosed with follicular lymphoma at the four participating hospitals, 13 patients decided to participate. No significant differences in age or sex were observed between groups. Average SDM Q-9 score for patients filling in the questionnaire (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Various obstacles toward widespread implementation of SDM exist such as time constraints, lack of motivation, and resistance to change. Support and active engagement from policy makers and healthcare managers is key to overcome hurdles for capturing patient-reported data and carrying out shared decision-making at healthcare system level. Early results of a digital framework for PRO-enriched SDM seem to be beneficial to the decision-making process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39267640
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452440
pmc: PMC11390557
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1452440Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 del Olmo Rodríguez, Martos Martinez, Pascual Martínez, Miranda Castillo, Short Apellaniz, Pfang, Baca-García and Córdoba Mascuñano.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Pediatr. 2020 Jul 28;8:364
pubmed: 32850521
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 08;9:863040
pubmed: 35463777
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):133-140
pubmed: 31098886
Am J Med. 2011 Jun;124(6):549-56
pubmed: 21605732
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 01;135(3):225-231
pubmed: 28125754
Health Policy. 2021 Sep;125(9):1247-1255
pubmed: 34311981
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 20;37(12):984-991
pubmed: 30811293
Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1575-84
pubmed: 25867256
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Dec;58(6):1048-1055.e2
pubmed: 31472276
JMIR Perioper Med. 2020 Apr 3;3(1):e15588
pubmed: 33393920
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Jun;68(2):186-195
pubmed: 32815314
JAMA. 2019 Jul 2;322(1):25-26
pubmed: 31002337
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 May-Jun;38(3):272-292
pubmed: 31833452
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:125-135
pubmed: 28433671
Blood. 2006 Jan 1;107(1):265-76
pubmed: 16150940
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):276-84
pubmed: 23381520
Oncologist. 2023 Feb 8;28(2):105-115
pubmed: 36342114
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):500
pubmed: 38641809
Patient. 2023 May;16(3):255-264
pubmed: 36790557
Digit Health. 2022 Jan 28;8:20552076221074485
pubmed: 35111333
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3669-76
pubmed: 27260018
Hematol Oncol. 2015 Jun;33(2):85-98
pubmed: 24811073
BMJ. 2012 Jan 27;344:e256
pubmed: 22286508
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):504-6
pubmed: 26863351
Health Expect. 2000 Sep;3(3):182-191
pubmed: 11281928
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e110229
pubmed: 25333349
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2331301
pubmed: 37656459
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):524-540
pubmed: 31840346
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):3563-3569
pubmed: 33159220
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):736-40
pubmed: 14512487
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Sep;29(9):5253-5261
pubmed: 33655412
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2:2116-54
pubmed: 26573890
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Nov 12;66(6):443-459
pubmed: 27618563
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Dec 12;5(1):83
pubmed: 31831752
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):319-27
pubmed: 16872793
Ann Oncol. 2022 Sep;33(9):878-892
pubmed: 35462007
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):7
pubmed: 34991580
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 May;35(5):331-338
pubmed: 36918330
BMJ. 2011 Mar 22;342:d1745
pubmed: 21427038
BMJ. 2010 Oct 14;341:c5146
pubmed: 20947577
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Jun 1;29(3):413-418
pubmed: 30544169