Determinants of Successful Implementation of Assistive Technologies for Dementia: Exploratory Survey.


Journal

JMIR aging
ISSN: 2561-7605
Titre abrégé: JMIR Aging
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101740387

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 13 10 2023
revised: 16 05 2024
accepted: 19 06 2024
medline: 13 9 2024
pubmed: 13 9 2024
entrez: 13 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite positive results for the use of assistive technologies (ATs) in dementia, the uptake of ATs lags behind. It is considered important to assess determinants of successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs. We explored factors that influence the implementation of ATs for community-dwelling people with dementia, with the aim to better understand potentially effective implementation strategies. A cross-sectional survey for researchers was developed and disseminated, exploring factors that influence either successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs for dementia. The survey consisted of closed and open questions. The response rate was 10% (21/206); the 21 respondents who completed the survey were from 8 countries. Determinants of implementation were described for 21 ATs, of which 12 were successfully and 9 were unsuccessfully implemented. Various types of ATs were included, such as online platforms, sensors, or physical aids. The main determinants of implementation success were related to the AT itself, contextual factors, research activities, and implementation strategies. There was a lack of research data on some ethical issues and cost-effectiveness. This study provided insight into some main barriers to and facilitators of implementation of ATs in dementia related to the AT itself, context, research-related activities, and applied implementation strategies. Lessons were formulated for various stakeholders to improve the implementation effectiveness of ATs in dementia.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Despite positive results for the use of assistive technologies (ATs) in dementia, the uptake of ATs lags behind. It is considered important to assess determinants of successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs.
Objective UNASSIGNED
We explored factors that influence the implementation of ATs for community-dwelling people with dementia, with the aim to better understand potentially effective implementation strategies.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A cross-sectional survey for researchers was developed and disseminated, exploring factors that influence either successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs for dementia. The survey consisted of closed and open questions.
Results UNASSIGNED
The response rate was 10% (21/206); the 21 respondents who completed the survey were from 8 countries. Determinants of implementation were described for 21 ATs, of which 12 were successfully and 9 were unsuccessfully implemented. Various types of ATs were included, such as online platforms, sensors, or physical aids. The main determinants of implementation success were related to the AT itself, contextual factors, research activities, and implementation strategies. There was a lack of research data on some ethical issues and cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
This study provided insight into some main barriers to and facilitators of implementation of ATs in dementia related to the AT itself, context, research-related activities, and applied implementation strategies. Lessons were formulated for various stakeholders to improve the implementation effectiveness of ATs in dementia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39269371
pii: v7i1e53640
doi: 10.2196/53640
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e53640

Informations de copyright

© Henriëtte Geralde Van der Roest, Hannah Liane Christie, Manuel Angel Franco-Martin, Rose-Marie Dröes, Marjolein Elizabeth de Vugt, Franka Meiland. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org).

Auteurs

Henriëtte Geralde Van der Roest (HG)

Department on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, Netherlands.

Hannah Liane Christie (HL)

Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Manuel Angel Franco-Martin (MA)

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Salamanca University, Zamora, Spain.

Rose-Marie Dröes (RM)

Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam location), Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Marjolein Elizabeth de Vugt (ME)

Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Franka Meiland (F)

Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam location), Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH