Long-gap esophageal atresia: is native esophagus preservation always possible?
anastomotic stricture
esophageal atresia
esophageal repair
esophageal replacement
esophageal salvage
gastroesophageal reflux
long gap esophageal atresia
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
17
06
2024
accepted:
12
08
2024
medline:
13
9
2024
pubmed:
13
9
2024
entrez:
13
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital defect that causes esophageal discontinuity, often with an associated tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF) in 70%-90% of cases. When the distance between esophageal ends precludes primary anastomosis, it results in long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), complicating the surgical management. This study retrospectively reviewed LGEA cases from the past decade, treated with the goal of preserving the native esophagus, comparing surgical techniques and outcomes with current literature. The data of patients treated for LGEA between 2013 and 2024 were collected from medical charts, focusing on patients treated with the preservation of their native esophagus. Ten patients were enrolled for this study. All of them had a gap between the esophageal ends equal to or greater than three vertebral bodies. Four patients (40%) underwent a delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) procedure, while the remaining six (60%) underwent a traction staged repair. All patients were treated with open surgery. The follow-up period extended from 3 months to 10 years. Preserving the native esophagus in patients with LGEA is a challenging but feasible goal, with delayed primary anastomosis and traction techniques playing key roles. We advocate for the preservation of the native esophagus as the preferred approach for ensuring a high quality of life for patients, as it helps to avoid severe long-term complications associated with esophageal substitution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39268363
doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1450378
pmc: PMC11390569
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1450378Informations de copyright
© 2024 Treccarichi, Di Benedetto, Loria and Scuderi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Apr;50(4):535-9
pubmed: 25840058
J Surg Res. 2020 Jul;251:47-52
pubmed: 32113037
Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Aug;23(8):767-71
pubmed: 17579871
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Apr;54(4):675-687
pubmed: 30853248
Pediatr Med Chir. 2019 Dec 19;41(2):
pubmed: 32323518
Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 May;33(5):527-550
pubmed: 28062891
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Feb;86(2):83-90
pubmed: 24761413
European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2024 Feb 02;12(1):e33-e37
pubmed: 38312432
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):329-342
pubmed: 38455743
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct;27(5):443-448
pubmed: 28061521
Front Pediatr. 2023 Nov 22;11:1300802
pubmed: 38078333
Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Apr;44(4):467-75
pubmed: 24366604
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Aug;30(4):326-336
pubmed: 31266084
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007 May 11;2:24
pubmed: 17498283
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2016 Jul-Sep;21(3):98-105
pubmed: 27365900